Re: digital camera recomendations

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 03:30:41PM -0800, Mike McClain wrote: > I'm in the market for an inexpensive digital camera. I want to thank everyone for their input. After looking at the stats of each camera suggested and comparing them side by side at http://www.dpreview.com/ I settled on the Canon A59

Re: digital camera recomendations

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:34:16AM -0800, Mike McClain wrote: > AA batteries are cheap, readily available and I can get NiCad and NiMH. > Custom rechargable battery packs are like printer ink cartridges. They report being empty when there is still a week or two of use left? -- Chris. == I c

Re: digital camera recomendations

> AA batteries are cheap, readily available and I can get NiCad and NiMH. > Custom rechargable battery packs are like printer ink cartridges. I agree to some extent. But AA batteries do not come on Li-ion versions, and there's a good reason why all cameras (and laptop) batteries use Li-ion: it h

Re: digital camera recomendations

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:14:55 -0500, mitch wrote: > > I work at a nationwide chain of Camera/Imaging stores. > > AA batteries are used in Nikon, Canon and Fuji's and Panasonic. Best to > go with rechargeable batteries. Also some Pentax cameras - you just have to check, if specific camera uses

Re: digital camera recomendations

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:02:10PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote: > On 2009-02-19T16:05:55, Richard Lyons wrote: > > The rechargeeables, both NiCad and NiMH, are a good idea in principle, but > > lose charge when not in use and become ineffective surprisingly quickly in > > my experience. > > Try the lo

Re: digital camera recomendations

On Thursday 19 February 2009, Richard Lyons wrote: > I used to think standard batteries were a better idea too, but they don't > perform anywhere near as well as the L-ion flat ones most cameras now use. This is slightly misleading. Yes, lb for lb, LI batts perform better, but often if a camera u

Re: digital camera recomendations

On 2009-02-19T16:05:55, Richard Lyons wrote: > The rechargeeables, both NiCad and NiMH, are a good idea in principle, but > lose charge when not in use and become ineffective surprisingly quickly in > my experience. Try the low discharge NiMH batteries like Sanyo Eneloop. /Allan -- Allan Wind L

Re: digital camera recomendations

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:55:12AM -0500, Barclay, Daniel wrote: > Mike McClain wrote: > > > > > AA batteries are cheap, readily available and I can get NiCad and NiMH. > > Custom rechargable battery packs are like printer ink cartridges. > > I wonder whether any camera use AAA batteries. Tha

Re: digital camera recomendations

Mike McClain wrote: > > AA batteries are cheap, readily available and I can get NiCad and NiMH. > Custom rechargable battery packs are like printer ink cartridges. I wonder whether any camera use AAA batteries. That would let the camera be smaller and you'd still be able to install non-recharg

Re: digital camera recomendations

kj wrote: > ... I can imagine there's some benefit to designing a battery > that delivers the cameras exact energy requirements rather than trying > to make the most of the fixed output of AAs. Given how small compact > digital cameras have become, AA batteries really just add unnecessary bul

Re: digital camera recomendations

kj wrote: ...The T100's battery is tiny compared to two AAs, and gave me roughly double number of pictures that I got out of two 2700mAh NiCads. Correction: they're 2700mAh NiMh batteries. Amazon linky: *http://tinyurl.com/dny49q --kj * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.d

Re: digital camera recomendations

Mike McClain wrote: A batteries are cheap, readily available and I can get NiCad and NiMH. Custom rechargable battery packs are like printer ink cartridges. Mike Except they last a lot longer - in both ways. I am not an electronic engineer, but I can imagine there's some benefit to designi

Re: digital camera recomendations

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Mike McClain wrote: > I'm in the market for an inexpensive digital camera. Just for > snapshots and was wondering if anyone had recommendations or > knows where I could find which are going to work with Debian. > Just something simple with USB, AA batteries and tha

Re: digital camera recomendations

On 02/18/2009 11:34 AM, Mike McClain wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +, kj wrote: Mike McClain wrote: I'm in the market for an inexpensive digital camera. Out of curiosity, why AA? Losing the AA will give you a much more compact camera. Very few cameras accept AA batteries t

Re: digital camera recomendations

Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +, kj wrote: >> Mike McClain wrote: >>> I'm in the market for an inexpensive digital camera. >>> Just for snapshots and was wondering if anyone had recommendations >>> or knows where I could find which are going to work with Debi

Re: digital camera recomendations

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +, kj wrote: > Mike McClain wrote: >> I'm in the market for an inexpensive digital camera. >> Just for snapshots and was wondering if anyone had recommendations >> or knows where I could find which are going to work with Debian. >> Just something simple with U

Re: digital camera recomendations

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +, kj wrote: > Mike McClain wrote: > >I'm in the market for an inexpensive digital camera. > > Out of curiosity, why AA? Losing the AA will give you a much more > compact camera. Very few cameras accept AA batteries these days > anyway.Either ways,

Re: digital camera recomendations

Mike McClain wrote: I'm in the market for an inexpensive digital camera. Just for snapshots and was wondering if anyone had recommendations or knows where I could find which are going to work with Debian. Just something simple with USB, AA batteries and that uses a generic mem card. Thanks, Mike

Re: digital camera recomendations

On Sat February 14 2009, Mike McClain wrote: > I'm in the market for an inexpensive digital camera. > Just for snapshots and was wondering if anyone had recommendations > or knows where I could find which are going to work with Debian. > Just something simple with USB, AA batteries and that uses a

Re: digital camera recomendations

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:18:32PM -0500, H.S. wrote: > Allan Wind wrote: > > > Most cameras support mass storage device class these days. > > > >> AA batteries > > How about Canon Powershot A620 or a more recent model in these series? we just bought a power shot g10 love it and it works well w

Re: digital camera recomendations

Allan Wind wrote: > Most cameras support mass storage device class these days. > >> AA batteries How about Canon Powershot A620 or a more recent model in these series? > That is probably what limits your choices the most. > >> and that uses a generic >> mem card. > > You may want to make tha

Re: digital camera recomendations

On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 15:30 -0800, Mike McClain wrote: > I'm in the market for an inexpensive digital camera. > Just for snapshots and was wondering if anyone had recommendations > or knows where I could find which are going to work with Debian. > Just something simple with USB, AA batteries and th

Re: digital camera recomendations

On 2009-02-14T15:30:41, Mike McClain wrote: > I'm in the market for an inexpensive digital camera. > Just for snapshots and was wondering if anyone had recommendations > or knows where I could find which are going to work with Debian. > Just something simple with USB, Most cameras support mass sto

Re: Digital Camera

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:51 PM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's also lsusb: > > (0) phreaque [root] /root_ lsusb > Bus 003 Device 001: ID : > Bus 002 Device 001: ID : > Bus 001 Device 006: ID 03e8:2186 EndPoints, Inc. Most likely that's the bus ID of the camer

Re: Digital Camera

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:51:00AM +0100, s. keeling wrote: > David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:27 AM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (1) phreaque /home/keeling_ gphoto2 --auto-detect > > > Model Port > > > ---

Re: Digital Camera

David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:27 AM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (1) phreaque /home/keeling_ gphoto2 --auto-detect > > Model Port > > -- > > (0) phreaque /home/keeling_ >

Re: Digital Camera

Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 03/26/08 07:27, s. keeling wrote: > > > > (1) phreaque /home/keeling_ gphoto2 --auto-detect > > Model Port > > -- > > (0) phreaque /home/keeling_ > > Buy a new camera? They

Re: Digital Camera

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/26/08 07:27, s. keeling wrote: > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On 03/25/08 19:00, s. keeling wrote: >>> David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:34 PM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've one seriou

Re: Digital Camera

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:27 AM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (1) phreaque /home/keeling_ gphoto2 --auto-detect > Model Port > -- > (0) phreaque /home/keeling_ So it doesn't detect it at all, then. Bumm

Re: Digital Camera

Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 03/25/08 19:00, s. keeling wrote: > > David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:34 PM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> I've one seriously cheapo Concord Eye-Q 1000 (1.3 Mpx res.). This > >>> model is not listed in gt

Re: Digital Camera

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:00 PM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > USB cable on PC end, looks like very small proprietary connector on > camera end. I don't think it's mini-USB, but I could be wrong. rant - I hate proprietary usb cables. I got screwed by that experience ;(. > No such lu

Re: Digital Camera

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/25/08 19:00, s. keeling wrote: > David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:34 PM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I've one seriously cheapo Concord Eye-Q 1000 (1.3 Mpx res.). This >>> model is not listed in gtka

Re: Digital Camera

David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:34 PM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've one seriously cheapo Concord Eye-Q 1000 (1.3 Mpx res.). This > > model is not listed in gtkam's database. Does digiKam handle it? > > There's no exact match in digikam (current

Re: Digital Camera

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:34 PM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've one seriously cheapo Concord Eye-Q 1000 (1.3 Mpx res.). This > model is not listed in gtkam's database. Does digiKam handle it? There's no exact match in digikam (current lenny) but there are some other close models

Re: Digital Camera

Nick Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Tyler Smith wrote: > >> Robert Thompson wrote: > >> > >>> Question is: How does digital cameras work with > >>> Debian? > > > > I've found gthumb to be a pretty good place to begin > > There are doubtless also KDE apps that do the same thing, if you > > prefer. >

Re: Digital Camera

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Adam Hardy shared this with us all: >--} nikon D60 on 23/03/08 20:37, wrote: >--} > http://www.nikond60.com Nikon D60 >--} > >--} > Robert Thompson wrote: >--} >> Hello All, >--} >>I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a > USB --} >> to >--} >> co

Re: Digital Camera

Tyler Smith wrote: Robert Thompson wrote: >> Question is: How does digital cameras work with Debian? > I've found gthumb to be a pretty good place to begin There are doubtless also KDE apps that do the same thing, if you prefer. For KDE there is 'digiKam' : http://www.digikam.org/about.ht

Re: Digital Camera

nikon D60 on 23/03/08 20:37, wrote: http://www.nikond60.com Nikon D60 Robert Thompson wrote: Hello All, I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB to connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with Debian? Try: sudo gphoto2 --auto-dete

Re: Digital Camera

http://www.nikond60.com Nikon D60 Robert Thompson wrote: > > Hello All, >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB > to > connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with > Debian? > > Thanks > Eric > > -- View this message in contex

Re: Digital Camera

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:37:56AM -0600, Kent West wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 02/20/08 22:01, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:50:12AM -0800, canona650 wrote: >>> http://www.canona560.com Canon A560 >>> What are you, some kin

Re: Digital Camera

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:37:56AM -0600, Kent West wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 02/20/08 22:01, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:50:12AM -0800, canona650 wrote: >>> http://www.canona560.com Canon A560 >>> What are you, some kind of canon

Re: digital camera software

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:51:18AM -0800, canona650 wrote: > > apt-cache search digital | grep camera > > photopc - Interface to digital still cameras > > phototk - GUI interface for digital cameras > > pencam - Download images from STV0680B-001 chip based digital cameras > > fujiplay - Interface

Re: Digital Camera

Ron Johnson wrote: On 02/20/08 22:01, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:50:12AM -0800, canona650 wrote: http://www.canona560.com Canon A560 What are you, some kind of canon spambot? Great minds think alike... And so do y'all's! ;-) -- Ke

Re: Digital Camera

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/20/08 22:01, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:50:12AM -0800, canona650 wrote: >> http://www.canona560.com Canon A560 >> >> > > What are you, some kind of canon spambot? Great minds think alike... - -- Ron Johnson, Jr

Re: Digital Camera

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:50:12AM -0800, canona650 wrote: > > http://www.canona560.com Canon A560 > > What are you, some kind of canon spambot? A > Robert Thompson wrote: > > > > Hello All, > >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB > > to > > connect to

Re: Digital Camera

> >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB > > to > > connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with > > Debian? The Sony i have (Cybershot DSC U10) has memory-sticks so it works just like any other mass-storage usb device. -- Fica bem

Re: digital camera software

http://www.canona560.com Canon A560 Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:12:47AM +0200, Bayrouni wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I need nice software for my digcameraital . >> But I have'nt any idea which software is fine for accessng, reading, ... >> all enabled info and data

Re: Digital Camera

http://www.canona560.com Canon A560 Robert Thompson wrote: > > Hello All, >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB > to > connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with > Debian? > > Thanks > Eric > > -- View this message in con

Re: Digital Camera

> Robert Thompson wrote: >> >> Hello All, >>I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB >> to >> connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with >> Debian? >> I'm just getting started with my new digital camera, and I've found gthumb to be

Re: Digital Camera

On 12/26/07, canonsx100 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.canonsx100.com > > Robert Thompson wrote: > > > > Hello All, > >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB > > to > > connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with > > Debian

Re: Digital Camera

http://www.canonsx100.com Robert Thompson wrote: > > Hello All, >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB > to > connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with > Debian? > > Thanks > Eric > > -- View this message in context: http:

Re: Digital Camera Flash Memory won't Mount

Micha Feigin wrote: The problem is not the usb port but whether the kernel negotiates with the device properly. Try to first connect the reader without the card and then do immediately cat /proc/bus/usb/devices (lsusb should work also). If the device is negotiated with properly, this should ret

Re: Digital Camera Flash Memory won't Mount

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:56:38 -0500 Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Micha Feigin wrote: > > Hey, thanks for the kind reply. > > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 02:32:51 -0500 > > Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Ron Johnson wrote: > >> > >>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: Digital Camera Flash Memory won't Mount

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike McCarty wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > >> "Flash Memory" is too ambiguous. SD, MMC, CF, or (probably, since >> this is Sony) Memory Stick? >> > > SanDisk 128 mg SDMS 0343SD7 Ok, it's a Memory Stick. Try this $ dmesg | tail -n40 Insert the MS,

Re: Digital Camera Flash Memory won't Mount

Micha Feigin wrote: Hey, thanks for the kind reply. On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 02:32:51 -0500 Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike McCarty wrote: My girlfriend has a Sony Mavica MVC FD200 with Flash Memory [and can't g

Re: Digital Camera Flash Memory won't Mount

Ron Johnson wrote: "Flash Memory" is too ambiguous. SD, MMC, CF, or (probably, since this is Sony) Memory Stick? SanDisk 128 mg SDMS 0343SD7 Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} This message made from 100% recycled bits. You have found the bank of Larn

Re: Digital Camera Flash Memory won't Mount

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 02:32:51 -0500 Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Mike McCarty wrote: > > > >>My girlfriend has a Sony Mavica MVC FD200 with Flash Memory > > [and can't get it to mount] > > > > > > "F

Re: Digital Camera Flash Memory won't Mount

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 02:16:37PM +0200, Manon Metten wrote: > Mike McCarty wrote: > >My girlfriend has a Sony Mavica MVC FD200 with Flash Memory > >cards. The card reader is a Dazzle USB card reader. It mounts > >just fine with Windows XP, but does not mount with Debian. Hi. Jumping into the mi

Re: Digital Camera Flash Memory won't Mount

Mike McCarty wrote: My girlfriend has a Sony Mavica MVC FD200 with Flash Memory cards. The card reader is a Dazzle USB card reader. It mounts just fine with Windows XP, but does not mount with Debian. Googling around produced simply reports of problems reading these things at all. One recommende

Re: Digital Camera Flash Memory won't Mount

Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike McCarty wrote: My girlfriend has a Sony Mavica MVC FD200 with Flash Memory [and can't get it to mount] "Flash Memory" is too ambiguous. SD, MMC, CF, or (probably, since this is Sony) Memory Stick? [snip] Thanks for

Re: Digital Camera Flash Memory won't Mount

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike McCarty wrote: > My girlfriend has a Sony Mavica MVC FD200 with Flash Memory > cards. The card reader is a Dazzle USB card reader. It mounts > just fine with Windows XP, but does not mount with Debian. > > Googling around produced simply reports

Re: Digital Camera

Hi Hugo, Am 2006-01-08 12:41:17, schrieb Hugo Vanwoerkom: > I got a Cannon A410. > I gambled on its support, but gphoto2 supports the A400 model. > Won the bet: plug in the USB, issue gphot2 -P and download all the pics. > > But that gamble may not work. If you do not get it to work, please con

Re: Digital Camera

Am 2006-01-07 19:31:36, schrieb Robert Thompson: > Hello All, >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB to > connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with > Debian? It depends on libgphoto2. Which Camera do you have? > Thanks > Eric G

Re: Digital Camera

On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 19:31 -0500, Robert Thompson wrote: > Hello All, >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a > USB to connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras > work with Debian? I have a Kodak 4530 that works great with Linux. The SD card c

Re: Digital Camera

On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:07:22AM +, Anthony Campbell wrote: > On 08 Jan 2006, Roman Makurin wrote: > > ? ? ?? ??? 08 ?? 2006 03:31 Robert Thompson ???(a): > > > Hello All, > > >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB > > > to connect

Re: Digital Camera

On 08 Jan 2006, Roman Makurin wrote: > ? ? ?? ??? 08 ?? 2006 03:31 Robert Thompson ???(a): > > Hello All, > >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB > > to connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with > > Debian?

Re: Digital Camera

Robert Thompson wrote: Hello All, I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB to connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with Debian? I got a Cannon A410. I gambled on its support, but gphoto2 supports the A400 model. Won the bet: pl

Re: Digital Camera

On Sunday 08 January 2006 09:29, Z F wrote: >The only problem with using camera in linux is often there is no way >to access raw images from the camera, only jpeg or tiff. > Well, in the case of my now ageing (like me :) Olympus C3020, that is not an available choice unless you go into the camera'

Re: Digital Camera

On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:29:23AM -0800, Z F wrote: > > The only problem with using camera in linux is often there is no way > to access raw images from the camera, only jpeg or tiff. Try typing apt-cache show dcraw ufraw for answers to this. Kenward > --- mvephoto <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Digital Camera - "RAW"

Uuhh.. not quite. http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/ and read all about how without the fantastic effort of open source even PhotoShop would still be far behind in the RAW sector. I have used the RAW plug-in in GIMP, as well as from command line, and it works. There are samples online

Re: Digital Camera

The only problem with using camera in linux is often there is no way to access raw images from the camera, only jpeg or tiff. --- mvephoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. Generally speaking, pretty good. However, I tend to move away > from the > issue of having a digital camera "work" with my

Re: Digital Camera

В сообщении от Воскресенье 08 января 2006 03:31 Robert Thompson написал(a): > Hello All, >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB > to connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with > Debian? > Try digikam if you are kde user :) otherwis

Re: Digital Camera

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:31 am, Robert Thompson wrote: > Hello All, >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB to > connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with > Debian? > > Thanks > Eric > I have one, an

Re: Digital Camera

> On January 7, 2006 06:31 pm, Robert Thompson wrote: > > Hello All, > >I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB > > to connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with > > Debian? I have a Sony DSC P8 and it is just a mass storage device.

Re: Digital Camera

Hi. Generally speaking, pretty good. However, I tend to move away from the issue of having a digital camera "work" with my computer(s), and use a card-reader instead. This is a] usually faster, b] saves on battery life of the camera and c] a cardreader is most likely "plug and play" and will be

Re: digital camera software

Hi. This may depend on your camera type. Mine is a kodak, and I made it work with ptpcam ( http://libptp.sourceforge.net/ ) Hope this helps Bayrouni wrote: Hello all, I need nice software for my digcameraital . But I have'nt any idea which software is fine for accessng, reading, ... all ena

Re: digital camera software

On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 08:47:13PM -0300, Romulo Sousa wrote: > Can one of these software make "slides" w/ pics? You know...select > some pics, playing a song on the background and then burn a dvd to > watch the animation? Sorry, but i have no idea how these softwares are > called. > > Thanks a l

Re: digital camera software

On 9/19/05, Antonio Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:12:47AM +0200, Bayrouni wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I need nice software for my digcameraital . > > But I have'nt any idea which software is fine for accessng, reading, ... > > all enabled info and data on the c

Re: digital camera software

On mandag 19 september 2005, 10:12, Bayrouni wrote: > I need nice software for my digcameraital . > But I have'nt any idea which software is fine for accessng, reading, > ... all enabled info and data on the camera. If you use KDE, I can recommend digikam. Even though there are many features on m

Re: digital camera software

On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:12:47AM +0200, Bayrouni wrote: > Hello all, > > I need nice software for my digcameraital . > But I have'nt any idea which software is fine for accessng, reading, ... > all enabled info and data on the camera. > > Thank you. > Bayrouni apt-cache search digital | grep

Re: digital camera (100 - 200 USD price range)

On Sunday 02 January 2005 02:32, David Mandelberg wrote: > My sister is looking to get a digital camera, and I'm trying to find > one that is compatible with ubuntu or another easy to use debian > derivative (or debian itself if sarge/etch is user friendly enough). > > Any suggestions appreciated.

Re: digital camera (100 - 200 USD price range)

> http://www.dcresource.com/ which is recommended by gphoto.org, is an > awesome site or http://www.dpreview.com :-) it's a great website for digital photography. regards, Han Lin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: digital camera (100 - 200 USD price range)

On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 20:32:47 -0500, David Mandelberg wrote: > My sister is looking to get a digital camera, and I'm trying to find one > that is compatible with ubuntu or another easy to use debian derivative > (or debian itself if sarge/etch is user friendly enough). > > Any suggestions apprecia

Re: digital camera question

On Thursday 15 April 2004 6:18 pm, Mike Chandler wrote: > I wonder if I have to add stuff to fstab,-- I can access the camera as 'root' > now, but not as a user. That screams permissions problem check the ownership of the devices and act accordingly -- Congratulations, you have just reinvented

Re: digital camera question

Mike Chandler([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Thursday 15 April 2004 08:33 am, steef wrote: > > H. S. wrote: > > > Apparently, _Mike Chandler_, on 04/15/04 10:09,typed: [-Big Snip-] > Thanks for that, I tried to apt-get usbmgr, but it wanted to uninstall > hotplug. > I'm not sur

Re: digital camera question

Mike Chandler wrote: On Thursday 15 April 2004 08:33 am, steef wrote: H. S. wrote: Apparently, _Mike Chandler_, on 04/15/04 10:09,typed: Now, using Debian testing, with kernel 2.4.25-1-386, have installed gphoto, (and the front end gtkam). So I run gtkam and it will detect my camera

Re: digital camera question

Mike Chandler wrote: On Thursday 15 April 2004 04:20 pm, Christophe Barbe wrote: Le jeu 15/04/2004 à 19:10, Mike Chandler a écrit : Thanks Christophe! Where exactly can I find the README.Debian file? Please. /usr/share/doc/libgphoto2-2/README.Debian Christophe Man, thanks a lo

Re: digital camera question

On Thursday 15 April 2004 04:20 pm, Christophe Barbe wrote: > Le jeu 15/04/2004 à 19:10, Mike Chandler a écrit : > > Thanks Christophe! > > Where exactly can I find the README.Debian file? > > Please. > > /usr/share/doc/libgphoto2-2/README.Debian > > Christophe Man, thanks a lot! That README file

Re: digital camera question

On Thursday 15 April 2004 03:22 pm, Brad Sims wrote: > On Thursday 15 April 2004 9:09 am, Mike Chandler wrote: > > Unable to initialize camera. Check your port settings and camera > > connectivity and try again. > > First give this a read... >

Re: digital camera question

Le jeu 15/04/2004 à 19:10, Mike Chandler a écrit : > Thanks Christophe! > Where exactly can I find the README.Debian file? > Please. /usr/share/doc/libgphoto2-2/README.Debian Christophe

Re: digital camera question

On Thursday 15 April 2004 01:14 pm, christophe barbe wrote: > Looks like a permission problem. > Install gphoto2 >apt-get install gphoto2 > then try as root >gphoto2 --autodetect -L > If you get a list of pictures in the cam, try the same as a normal user. > If it works as root and not as a

Re: digital camera question

On Thursday 15 April 2004 08:33 am, steef wrote: > H. S. wrote: > > Apparently, _Mike Chandler_, on 04/15/04 10:09,typed: > >> Now, using Debian testing, with kernel 2.4.25-1-386, have installed > >> gphoto, (and the front end gtkam). > >> So I run gtkam and it will detect my camera, however there

Re: digital camera question

On Thursday 15 April 2004 9:09 am, Mike Chandler wrote: > Unable to initialize camera. Check your port settings and camera connectivity > and try again. First give this a read... Steps two and three sound like what you are looking for... Or

Re: digital camera question

Looks like a permission problem. Install gphoto2 apt-get install gphoto2 then try as root gphoto2 --autodetect -L If you get a list of pictures in the cam, try the same as a normal user. If it works as root and not as a normal user, read the README.Debian file. Christophe On Thu, Apr 15,

Re: digital camera question

Incoming from GodMode: > hey guys > i added deb http://download.kde.org/stable/3.2/Debian/ stable main Are you sure it exists in stable? Maybe you need backports? > did an apt-get update > and apt-get upgrade ( which upgraded a few kde packages) > but now i'm trying a > apt-get install kde3 > ap

Re: digital camera question

hey guys i added deb http://download.kde.org/stable/3.2/Debian/ stable main did an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade ( which upgraded a few kde packages) but now i'm trying a apt-get install kde3 apt-get install kde3.2 apt-get install kde=3 i dont know what command to use to get kde3 using apt-

Re: digital camera question

H. S. wrote: Apparently, _Mike Chandler_, on 04/15/04 10:09,typed: Now, using Debian testing, with kernel 2.4.25-1-386, have installed gphoto, (and the front end gtkam). So I run gtkam and it will detect my camera, however there is an error: Could not initialize camera. If I try and use kde co

Re: digital camera question

Apparently, _Mike Chandler_, on 04/15/04 10:09,typed: Now, using Debian testing, with kernel 2.4.25-1-386, have installed gphoto, (and the front end gtkam). So I run gtkam and it will detect my camera, however there is an error: Could not initialize camera. If I try and use kde control center >p

Re: Digital camera corrupted images

> I have debian unstable up-to-date and a kodak dx3500 > I download images and they get corrupted, while I see them fine on the > camera. > moreover, I had an onld memory card with pictures (I previously > downloaded) and when downloading them now > they are corrupt (images haf gray, bad colors).

Re: digital camera recommendation?

I would recomend something with a Sandisk or Compact Flash. I had a camera and all I had to buy for Linux support was a 25 dollar dongle that plugged into the USB. The carts that went into the Camera acted like a scsi hdd once I modprobed usb-storage. -- Arthur H. Johnson II, Debian GNU/Linux

  1   2   >