On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 09:19 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I manually edit that grub.cfg.
So do I :).
And again I like to inform the OP, that syslinux is a bootloader used by
many experienced Linux users who dislike grub. I never tested syslinux,
but it's said, that's it the best bootloader.
-
Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
Tom H wrote:
Let's assume that you have two Linux installations on sda, on sda1 and
sda2, and that grub is embedded in the mbr of sda for sda1 and in the
pbr/vbr of sda2 for sda2.
I have two distinct use cases
1. one mach
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>>
>> Let's assume that you have two Linux installations on sda, on sda1 and
>> sda2, and that grub is embedded in the mbr of sda for sda1 and in the
>> pbr/vbr of sda2 for sda2.
>
> I have two distinct use cases
> 1. one machi
erm,
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> [...]
> In the chain-loading approach, every partition has some extra space in
> it's structure header, just like the disk itself has some extra space in
> the master boot record, [...]
>
I think I should have said,
... the disk itse
(Thanks for starting this thread, Richard, I finally found out how to
access the grub lists.)
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Richard Owlett
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thank you. My individual use case appears to be adequately
Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
Thank you. My individual use case appears to be adequately safe, perhaps
more due to good luck than good management. However a couple of side
comments plus something I read somewhere hints at a more elegant solution.
Will have
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> Thank you. My individual use case appears to be adequately safe, perhaps
> more due to good luck than good management. However a couple of side
> comments plus something I read somewhere hints at a more elegant solution.
> Will have to some
Brian wrote:
On Thu 03 Apr 2014 at 14:32:26 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
I posted this to help-g...@gnu.org a week ago and got no response.
Specifically I'm using GRUB 1.98 as installed by Squeeze.
"
I wish to install GRUB2 in a way that is actively discouraged.
I wish to install it in a dedic
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 03 Apr 2014 at 14:32:26 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>> I posted this to help-g...@gnu.org a week ago and got no response.
>> Specifically I'm using GRUB 1.98 as installed by Squeeze.
>>
>> "
>> I wish to install GRUB2 in a way that is active
On Thu 03 Apr 2014 at 14:32:26 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I posted this to help-g...@gnu.org a week ago and got no response.
> Specifically I'm using GRUB 1.98 as installed by Squeeze.
>
> "
> I wish to install GRUB2 in a way that is actively discouraged.
> I wish to install it in a dedicated
Dziêkujê za wiadomo¶æ. Pragnê poinformowaæ, i¿ do 23.09.04 przebywam na urlopie.
Podrawiam
Wies³aw B³aszczuk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have received your message and will respond to it shortly.
Webmaster
from-home-jobs.com
Original Message
> Please read the attached file.
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:21:30 -0400
Mike M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Following up this:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/05/msg00612.html
>
> I was wondering what this magic is doing:
>
> # echo 'APT::Cache-Limit "25165824";' >> /etc/apt/apt.conf
>
> which works for me, BTW. I have
Diese E-Mail Adresse ist aus technischen Gründen inaktiv. Bitte treten Sie direkt mit
unserer Niederlassung Hamburg in Kontakt:
040/ 419 192 70
Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis
Ihre Akzent GmbH
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Thank you for choosing HoosierMedia.com for you web site hosting needs! A
HoosierMedia.com site specialist is currently configuring your hosting account.
You will receive a second e-mail within 1 business day including all of the necessary
instructions for uploading your web site to HoosierMed
Title: Spam Arrest Sender Verification
Support here,I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail.
Just this once, click the link below so I can receive your emails.
You won't have to do this again.
http://spamarrest.com/a?900501601:807501
You are receiving this message in response to
zadost se subjektem "Re: Details" vyresime v co nejkratsim moznem terminu.
Dekujeme za duveru.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sales and Marketing Department
Czech On Line, a.s.
U Nakladoveho nadrazi 8
130 00 Praha 3
Tel.: 420 246 000 345
Fax.: 420 246 000 118
ID ticketu
This message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was deleted as it is suspected of containing a Virus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has
been automatically rejected. If you think that your messages are
being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Message ---
See the attached file for details--- End Message ---
Thank you for taking the time to contact Global Crossing's Abuse
Team concerning potential Internet abuse by one of our customers.
Your message will be read and acted on by a human, however due to the
large volume of email we handle every day, we may not be able to
respond to you individually.
In
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030820 07:16]:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:08:53AM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> > LOL!
> >
> > Challenge-Response works so well, eh?
> >
> > You have to laugh when you see stuff like this. At least until it
> > effectively causes a DoS :-).
>
>
This message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was deleted as it is suspected of containing a Virus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:08:53AM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> LOL!
>
> Challenge-Response works so well, eh?
>
> You have to laugh when you see stuff like this. At least until it
> effectively causes a DoS :-).
You mean we are all suppose to respond? ;)
How big is debian-user, anyw
LOL!
Challenge-Response works so well, eh?
You have to laugh when you see stuff like this. At least until it
effectively causes a DoS :-).
-D
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 08:44:30PM -0700, [-name protected-] wrote:
| Hi,
|
| This is an AUTOMATED RESPONSE...
[rest snipped]
--
An anxious heart we
Title: Spam Arrest Sender Verification
Hi,
This is an AUTOMATED RESPONSE...
Mike Thacker, HERE-or-
Simply the Best, Inc, -or-
Home Connections-USA
I am protecting myself from receiving SO MUCH junk/spam mail (over 1,000 a DAY).
So, you will have to REPLY to this message just ONCE, and
25 matches
Mail list logo
