-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 20 August 2004 06:57, John Summerfield wrote:
> It might seem a little extreme, but insubscribing all gmail users with an
> explanatory note would get gmail to sort it out fairly quickly: it would be
> snowed under with complaints.
I don't t
On Friday 20 August 2004 00:52, Carl Fink wrote:
> BTW, I didn't see a single delayed message during the whole affair. I
> wonder if this is because I subscribed to this list so many years ago. If
> the list manager sends out messages in the order in which people subscribed,
> every single gmail
Jacob S. wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 19:52:54 -0400
Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, I didn't see a single delayed message during the whole affair. I
wonder if this is because I subscribed to this list so many years ago.
If the list manager sends out messages in the order in which peopl
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 07:52:54PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> BTW, I didn't see a single delayed message during the whole affair. I
> wonder if this is because I subscribed to this list so many years ago.
> If the list manager sends out messages in the order in which people
> subscribed, every sing
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 07:52:54PM -0400 or thereabouts, Carl Fink wrote:
> BTW, I didn't see a single delayed message during the whole affair. I
> wonder if this is because I subscribed to this list so many years ago. If
> the list manager sends out messages in the order in which people subscrib
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 19:52:54 -0400
Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I didn't see a single delayed message during the whole affair. I
> wonder if this is because I subscribed to this list so many years ago.
> If the list manager sends out messages in the order in which people
> subscrib
BTW, I didn't see a single delayed message during the whole affair. I
wonder if this is because I subscribed to this list so many years ago. If
the list manager sends out messages in the order in which people subscribed,
every single gmail customer would be listed after me.
--
Carl Fink
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:51:46AM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
> His problem seems to be caused by the major ISPs recently implementing
> Greylisting, causing a backup que when sending large volumes outbound.
Properly-implented greylisting only applies to a given mail server
*once*, ever.
--
Carl Fink
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 08:52:53AM -0500 or thereabouts, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> There's a fairly interesting article about teergrubing at:
> http://www.iks-jena.de/mitarb/lutz/usenet/teergrube.en.html
>
> At the moment, I'm guessing that (b) happened. I'm still trying to get
> more information, so
'lo,
I got some emails asking me what teergrubing was after this post which I
managed to delete before replying to. Hopefully the people who were
wondering about it will catch this message.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 03:40:34AM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Delays were caused on this l
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 03:40:34AM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A number of people have commented about not getting mail from
> the debian-user list. There should not be nearly as many delays in
> getting mail for most users now.
>
> Delays were caused on this list by the high
11 matches
Mail list logo
