> > To all the kind folks
> > who've spent many long nights making Debian Linux a quality
> > product, thank you.
I *must* agree. A year ago, I gave up trying to get a SCO Unix box
(3.2v4.2) running all the Internet services I wanted. Every single service
I wanted to get running was a complete P
On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, System Account (what a cute name!:) wrote:
> Wait!! Hold this upgrade!! Hehe sorry all but i was about to try
> the upgrade tomorrow but i was going to use bo. What am i suppossed to
> use Bo or Frozen???
Frozen, I think. BTW I always use unstable for this purpose.
>
>
> Wait!! Hold this upgrade!! Hehe sorry all but i was about to try
> the upgrade tomorrow but i was going to use bo. What am i suppossed to
> use Bo or Frozen???
frozen is actually a symlink currently pointing to bo/
In a couple of days a symlynk "stable" will point to the same directory
On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Jim Pick wrote:
> Just set dselect to point at: frozen non-free contrib
Wait!! Hold this upgrade!! Hehe sorry all but i was about to try
the upgrade tomorrow but i was going to use bo. What am i suppossed to
use Bo or Frozen???
Also i am going to setup a mirro
On Jun 1, stephen farrell wrote
>
> Perhaps I didn't set up shadow stuff correctly? I kind of stumbled
> upon it: I noticed references to it, and I typed pwconv (which I
> recognized from my solaris systems) and things seemed to work pretty
> happily (except xlock), so I figured that this was it.
>
>--n2rw/3z4jIqBvZU5
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>On Jun 1, stephen farrell wrote
>>
>> Hm... I've found (so far...) on rather important flaw. Perhaps I'm
>> missing it, but it appears that xlockmore doesn't know about shadow
>> passwords?
>
>Are you sure you're running the
On Jun 1, stephen farrell wrote
>
> Hm... I've found (so far...) on rather important flaw. Perhaps I'm
> missing it, but it appears that xlockmore doesn't know about shadow
> passwords?
Are you sure you're running the latest version from frozen? (i.e. 4.02-1)
It's got not problem with my shado
On Jun 1, Randy Edwards wrote
>
>I read a fragment of one message somewhere that 1.3 is actually in the
> frozen subdirectory; is that true? If I were to make my dselect point at
> stable, non-free, contrib, and frozen would that cause the upgrade? Or
> should I wait until it's moved from fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Randy Edwards wrote:
> > compared to upgrading Debian 1.2 to 1.3, it sucks. To all the kind
> > folks who've spent many long nights making Debian Linux a quality
> > product, thank you.
>
>I have to agree. After switching to Linux I'm
> Just replace stable with frozen in dselect and things should work fine. I
> upgraded by ftp over a ppp link (~39 MB) and it went as slick as can be
> (it took a few hours of course.)
>
> After struggling with two Red Hat upgrades and getting a system which
> worked but could only be upgraded
>
> BTW, while I was waiting for the BSDI upgrade, I upgraded my secondary
> DNS server (a Debian box). It took about an hour :) I'm still working
> on BSDI ...
If Software in the Public Interest charged big bucks for Debian support,
Debian might be a bear to install too ;)
It is probably jus
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Just replace stable with frozen in dselect and things should work fine. I
Hm... I've found (so far...) on rather important flaw. Perhaps I'm
missing it, but it appears that xlockmore doesn't know about shadow
passwords?
--sf
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE F
On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Randy Edwards wrote:
> > compared to upgrading Debian 1.2 to 1.3, it sucks. To all the kind
> > folks who've spent many long nights making Debian Linux a quality
> > product, thank you.
>
>I have to agree. After switching to Linux I'm constantly impressed
> with everythi
On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> BTW, while I was waiting for the BSDI upgrade, I upgraded my secondary
> DNS server (a Debian box). It took about an hour :) I'm still working
> on BSDI ...
You get what you pay for :-)
Bob
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the wo
Randy Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>And, speaking of that, can I ask a stupid question? Okay.
> What/where/when is Debian 1.3 going to be released? I'm using 1.2,
> getting upgrades through the net with dselect in its default setup
> pointing at debian.org and the stable, non-free, an
>And, speaking of that, can I ask a stupid question? Okay.
> What/where/when is Debian 1.3 going to be released? I'm using 1.2,
> getting upgrades through the net with dselect in its default setup
> pointing at debian.org and the stable, non-free, and contrib
> subdirectories.
>
>I read
> compared to upgrading Debian 1.2 to 1.3, it sucks. To all the kind
> folks who've spent many long nights making Debian Linux a quality
> product, thank you.
I have to agree. After switching to Linux I'm constantly impressed
with everything about Debian (I ran SLS and then Slackware before).
17 matches
Mail list logo
