On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> I advised Joel to look over the licenses of the individual programs in
> non-free, and decide what he could legally include. I don't know if he'll
> have space.
Since there has been discussion of splitting up non-free, how about
creating a 'non-dist' for
Actually, it looks as if "contrib" made it onto the CD, but non-free did
not.
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key.
PGP fingerprint = 88 6A 15 D0 65 D4 A3 A6 1F 89 6A 76 95 24 87 B3
--
This message was delayed because the list mail
I think the license should be placed in the archive next to the package
so that it is easy to read.
Regarding InfoMagic, I think this time he only has one CD for Debian,
and thus some stuff like "contrib" and "non-free" might not make it on
to the CD.
Thanks
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens
On Mon, 9 Dec 1996, Adam Shand wrote:
> >What I would like to see added to non-free (more than stable/unstable) is
> >the copyright files for each package, already unpacked, so the packages
> >don't need to be unpacked to be investigated. This would make it a lot
> >less work determining which pac
On Mon, 9 Dec 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Regarding InfoMagic, I think this time he only has one CD for Debian,
> and thus some stuff like "contrib" and "non-free" might not make it on
> to the CD.
>
Hmm, the last InfoMagic Developer's Resource had only room for Debian on
not even a whole disk. I
I advised Joel to look over the licenses of the individual programs in
non-free, and decide what he could legally include. I don't know if he'll
have space.
Thanks
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key.
PGP fingerprint = 88 6A
>What I would like to see added to non-free (more than stable/unstable) is
>the copyright files for each package, already unpacked, so the packages
>don't need to be unpacked to be investigated. This would make it a lot
>less work determining which packages might be included under various
>circumst
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Shaya Potter wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Shaya Potter wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
> > >
> > > > The whole idea for the "non-free" area is that it belongs to programs
> > > > with
> > > > difficult
Hi Paul, You wrote:
Paul>
Paul> On Sat, 7 Dec 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
Paul> Please advice Joel Goldberger to include the
Paul> non-free stuff as well because lots of people -- like me ;-) --
Paul> *do* need this software. I already wrote him a message asking
Paul> to do so but your word may
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
> The whole idea for the "non-free" area is that it belongs to programs with
> difficult copyright notices such as it's not to be distributed etc. I
> seriously doubt that any CD manufacturer will include it on a distributed CD
> because it may well break
Hi Shaya, You wrote:
Shaya>
Shaya> On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
Shaya>
Shaya> This isn't exactly true. A package
Shaya> can go into non-free if commercial use is not allowed. A CD
Shaya> manufacturer can then put the package on the CD if they make a
Shaya> notice that commercial
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Shaya Potter wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
> >
> > > The whole idea for the "non-free" area is that it belongs to programs with
> > > difficult copyright notices such as it's not to be distributed etc. I
> > >
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Shaya Potter wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
>
> > The whole idea for the "non-free" area is that it belongs to programs with
> > difficult copyright notices such as it's not to be distributed etc. I
> > seriously doubt that any CD manufacturer will include
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
> At 03:09 PM 12/8/96 +0100, Paul Seelig wrote:
> >Please advice Joel Goldberger to include the non-free stuff as well
> >because lots of people -- like me ;-) -- *do* need this software. I
> >already wrote him a message asking to do so but your word may ha
On Sat, 7 Dec 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> They will have a real Debian 1.2 release on their CD. It's authorized.
> They've been holding off mastering the CD until I give the go-ahead.
> I will be sending them a list of MD5 checksums tomorrow morning just
> to be sure they get all of the files righ
From: David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Debian - Latest "stable" release (Debian GNU/Linux 1.2)
They will have a real Debian 1.2 release on their CD. It's authorized.
They've been holding off mastering the CD until I give the go-ahead.
I will be sending them a list of MD5 checksums tomorrow morn
16 matches
Mail list logo
