On Fri, Jun 27, 1997 at 12:54:01PM -0600, Rick Hawkins wrote:
> It would be nice if he got his facts straight, though.
>
> The need for six disks for cd installation, for example. I installed it
> on a friends cd with two, which was two more than I needed. I think one
> of the installs on this m
On Fri, Jun 27, 1997 at 05:51:24PM +, Leandro Asnaghi-Nicastro wrote:
> On This Day, In The Year Of Our Lord 27 Jun 97 at 14:31.
> "Re: Debian got slammed" by debian-user@lists.debian.org:
> > Saying Slackware is in any real way preferable to Debian is damn stupid.
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997 18:00:24 -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
>So, let me see what we have here. I don't think the following
>is any exaggeration. I've seen some of these points in this thread
>alone:
>
>o Within Debian, we're a happy lot except there's no
> concensys on issues such as dselect, bas
So, let me see what we have here. I don't think the following
is any exaggeration. I've seen some of these points in this thread
alone:
o Within Debian, we're a happy lot except there's no
concensys on issues such as dselect, base install
content, default customization, etc.
o Within Debi
From: "Leandro Asnaghi-Nicastro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I personally prefer the Debian machine, but the programmers
> say the RedHat is better, for options, {technical blabber here}, and
> bootable CD.
We fixed the bootable CD issue. The $4.95 Official 2-CD Set is bootable.
"options" probably mean
>Perhaps derogating this guy's views as "stupid" or "silly" serves no
>constructive purpose, especially when there is some validity there.
Where? I did my Debian install from my DOS hard drive, totally diskless. I
have no experience with Debian CDs, but feedback here seems to be
favorable. I m
On This Day, In The Year Of Our Lord 27 Jun 97 at 14:31.
"Re: Debian got slammed" by debian-user@lists.debian.org:
> Saying Slackware is in any real way preferable to Debian is damn stupid.
Depends from points of views, of course. At work we have three
machines running Lin
> Compaining about deficiencies is a valid, good thing.
>
> Saying Slackware is in any real way preferable to Debian is damn stupid.
There were three points when I contemplated switching to Debian
before I actually did, and each time I decided not to do so
until Debian got its act together. Som
It would be nice if he got his facts straight, though.
The need for six disks for cd installation, for example. I installed it
on a friends cd with two, which was two more than I needed. I think one
of the installs on this machine was entirely from dos with loadlin.
Even if one makes tow disks,
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997 13:40:34 -0400 (EDT), Will Lowe wrote:
>I was browsing a few newsgroups over lunch, and I ran across the
>following URL:
>http://mkracht.aye.net/~matt/linuxdist/
>
> The owner of the page compares RedHat, Slackware, and Debian.
>He's very pro-slackware, lukewarm on
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Dave Cinege wrote:
> >posting this information to encourage retaliation, flame wars, or
> >defensive-sounding responses on the part of _anyone_. The best response
> >is undoubtably _NO_ response.
>
> You must come to terms with the fact that some people were just born st
> sometimes it's useful to listen to the silly ones just to see what
> they're saying.
Perhaps derogating this guy's views as "stupid" or "silly" serves no
constructive purpose, especially when there is some validity there.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997 14:02:51 -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
>
>> sometimes it's useful to listen to the silly ones just to see what
>> they're saying.
>
>Perhaps derogating this guy's views as "stupid" or "silly" serves no
>constructive purpose, especially when there is some validity there.
Compainin
13 matches
Mail list logo
