On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:12:57 -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> In an announcement[1] from 2009, Debian promised to support Lenny at
> least until the release of Wheezy:
>
> "To accommodate the needs of larger organisations and other users with a
> long upgrade process, the Debian project commits to p
On 15/02/12 14:47, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 18:53, Scott Ferguson
> wrote:
>
>> And subsequently noted that Squeeze was *not* released when
>> anticipated. I presumed that meant the upgrade from Lenny to Wheezy
>> would not be happening. (I'm cynical about release schedules
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 18:53, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> And subsequently noted that Squeeze was *not* released when anticipated.
> I presumed that meant the upgrade from Lenny to Wheezy would not be
> happening. (I'm cynical about release schedules and "skip" upgrades)
I wish we saw this coming,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 18:29, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> This announcement was made in the context of the plan to freeze (and
> consequently release) squeeze very fast (one year after lenny). Plans
> were changed (as mentioned in subsequent announcements) and squeeze had
> the typical Debian release
On 15/02/12 09:12, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> In an announcement[1] from 2009, Debian promised to support Lenny at
> least until the release of Wheezy:
>
> "To accommodate the needs of larger organisations and other users
> with a long upgrade process, the Debian project commits to provide
> the poss
On Ma, 14 feb 12, 17:12:57, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> In an announcement[1] from 2009, Debian promised to support Lenny at
> least until the release of Wheezy:
>
> "To accommodate the needs of larger organisations and other users with
> a long upgrade process, the Debian project commits to provide th
6 matches
Mail list logo
