Am 2006-11-10 10:30:33, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> > >Am 2006-10-13 20:40:55, schrieb Roberto C. Sanchez:
> > >>With Planet Debian and the rest, you can just use RSS aggregation.
>
> > Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > >This would be quiet expensive over GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMTS while iMode
> > >and Ma
Am 2006-11-09 15:38:44, schrieb Nate Duehr:
> So they'll let you pull down a 100MB file from IMAP for free, (which
> still rides over GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMTS of course) but will charge money for
> a quick web pull of an RSS feed?
>
> Strange. They obviously don't know what they're doing.
;-)
It wa
> >Am 2006-10-13 20:40:55, schrieb Roberto C. Sanchez:
> >>With Planet Debian and the rest, you can just use RSS aggregation.
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >This would be quiet expensive over GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMTS while iMode
> >and Mailaccess (IMAP/POP3/SMTP) is free at my GSM provider.
On 09.11.06 1
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-10-13 20:40:55, schrieb Roberto C. Sanchez:
With Planet Debian and the rest, you can just use RSS aggregation.
This would be quiet expensive over GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMTS while iMode
and Mailaccess (IMAP/POP3/SMTP) is free at my GSM provider.
So they'll let you pull
Am 2006-10-13 20:40:55, schrieb Roberto C. Sanchez:
> With Planet Debian and the rest, you can just use RSS aggregation.
This would be quiet expensive over GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMTS while iMode
and Mailaccess (IMAP/POP3/SMTP) is free at my GSM provider.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzac
Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Oct 16 12:42 -0500]:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:50:41AM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
>From the September 26 DWN:
As Debian experiments with funding, the author of DWN is going to
experiment with spending le
* Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Oct 16 12:42 -0500]:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:50:41AM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> >>From the September 26 DWN:
> >>
> >>As Debian experiments with funding, the author of DWN is going to
> >>experiment with spending less t
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:50:41AM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
From the September 26 DWN:
As Debian experiments with funding, the author of DWN is going to experiment
with spending less time on Debian. Please understand that due to this there
may be no future issu
On Friday 13 October 2006 20:40, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 01:30:12AM +0100, Wulfy wrote:
> > Joey Hess wrote:
> > >I've considered taking over writing DWN again (if you're confused, I'm
> > >the other Joey who originally started it in '99). However, it's not
> > >clear to
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:20:15PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > From the September 26 DWN:
> >
> > As Debian experiments with funding, the author of DWN is going to
> > experiment
> > with spending less time on Debian. Please understand that due to this there
> > may be no future issues of D
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:40:55PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > The problem with this is the same as the problem with fora vs. mailing
> > lists. DWN comes to me... with Planet Debian and the rest, I have to
> > go to them to find out if there's anything of interest to me
> >
> Wi
* Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Oct 13 14:51 -0500]:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 11:43, Wulfy wrote:
> > I haven't had the last two edition of Debian Weekly News. I thought
> > that I'd somehow become unsubscribed from the list, but when I went to
> > the site, it seems I have all of
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 01:30:12AM +0100, Wulfy wrote:
The problem with this is the same as the problem with fora vs. mailing
lists. DWN comes to me... with Planet Debian and the rest, I have to
go to them to find out if there's anything of interest to me
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 01:30:12AM +0100, Wulfy wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> >I've considered taking over writing DWN again (if you're confused, I'm
> >the other Joey who originally started it in '99). However, it's not
> >clear to me that DWN is still relevant enough to be worth the large
> >amount
Joey Hess wrote:
I've considered taking over writing DWN again (if you're confused, I'm
the other Joey who originally started it in '99). However, it's not
clear to me that DWN is still relevant enough to be worth the large
amount of work it takes to maintain it[1]. A lot of communication is done
Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 12:10, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:50:41AM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> > > From the September 26 DWN:
> > >
> > > As Debian experiments with funding, the author of DWN is going to
> > > experiment with spending le
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 12:22:23PM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 12:10, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:50:41AM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> > > From the September 26 DWN:
> > >
> > > As Debian experiments with funding, the author of DWN is
On Friday 13 October 2006 12:10, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:50:41AM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> > From the September 26 DWN:
> >
> > As Debian experiments with funding, the author of DWN is going to
> > experiment with spending less time on Debian. Please understand
Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Friday 13 October 2006 11:43, Wulfy wrote:
I haven't had the last two edition of Debian Weekly News. I thought
that I'd somehow become unsubscribed from the list, but when I went to
the site, it seems I have all of them and the October editions that I'm
missing hav
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:50:41AM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
>
> From the September 26 DWN:
>
> As Debian experiments with funding, the author of DWN is going to experiment
> with spending less time on Debian. Please understand that due to this there
> may be no future issues of DWN in the
On Friday 13 October 2006 11:43, Wulfy wrote:
> I haven't had the last two edition of Debian Weekly News. I thought
> that I'd somehow become unsubscribed from the list, but when I went to
> the site, it seems I have all of them and the October editions that I'm
> missing haven't been sent.
>
> An
te: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:23:08 +0100
> > From: Andrew Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: portrserve, gidreserve, was Re: Debian Weekly News - October
> > 25th
> >
> > On 10/25/05, D. Joe Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:08:03PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Port Assignments during System Boot. Gernot Salzer [15]noticed that
> some network ports get assigned dynamically during the boot process
> and sometimes clash with daemons that use fixed ports. Javier
> Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a [16]
> > Reading these news items in the latest DWN, one could be drawn to the
> > conclusion that woody is dead. I would just like to know what other
people
> > who are more in the know think.
>
> No, it's just pretty slow. Progress since the release manager's most
At times I update woody twice a day
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 10:10:33AM -0800, Vaughan, Curtis wrote:
> Reading these news items in the latest DWN, one could be drawn to the
> conclusion that woody is dead. I would just like to know what other people
> who are more in the know think.
No, it's just pretty slow. Progress since the rel
Reading these news items in the latest DWN, one could be drawn to the
conclusion that woody is dead. I would just like to know what other people
who are more in the know think. Sometimes it makes me think, 'to hell with
Debian, go with another distro that's got a future.' But I really think
Debi
(This message was sent to Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
the -devel list. I screwed up the copy to -user.)
> Too Many Acronyms? The Debian mailing lists are rife with Linux gurus
> and newbies alike. When a newbie wanders into a discussion the acronym
> and jargon ratio is usually mo
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 09:55:33PM -0400, A R wrote:
> Jeff Lessem wrote:
>
> > In your message of: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 18:20:27 EDT, you write:
> > >According to [1], the mirrors will be afected, so to create them it is
> > >said the
> > >some "exclude" tweaking must be done. Does anyone have the i
Jeff Lessem wrote:
> In your message of: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 18:20:27 EDT, you write:
> >According to [1], the mirrors will be afected, so to create them it is said
> >the
> >some "exclude" tweaking must be done. Does anyone have the info -or the
> >script-
> >for what exactly is meant
> >Mirro
In your message of: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 18:20:27 EDT, you write:
>According to [1], the mirrors will be afected, so to create them it is said the
>some "exclude" tweaking must be done. Does anyone have the info -or the script-
>for what exactly is meant
>Mirroring Potato, getting ready for 2.2_r1
According to [1], the mirrors will be afected, so to create them it is said the
some "exclude" tweaking must be done. Does anyone have the info -or the script-
for what exactly is meant
Mirroring Potato, getting ready for 2.2_r1
Joey Hess wrote:
> -
J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 20:08:35 -0500, Randy Edwards wrote:
> > > I found this great link from LWN.
> > > But, then I went back to the debian home page, and coundn't find it...
> >
> > I think the Debian Weekly News is a great addition to our community too.
> > To address y
On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 20:08:35 -0500, Randy Edwards wrote:
> > I found this great link from LWN.
> > But, then I went back to the debian home page, and coundn't find it...
>
> I think the Debian Weekly News is a great addition to our community too.
> To address your concern, the DWN seems to be
> I found this great link from LWN.
> But, then I went back to the debian home page, and coundn't find it...
I think the Debian Weekly News is a great addition to our community too.
To address your concern, the DWN seems to be a separate entity from the
"official" Debian web site.
--
Regard
Shao Zhang wrote:
> I found this great link from LWN.
>
> But, then I went back to the debian home page, and coundn't find
> it...
>
> Am I missing something??
It's not linked to from the debian homepage yet, being only 3 weeks old. The
url to it is http://www.debian.org/~joeyh
35 matches
Mail list logo
