On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 16 Aug 2017 at 13:27:30 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> > FYI just noticed that the debian-user archives have not been updated
> since
> > 10 August.
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/08/thrd2.html
>
> gives me the mail you ha
On Wed 16 Aug 2017 at 13:27:30 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> FYI just noticed that the debian-user archives have not been updated since
> 10 August.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/08/thrd2.html
gives me the mail you have posted. You will have to be more specific.
How did you acces
On 20140120_105413, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 1/20/14, Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 18 Jan 2014 at 09:31:21 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> >
> >> If this garbage OT crap ('sad but true Linux sucks', and 'Hey Humans
>
> > It is not frequent but it does occur.
>
> > It happens; you live through it. You do
On 1/20/14, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 18 Jan 2014 at 09:31:21 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> If this garbage OT crap ('sad but true Linux sucks', and 'Hey Humans
> It is not frequent but it does occur.
> It happens; you live through it. You don't need a moderator as a crutch.
> Build your kill file i
On Sat 18 Jan 2014 at 09:31:21 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> If this garbage OT crap ('sad but true Linux sucks', and 'Hey Humans
> I'm a machine') is typical of this list, is there a debian related
> list that doesn't allow such crap to go on and on and on and on and
> on and on ad nauseum?
It is no
Tanstaafl writes:
> Which means you easily miss valuable information provided by the same
> people who consistently engage in ridiculous OT nonsense.
A decent MUA allows you to killfile (score down, actually) subjects,
threads, or keywords. It also lets you score up (or down) selected
authors. T
On 2014-01-19 9:17 AM, John Hasler wrote:
Tanstaafl writes:
Obviously it is the enforcement that is key.
Killfiles are the key. Use a modern MUA and you can easily arrange not
to see anything you wish to avoid.
Which means you easily miss valuable information provided by the same
people
Tanstaafl writes:
> Obviously it is the enforcement that is key.
Killfiles are the key. Use a modern MUA and you can easily arrange not
to see anything you wish to avoid.
> If the debian-users list had moderators that actually cared,
This list has no moderators. Period. Nor does it need any.
On 2014-01-18 8:53 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Imagine again if every one of those people could speak without any
limitation. Or rather the only limitation is each person's own
discipline. That is basically what we have here. A small number of
participants without discipline.
And therein lies the
Le 19/01/2014 06:43, Артур Истомин a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:31:21AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If this garbage OT crap ('sad but true Linux sucks', and 'Hey Humans
>> I'm a machine') is typical of this list, is there a debian related
>> list that doesn't allow such crap
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:31:21AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If this garbage OT crap ('sad but true Linux sucks', and 'Hey Humans
> I'm a machine') is typical of this list, is there a debian related
> list that doesn't allow such crap to go on and on and on and on and
> on and on ad na
Dear Sir,
I would like to protest in the strongest possible terms your
representation of officers of the British Army. It is simply shameful.
And also the traffic on this email list. Can't something be done
about it? Think about the children!
...oh...sorry...this isn't Monty Python, is it?
Tanstaafl wrote:
> If this garbage OT crap ('sad but true Linux sucks', and 'Hey Humans
> I'm a machine') is typical of this list,
It varies from season to season. Although often it feels like the
September That Never Ended. There are more than 2,000 plus
subscribers to debian-user. Imagine if
So, no one with experience on debian with this usb device? :-(
Javier.
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent this to another list, but apparently no one knows, or cares to
> answer...
>
> Bad thing I'm not using debian in the x86-64 and x86-32 machines I'm
> t
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 20:24:18 -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> I sent this to another list, but apparently no one knows, or cares to
> answer...
>
> Bad thing I'm not using debian in the x86-64 and x86-32 machines I'm
> trying. I do use debian on other mips mini-pcs though...
(...)
In case you di
Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 10:38:23PM -0700, Ted Hilts wrote:
I am looking for some advice regarding integration of tools for
development purposes. I have obtained the following over the internet.:
1. All debian binary and source DVD ISOs (for the present stable
vers
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 10:38:23PM -0700, Ted Hilts wrote:
> I am looking for some advice regarding integration of tools for
> development purposes. I have obtained the following over the internet.:
>
> 1. All debian binary and source DVD ISOs (for the present stable
> version) as the bas
Ted Hilts wrote:
I am looking for some advice regarding integration of tools for
development purposes. I have obtained the following over the internet.:
1. All debian binary and source DVD ISOs (for the present stable
version) as the basis of a repository for binary and source code. I
blasted th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ted Hilts - Thunderbird Acct. wrote:
> When dialing up my ISP in an interactive mode providing user name and
> password I get a third prompt with the prompt message "AiiNET". So now
> I get 3 prompts: "user name", "password", and "AiiNET" where before
Am 2007-11-16 23:04:06, schrieb Ted Hilts:
> BTW: Isn't it some form of discrimination to provide ISP services and
> support for Windoz and Mac while turning a blind eye to Linux???
Definitivly
> That's how my ISP behaves. I think that in Europe it is apparently law
> for computer manufa
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:40:34PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:08:11PM -0700, Ted Hilts - Thunderbird Acct. wrote:
> > When dialing up my ISP in an interactive mode providing user name and
> > password I get a third prompt with the prompt message "AiiNET". So now
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Saturday 17 November 2007, Ted Hilts wrote:
...
What I was trying to say is that I am not sure where the "AiiNET"
prompt is coming from. Is it coming from the ISP or is it being
manufactured by Minicom as some respone. I think the "AiiNET" prompt
is coming from the ISP
John Hasler wrote:
Thunderbird Acct. wrote:
When dialing up my ISP in an interactive mode providing user name and
password I get a third prompt with the prompt message "AiiNET".
Some ISPs respond with a username/password prompt when you use an
interactive program but expect PAP autheni
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Friday 16 November 2007, Ted Hilts - Thunderbird Acct. wrote:
This question is informational and there is no urgency.
I'm not going to cover what has the first response has said, but I have
a bit I can add:
When dialing up my ISP in an interactive mode prov
On Saturday 17 November 2007, Ted Hilts wrote:
...
> What I was trying to say is that I am not sure where the "AiiNET"
> prompt is coming from. Is it coming from the ISP or is it being
> manufactured by Minicom as some respone. I think the "AiiNET" prompt
> is coming from the ISP just as the "use
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:08:11PM -0700, Ted Hilts - Thunderbird Acct. wrote:
When dialing up my ISP in an interactive mode providing user name and
password I get a third prompt with the prompt message "AiiNET". So now
I get 3 prompts: "user name", "password", and "
Thunderbird Acct. wrote:
> When dialing up my ISP in an interactive mode providing user name and
> password I get a third prompt with the prompt message "AiiNET".
Some ISPs respond with a username/password prompt when you use an
interactive program but expect PAP authenication when they see a PPP
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 06:14:13PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Friday 16 November 2007, Ted Hilts - Thunderbird Acct. wrote:
> > ...Has anyone
> > else run into this situation where the "AiiNET" prompt occurs during
> > manual dial up? In the following paragraph I provide more detail.
>
> If
On Friday 16 November 2007, Ted Hilts - Thunderbird Acct. wrote:
> This question is informational and there is no urgency.
I'm not going to cover what has the first response has said, but I have
a bit I can add:
> When dialing up my ISP in an interactive mode providing user name and
> password I
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:08:11PM -0700, Ted Hilts - Thunderbird Acct. wrote:
> When dialing up my ISP in an interactive mode providing user name and
> password I get a third prompt with the prompt message "AiiNET". So now
> I get 3 prompts: "user name", "password", and "AiiNET" where before I
# rm -f 1141914051.*
No promises... but something like that worked once for me in a similar
mysterious situation.
Ah, hadn't tried that yet. Too bad it didn't work.
$ rm -i 1141914051.*
rm: cannot lstat
`1141914051.M484859P8695V0309Ip0007553_0.draupnir,S=3707:2,S':
No such file or
snip
for things I want to do at this session. I want to be selective because I
tend to only want to do certain updates after hours, just in case.
Yes, you should switch to aptitude.
Thank you. That was perfect. It is basically a drop in replacement for
how I was using 'apt-get' with th
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:19:39PM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> Russell Coker, 2003-Nov-20 04:14 +1100:
> > On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:00, Caoilte O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > doesn't fam engage in periodic disk access? i certainly get
> > > a lot less when not using kde despite having 256M RAM.
>
Thus spake Yves Rutschle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 03:19:46PM -0500, Ryan M. Golbeck wrote:
> > apt-get install ratpoison
>
> ratpoison looks interesting (I never actually tried it,
> because I ran into ION first and fell in love).
>
> The idea of only having one, full-scree
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Bdennou-t$B%f!<%6!wElBg>pJsM}9)(B $B$G$9!#(B
(B
(BIn article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:07:28 +0900), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B(ISHIOKA Keiichi) says:
(B
(B> $B$H$$$&$o$1$G(B, $B$b$7(B UTnet $BFb$G(B Debian $B$N8x<0(B mirror
(B> $B%5%$%H$r0z$-7Q$$(
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 07:41:42AM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
> Could you avoid posting to a mailing list by doing a reply to a current
> thread and changing the subject ? I don't know for pine but on MUA able
> to display the threads, it's boring to see a thread in another simply
> because you
You already got enough reply about sorting, so :
Could you avoid posting to a mailing list by doing a reply to a current
thread and changing the subject ? I don't know for pine but on MUA able
to display the threads, it's boring to see a thread in another simply
because you can type the ml address
> I subscribe to three lists that use this protocol and I can tell you
> that "intrusive" is not nearly a strong enough word. There is little
> enough space for the $subject without wasting it on null values.
Agreed totally.
No one mentioned the problem of handling the subject line for replies.
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:55:18 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Good wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Marc Wilson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Thomas Good wrote:
>> > Why have we no subject prefix on postings, ala "[Debian Users]"
>> > to use for sorting... ???
>>
>> Because it's (a) intrusi
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 01:04:58AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.06.24.2321 +0200]:
> >
> > Well, all I can say is, when I opened my email and saw a bunch of messages
> > with "[ Debian Users ]" in the Subject line, I thought, "Oh, no, what's
also sprach Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.06.24.2321 +0200]:
>
> Well, all I can say is, when I opened my email and saw a bunch of messages
> with "[ Debian Users ]" in the Subject line, I thought, "Oh, no, what's
> possessed them to do that?" There's little enough real estate in the
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Thomas Good wrote:
> But "Intrusive" ? - that may be slightly melodramatic.
Well, all I can say is, when I opened my email and saw a bunch of messages
with "[ Debian Users ]" in the Subject line, I thought, "Oh, no, what's
possessed them to do that?" There's little enough r
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:55:18PM -0400, Thomas Good wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Marc Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Thomas Good wrote:
> > > Why have we no subject prefix on postings, ala "[Debian Users]"
> > > to use for sorting... ???
> >
> > Because it's (a) i
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Thomas Good wrote:
> > Why have we no subject prefix on postings, ala "[Debian Users]"
> > to use for sorting... ???
>
> Because it's (a) intrusive, (b) annoying, and (c) not necessary. Here's a
I don't want to s
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:51:58AM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
| On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Thomas Good wrote:
| > Why have we no subject prefix on postings, ala "[Debian Users]"
| > to use for sorting... ???
|
| Because it's (a) intrusive, (b) annoying, and (c) not necessary. Here's
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Thomas Good wrote:
> Why have we no subject prefix on postings, ala "[Debian Users]"
> to use for sorting... ???
Because it's (a) intrusive, (b) annoying, and (c) not necessary. Here's a
procmail recipie that'll sort out all mail from Debian mailing lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Thomas Good wrote:
> Why have we no subject prefix on postings, ala "[Debian Users]"
> to use for sorting... ???
Sort using some other header. Here's a procmail recipe...
:0
* ^X-Mailing-List:[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Thomas Good wrote:
> Why have we no subject prefix on postings, ala "[Debian Users]"
> to use for sorting... ???
Filtering on the X-Mailing-List: header is far more reliable and far
less intrusive. There are example procmail recipes in the documentation
of
Why not sort on the address, thats what I do.
--
Arthur H. Johnson II, Debian GNU/Linux Advocate
Catechist, St John Catholic Church, Davison MI USA
President, Genesee County Linux Users Group
IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],#debian
YIM: arthurjohnson
AIM: bytor4232
ICQ: 31770438
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Thomas Good wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Why have we no subject prefix on postings, ala "[Debian Users]"
> to use for sorting... ???
>
> Thanks!
Setup your filters to filter on To or CC: to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:44:52AM -0700, Randall Hansen wrote:
> I'm still not getting any packets out, though. I have nameservers in
> /etc/resolv.conf. I have *no idea* where to configure a default gateway. Do
> I need to do a 'route add'? Some documentation I've seen makes reference to
> "/etc/
the driver by 3com isn´t good.
try the vortex driver, it works very fine here.
(but i´m useing kernel 2.4.*).
andreas
If that doesn't work, you could try 'alias eth0 3c59x'
-Original Message-
From: Michael Marziani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 12:40 PM
To: 'Randall Hansen'; 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: RE: [debian-users] 3Com 3c
Hi,
Regarding your NIC woes:
> I'm trying to get my 3Com 3c900B-TPO working under Debian 2.2.18pre21.
> Here's what I've tried, and what I know, or think I know :P
>
> - Debian installer didn't detect the card.
> - The card's not detected by Debian at boot (I found no 'eth0' in dmesg)
> - 'i
Randall Hansen wrote (on 19 Apr 2001, at 8:30):
> Hello folks ~
>
> I'm trying to get my 3Com 3c900B-TPO working under Debian 2.2.18pre21.
> Here's what I've tried, and what I know, or think I know :P
"The" site to read about the 3com cards is Donald Becker's
http://www.scyld.com/network/
I se
I'm not sure how linuxconf works on debian (I actually hadn't used it since
I switched from redhat). I'm still learning about the whole Debian
subculture, but I think the "Debian way" is to just edit the files directly.
As I've begun to do that more I feel like I understand the system a lot
better
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Randall Hansen wrote:
> I'm trying to get my 3Com 3c900B-TPO working under Debian 2.2.18pre21.
[snip]
I suppose that all that errors with 3Com 90x cards under Debian 2.2 are
because of version of the driver it uses. The source file 3c59x.c of
module 3c59x was last edited in 1
At 987687039s since epoch (04/19/01 11:30:39 -0400 UTC), Randall Hansen wrote:
> I'm trying to get my 3Com 3c900B-TPO working under Debian 2.2.18pre21.
> Here's what I've tried, and what I know, or think I know :P
I have had trouble getting Linux (of all flavors) to find my 3Com cards at
times.
On Fri, Jan 23, 1998 at 10:09:56AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm using slrn's scoring to bring Debian-related postings to my attention.
I've just re-written my score file for the Linux groups I subscribe to. I
can filter out most of the unwanted messages by killing those with
subjects con
On Thu, Jan 22, 1998 at 08:01:37PM +1030, John Spence wrote:
> I just replied to a message in comp.os.linux.setup that asked where all
> the Debian users were.
>
> Are we so few or are we so selective? The only reason I read the message
> at all is because I filter out every newsgroup message tha
60 matches
Mail list logo
