On Vi, 16 sep 11, 00:48:25, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>
> I wonder if there should be a separate mailing list to Cc: such
> bug reports. (debian-dependency-inquisitors@, perhaps?)
I don't think dependencies need any special handling compared to other
bug reports. In cases where you don't
> Andrei Popescu writes:
> On Lu, 11 iul 11, 14:51:48, William Hopkins wrote:
> Old thread, but still...
>> Absolutely! Easy to find examples with apt-cache rdepends dbus. I
>> would posit that nearly all packages that depend on DBUS should
>> actually depend on libdbus{,-c++,-java,-
Old thread, but still...
On Lu, 11 iul 11, 14:51:48, William Hopkins wrote:
>
> Absolutely! Easy to find examples with apt-cache rdepends dbus. I would posit
> that nearly all packages that depend on DBUS should actually depend on
> libdbus{,-c++,-java,-ruby}. Do these packages (such as rhythmbox
On Ma, 12 iul 11, 00:33:18, shawn wilson wrote:
> i'm not the op (obviously) however, would it be possible to override a
> package's dependancies using apt-file with specific prerequisites? ie,
> if i wanted to tell every package that required libc6 to go ahead and
> install ignoring libc6 (knowing
i'm not the op (obviously) however, would it be possible to override a
package's dependancies using apt-file with specific prerequisites? ie,
if i wanted to tell every package that required libc6 to go ahead and
install ignoring libc6 (knowing that i'd eventually break every new
package) could i?
On 12/07/11 04:57, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 07/11/11 at 11:52am, Camale�n wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:43:45 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
>>
>>> Listers, looking for a little community input:
>>>
>>> What is the best way to get answers on Debian policy questions? I have
>>> had some issues
On 07/11/11 at 11:52am, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:43:45 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
>
> > Listers, looking for a little community input:
> >
> > What is the best way to get answers on Debian policy questions? I have
> > had some issues I'd like to get a policy answer on or possib
On 07/11/11 at 07:19am, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-07-11 04:43 +0200, William Hopkins wrote:
>
> > If you're curious, the issue I've been having is regarding package
> > dependencies. Some packages seem to have extraneous dependencies outside of
> > what is strictly required (package build tool
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:43:45 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> Listers, looking for a little community input:
>
> What is the best way to get answers on Debian policy questions? I have
> had some issues I'd like to get a policy answer on or possibly provide
> input (aka, my $0.02) for.
>
> If you'
On 2011-07-11 04:43 +0200, William Hopkins wrote:
> If you're curious, the issue I've been having is regarding package
> dependencies. Some packages seem to have extraneous dependencies outside of
> what is strictly required (package build tools will tell you what is strictly
> required). Packages
On 07/10/11 at 10:53pm, shawn wilson wrote:
> how about 'apt-cache policy '
Er, I think this shows your current settings for version preference/pinning. I
was referring to policy in terms of the debian maintainer policy, uploader
policy, etc.
--
Liam
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
heh, sorry didn't read your full email :)
maybe you're looking for this:
cat /etc/apt/apt.conf
APT::Install-Recommends "0";
APT::Install-Suggests "0";
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 22:53, shawn wilson wrote:
> how about 'apt-cache policy '
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 22:43, William Hopkins wrote:
>>
how about 'apt-cache policy '
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 22:43, William Hopkins wrote:
> Listers, looking for a little community input:
>
> What is the best way to get answers on Debian policy questions? I have had
> some
> issues I'd like to get a policy answer on or possibly provide input (aka, m
13 matches
Mail list logo
