Re: Debian Package of the Day

On Oct 3, 6:20 am, Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's up (or should I say down?) withhttp://debaday.debian.net/?The > site won't come up and email is rejected. Looks like it's up now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: Debian Package of the Day

Hi, On Wed Oct 03, 2007 at 09:09:31 -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote: > What's up (or should I say down?) with http://debaday.debian.net/? The > site won't come up and email is rejected. The machine running that host is currently down, i already pinged local admins to reboot the machine. The last thing

Re: Debian package of the day

On Wednesday 28 June 2006 09:30 am, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > you could probably, IMHO, ignore just about any i18n package. > Likewise you could probably ignore any lib* package as well. Or even Yeah, I'm going to set it to ignore all i18n packages, as well as all -dbg, -dev, -doc, etc. I'm

Re: Debian package of the day

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:52:51AM -0700, Aaron Maxwell wrote: > On Tuesday 27 June 2006 04:17 pm, Lance Simmons wrote: > > * Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060623 16:49]: > > > Looks cool...how about an RSS feed? :) I could stand to learn > > I second the request for an RSS feed. That's p

Re: Debian package of the day

On Tuesday 27 June 2006 04:17 pm, Lance Simmons wrote: > * Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060623 16:49]: > > Looks cool...how about an RSS feed? :) I could stand to learn > I second the request for an RSS feed. That's pretty much the only > way I ever read websites any more. A feed is def

Re: Debian package of the day

* Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060623 16:49]: > Looks cool...how about an RSS feed? :) I could stand to learn about 24 new > Debian packages a day. That should get me through all of them in, oh, 750 to > 1000 years. :) I second the request for an RSS feed. That's pretty much the only

Re: Debian package of the day

On Monday 26 June 2006 02:25 am, Jon Dowland wrote: > Nice: There have been a few attempts at this in the past > which have died off, is > one of them. seems to still be > going. I didn't know about those, thanks. Actually, is http:

Re: Debian package of the day

At 1151072556 past the epoch, Aaron Maxwell wrote: > Something I did for fun, that you might find neat: > http://potd.redsymbol.net > > It's pretty skeletal right now; I'll add features to it > over time. (If anyone has a feature request, post on this > list or email me.) Nice: There have been a

Re: Debian package of the day

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 10:22:49PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Aaron Maxwell wrote: > >I read a > >post once in which someone bemoaned the passing of dselect, because it > >highlighted newly-minted packages. With apt*, he rarely knew of that > >new software, unless he just stumbled across i

Re: Debian package of the day

Steve Kemp wrote: On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:13:24PM -0700, Aaron Maxwell wrote: I read a post once in which someone bemoaned the passing of dselect, because it highlighted newly-minted packages. With apt*, he rarely knew of that new software, unless he just stumbled across it. I thought th

Re: Debian package of the day

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:13:24PM -0700, Aaron Maxwell wrote: > I read a post once in which someone bemoaned the passing of dselect, > because it highlighted newly-minted packages. With apt*, he rarely knew > of that new software, unless he just stumbled across it. I thought that > was a pre

Re: Debian package of the day

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:13:24PM -0700, Aaron Maxwell wrote: > On Friday 23 June 2006 04:44 pm, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:37:33PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > > > One question, though. Wouldn't "updated hourly!" imply that this > > > is really the Debian pack

Re: Debian package of the day

Aaron Maxwell wrote: Don't complain, or I'll make it update every ten minutes! Then we'll all be in trouble. :-) If anyone's curious, the reason I did this is that there's so much software for debian - about 17,000 packages in i386/main - that there are probably some you would find interes

Re: Debian package of the day

On Friday 23 June 2006 04:44 pm, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:37:33PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > > One question, though. Wouldn't "updated hourly!" imply that this > > is really the Debian package of the hour? No, it's still the package of the day... and an hour

Re: Debian package of the day

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:37:33PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Aaron Maxwell wrote: > >Something I did for fun, that you might find neat: > >http://potd.redsymbol.net > > > >It's pretty skeletal right now; I'll add features to it over time. (If > >anyone has a feature request, post on this li

Re: Debian package of the day

Aaron Maxwell wrote: Something I did for fun, that you might find neat: http://potd.redsymbol.net It's pretty skeletal right now; I'll add features to it over time. (If anyone has a feature request, post on this list or email me.) Hi, Seems pretty cool. One question, though. Wouldn't "u

Re: Debian package of the day

Looks cool...how about an RSS feed? :) I could stand to learn about 24 new Debian packages a day. That should get me through all of them in, oh, 750 to 1000 years. :) j On Friday 23 June 2006 13:22, Aaron Maxwell wrote: > Something I did for fun, that you might find neat: > http://potd.redsym