Re: Debian Package Web Page seems not include non-free-firmware section

On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 19:18:30 +0100 Computer Enthusiastic wrote: > The web page used to search packages in Debian repositories at: > > https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages > > seems not to search for packages in the recently created > "non-free-firmware" section for bookwork and sid.

Re: Debian package missing

Hi Damon, On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 03:55:16PM +, Damon Bakker wrote: > http://security-cdn.debian.org/dists/jessie/updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages > > is now missing. It is used in the pipelines of bitbucket and now it seems > they're broken. Can it not use the .gz or .bz2 versions? http

Re: debian package for mu/mu4e 1.0

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:59:17PM +0100, juh wrote: > Hi all, > > is there a debian package for mu/mu4e 1.0 anywhere? > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=mu4e -- Roberto C. Sánchez

Re: Debian package: Quilt | git | add files to package

On 05/09/2016 02:55 PM, Denny Fuchs wrote: > hi, > > I trying to create a own Debian package which mostly worked without Git. > Now I moved the sources (only files) to a Git repo and using > git-buildpackage. That was working too, until I wanted to add a file > (example Apache config). Now it fail

Re: Debian package on Windows

Nate Bargmann writes: > Your question is a non sequitur. The GPL does not require derivatives > of a work to benefit the original author in any way. It only requires > that the terms it spells out be honored by anyone exercising the > rights to the covered work granted by it [GPL]. True, but so

Re: Debian package on Windows

* On 2016 22 Feb 10:42 -0600, Jean-Baptiste Thomas wrote: > De: "Ric Moore" > > and the GPL notice is included. I saw no mention to avoid the GPL in his > > request for information. Ergo, as long as the GPL is honored, this plan > > is actually a plus for Debian. > > How is Debian better off fr

Re: Debian package on Windows

On 02/22/2016 11:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Thomas wrote: De: "Ric Moore" and the GPL notice is included. I saw no mention to avoid the GPL in his request for information. Ergo, as long as the GPL is honored, this plan is actually a plus for Debian. How is Debian better off from Microsoft porting a

Re: Debian package on Windows

De: "Ric Moore" > and the GPL notice is included. I saw no mention to avoid the GPL in his > request for information. Ergo, as long as the GPL is honored, this plan > is actually a plus for Debian. How is Debian better off from Microsoft porting apt to Windows ?

Re: Debian package on Windows

On 02/20/2016 09:21 PM, Thiago wrote: Hello, Why did you send this message on Debian Apache and not in the main mailing list? I'm sorry, but you're not able to own GNU GPL to suck in your Application Manager. Either you will be educated mentioning it and respecting his copyright. First, thanks

Re: Debian package on Windows

Em 22-02-2016 10:56, Jonathan Dowland escreveu: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:21:46PM -0300, Thiago wrote: > Since this is a development query, debian-devel would be more appropriate than > debian-user, and unless I'm mistaken, you should make it clear that you do not > speak for Debian as you are n

Re: Debian package on Windows

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:21:46PM -0300, Thiago wrote: > Why did you send this message on Debian Apache and not in the main > mailing list? Since this is a development query, debian-devel would be more appropriate than debian-user, and unless I'm mistaken, you should make it clear that you do not

Re: Debian package on Windows

Em 21-02-2016 23:49, John Hasler escreveu: > I don't know what you mean by that. It's Free Software. They can do > with it what the license terms permit and no more absent special > permission from the copyright owner. The authors released it under the > GPL and that's that. Debian, not owning

Re: Debian package on Windows

Thiego writes: > I don't like the idea of Debian allowing the restrictions. I don't know what you mean by that. It's Free Software. They can do with it what the license terms permit and no more absent special permission from the copyright owner. The authors released it under the GPL and that's

Re: Debian package on Windows

So strongly to: new DRMs are NOT needed. Free Software is a permissive license, the GPL is not the problem. Who is accustomed managing the restrictions on computers & softwares that's really bad. I don't like the idea of Debian allowing the restrictions. Free Software is about ethics to the copyri

Re: Debian package on Windows

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 04:37:27PM -0500, Gary Dale wrote: > I don't see why you object so strongly to the idea of porting apt-get to > Windows. The idea may be a little crazy in that Windows programs don't > install the same way or use the same libraries but there are lots of other > programs that

Re: Debian package on Windows

I don't see why you object so strongly to the idea of porting apt-get to Windows. The idea may be a little crazy in that Windows programs don't install the same way or use the same libraries but there are lots of other programs that run on Linux and Windows without provoking a hostile response.

Re: Debian package on Windows

Hello, Why did you send this message on Debian Apache and not in the main mailing list? I'm sorry, but you're not able to own GNU GPL to suck in your Application Manager. Either you will be educated mentioning it and respecting his copyright. I don't know why do you do it. Maybe you thought in ne

Re: debian package policy?

Hans wrote: > some time ago, I asked, why some packages are in stable, NOT in > testing, but in unstable. > > At this post, I promised, to ask again, when i find such a package. > > Now I found one: snort. You can find snort in stable, NOT in testing, > but in unstable. Weired. And I am miss

Re: debian package policy?

On 01/29/2015 09:26 PM, Hans wrote: > H, it looks like I missed a lot! Maybe I should subscribe to a list, > where > I get such informations. What do you think is a good list, if I want to get > informed, when packages are removed from the repo? > > Is debian-rele...@lists.debian.org the ri

Re: debian package policy?

> In addition to Ross's message, see this, which should make > things clear: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2014/11/msg00406.html > > (Snort depends on daq). > > /regards > -- Andreas Rönnquist > mailingli...@gusnan.se > gus...@gusnan.se H, it looks like I missed a lot! Maybe I s

Re: debian package policy?

On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:34:45 +0100, Hans wrote: >Dear maintainers, > >some time ago, I asked, why some packages are in stable, NOT in >testing, but in unstable. > >At this post, I promised, to ask again, when i find such a package. > >Now I found one: snort. You can find snort in stable, NOT in te

Re: debian package policy?

> Hi Hans, > > Generally, new & updated packages are uploaded to unstable, and then > automatically transition to testing once certain conditions are met. > > Testing is where each release is taken from. At certain points in the > release cycle, packages are automatically removed from testing wh

Re: debian package policy?

On Thu 29 Jan 2015 at 20:34:45 +0100, Hans wrote: > Dear maintainers, > > some time ago, I asked, why some packages are in stable, NOT in testing, but > in unstable. > > At this post, I promised, to ask again, when i find such a package. > > Now I found one: snort. You can find snort in stable

Re: debian package policy?

On 01/29/2015 08:34 PM, Hans wrote: > Dear maintainers, > > some time ago, I asked, why some packages are in stable, NOT in testing, but > in unstable. > > At this post, I promised, to ask again, when i find such a package. > > Now I found one: snort. You can find snort in stable, NOT in testin

Re: Debian package skeleton

On Sb, 19 apr 14, 13:14:09, Andy wrote: > Hello all, > > Is there one or more 'skeletons' folder hierarchies, to create Debian > packages? If yes, where can I download them? > > I am thinking something like a folder structure, with some configuration > files and a Makefile, where I can just extra

Re: Debian package skeleton

Hi! Maybe you want to look at the packages packaging-tutorial and hello. You can also download any package and look at the packaging with apt-get source . It seems that dh-make can be what you seek also, it does not configure everything for you though. You will need to configure and tune the pack

Re: Debian package skeleton

What you ask for can't really be done. Upstream practices are too unpredictable. Install debhelper, read the maintainer's guide and the Debian policy manual, find an existing package that is similar to the one you want to create, and modify the files from it. For most packages debhelper and the

Re: Debian package component belonging

Hello List, On 05/05/13 07:07, Bob Proulx wrote: > Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Bob Proulx wrote: >>> Jerome BENOIT wrote: Is there an easy way to get it from the .debian.tar.(gz|bz2|xz) ? >>> >>> $ tar xf emacs23-non-dfsg_23.4+1-1.debian.tar.gz --to-stdout >>> debian/control | sed -n '/^Sectio

Re: Debian package component belonging

Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > > Is there an easy way to get it from the .debian.tar.(gz|bz2|xz) ? > > > > $ tar xf emacs23-non-dfsg_23.4+1-1.debian.tar.gz --to-stdout > > debian/control | sed -n '/^Section:/{s/.* //;s@/.*@@p;q}' > > non-free > > You are

Re: Debian package component belonging

Hi Bob, On 04/05/13 05:04, Bob Proulx wrote: > Hi Jerome, > > Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> I was looking for a ready to use tool to extract the components: >> I guess I have to write my own stuff to do so. > > How about: > > $ tar --to-stdout -xf emacs23-non-dfsg_23.4+1-1.debian.tar.gz > debian/c

Re: Debian package component belonging

On Sat, 04 May 2013 01:41:45 +0200 Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello List, > > given a package name, how can we know to which Debian component (man, > contrib, non-free) it belongs ? > > Thanks in advance, > Jerome > > aptitude -F 'Package: %p - Section: %s' search '^package_name$' -- EMACS i

Re: Debian package component belonging

Hi Jerome, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > I was looking for a ready to use tool to extract the components: > I guess I have to write my own stuff to do so. How about: $ tar --to-stdout -xf emacs23-non-dfsg_23.4+1-1.debian.tar.gz debian/control | grep ^Section: Section: non-free/editors Section: n

Re: Debian package component belonging

Hi Again, On 04/05/13 03:18, Bob Proulx wrote: > Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Is there an easy way to get it from the .debian.tar.(gz|bz2|xz) ? > > Look at the debian/control file. I got this part. I was looking for a ready to use tool to extract the components: I guess I have to write my own stuff t

Re: Debian package component belonging

Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Is there an easy way to get it from the .debian.tar.(gz|bz2|xz) ? Look at the debian/control file. Look for the Section: field. What does it say? The "main/" is implied and so not included. But any section that is other than main will be stated there. If it doesn't say

Re: Debian package component belonging

Hi Bob ! On 04/05/13 01:49, Bob Proulx wrote: > Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> given a package name, how can we know to which Debian component >> (man, contrib, non-free) it belongs ? > > 1. Use apt-cache to show the package header and look to see what >section it it in. > > $ apt-cache show emac

Re: Debian package component belonging

Jerome BENOIT wrote: > given a package name, how can we know to which Debian component > (man, contrib, non-free) it belongs ? 1. Use apt-cache to show the package header and look to see what section it it in. $ apt-cache show emacs23-common-non-dfsg | grep Section Section: non-free/editor

Re: Debian Package Version system

Hello all, On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 09:54:22AM +0100, Arnoud Tijssen wrote: > After performing some vulnerability scans on some our systems one of > the outcomes was that some software packages were out of date. > We`re using the package management system of Debian and all packages > were updated (

RE: Debian Package Version system

Thanks for the info, this solves the issue. I probably have been looking in the wrong direction. -Original Message- From: Darac Marjal [mailto:mailingl...@darac.org.uk] Sent: donderdag 22 november 2012 15:51 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Debian Package Version system On

Re: Debian Package Version system

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 09:54:22AM +0100, Arnoud Tijssen wrote: > Hi All, > > After performing some vulnerability scans on some our systems one of the > outcomes was that some software packages were out of date. > We`re using the package management system of Debian and all packages were > update

Re: Debian package building for single files or virtual packages?

On 07/18/2011 03:36 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: I'm facing some locally used tools that consist of only single files, such as "mkrdns". I'd love to wrap it up in a .deb, but the dh-make and related tools seem oriented around software that comes in tarballs and has Makefile or autoconf or Makefil

Re: debian package for xxxterm ? (squeeze)

On Mon, 16 May 2011 13:56:19 -0500, Charles Blair wrote: > I did some unsuccessful searching. > >The site for this browser claims to have a download for > linux. Is it safe to try that? If you can see the code and you are able to understand it, yep, it's safe :-) For the rest of us -mere

Re: debian package for xxxterm ? (squeeze)

I've never use xxxterm, but I think u may just install it under ur own home dir and have a try, that's look not too complex. 2011/5/17 Charles Blair : >   I did some unsuccessful searching. > >   The site for this browser claims to have a download for > linux.  Is it safe to try that? > > > -- > T

Re: Debian package for repository

2009/9/23 Javier Barroso : > Hi Dale, > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Dale wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I am new to Debian packaging, but I have created a Debian package that >> I would not mind being included in the repository. >> >> My question is how do I go about doing this? > If you want you

Re: Debian package for repository

Hi Dale, On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Dale wrote: > Hi All, > > I am new to Debian packaging, but I have created a Debian package that > I would not mind being included in the repository. > > My question is how do I go about doing this? If you want your package go to debian, you need go to m

Re: debian package creation: how to specify a version range in Depends: field

Please don't cc me; I am subscribed. Unfortunately I don't have the time to do tests here, but I am sure you are quite close to your answer. Good luck, Tiago. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d

Re: debian package creation: how to specify a version range in Depends: field

Hi, FYI , I have a 10.0 and a 11.5 version of B in my repository. I added a Conflicts line with B (>= 11.0), the error: The following packages have unmet dependencies: A: Depends: B (>= 10.0) but it is not going to be installed I tried the Depends: B (>= 10.0), B (<< 11.0), the error: The fo

Re: debian package creation: how to specify a version range in Depends: field

On 2009-07-31 16:34 +0200, Peter Van Biesen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm building a package that depends on another package but this package needs > to be a in a specific version range. > > My package "A" depends on package "B" but the version of B needs to be 10.* . > > I tried > Depends: B(>>10.0), B(

Re: debian package creation: how to specify a version range in Depends: field

What about Depends: B(>=10.0) Conflicts: B(>=11.0) ? Cheers, Tiago. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Debian package configure options - repost

Kumar Appaiah wrote: You could use the new Debian patch tracking service and view the debian/rules part of the changes: http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/debianonly/view/squid3/3.0.STABLE8-3 There, I see: --enable-auth="basic,digest,ntlm" --enable-basic-auth-helpers="LDAP,MSNT,NCSA,PAM,SA

Re: Debian package configure options - repost

On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:17 PM, TR wrote: > I want to use the Debian squid3 package but need to know what configure > options were used. > > I require the following:- > > ./configure --enable-auth=”basic” -enable-basic-auth-helpers="LDAP" -- > enable-ssl --enable-auth-on-accel > > If the package ha

Re: Debian package installation

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 11:09:24PM +1100, David Schulberg wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have a Debian package which starts a service set up by having > ‘dh_installinit’ in my rules file. > > I want the service to start every time my computer boots up. > > Does it have to fire up also straight after

Re: Debian package of Qtopia

Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 06:50:32AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hi, Qtopia ("application framework for single-purpose devices powered by embedded Linux") used to be called "qt-embedded" but now I can't find it as a package. Anyone? Is this it? Sure did n

Re: Debian package of Qtopia

On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 06:50:32AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Hi, > > Qtopia ("application framework for single-purpose devices powered by > embedded Linux") used to be called "qt-embedded" but now I can't find it as > a package. > > Anyone? Is this it? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache searc

Re: Debian package of Qtopia

Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hi, Qtopia ("application framework for single-purpose devices powered by embedded Linux") used to be called "qt-embedded" but now I can't find it as a package. Anyone? It really does not exist? All I found is a note to convert the rpm: http://www.qtopia.net/modules/

Re: debian package for sleep to disk?

Michael Biebl schrieb: > > In case you have problems to successfully resume, please follow the > instructions at > http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/quirk/quirk-suspend-index.html > and send the resulting fdi-file/patch to the hal mailing list or open a > bug report against hal-info. > I

Re: debian package for sleep to disk?

Bruno Boettcher schrieb: > hello > > i am in the process of setting up a new laptop, and am at the moment > searching without a success how to implement a hibernate > functionality > > there's surely a package in debian offering this, but i seem to hit the > wrong keywords so if someone c

Re: debian package for sleep to disk?

On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 04:36:52PM +0100, Bruno Boettcher wrote: From: Bruno Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian user list Subject: debian package for sleep to disk? Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian user list X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.835 ta

Re: debian package for sleep to disk?

On Nov 22, 2007 11:36 PM, Bruno Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello > > i am in the process of setting up a new laptop, and am at the moment > searching without a success how to implement a hibernate > functionality > > there's surely a package in debian offering this, but i seem to hi

Re: Debian Package of the Day

On Oct 3, 6:20 am, Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's up (or should I say down?) withhttp://debaday.debian.net/?The > site won't come up and email is rejected. Looks like it's up now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: Debian Package of the Day

Hi, On Wed Oct 03, 2007 at 09:09:31 -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote: > What's up (or should I say down?) with http://debaday.debian.net/? The > site won't come up and email is rejected. The machine running that host is currently down, i already pinged local admins to reboot the machine. The last thing

Re: Debian package for Emacs XFT

On 5 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I can find packages of Emacs with XFT for Ubuntu everywhere, but > none for Debian Etch. Did anybody packaged Emacs+XFT for Debian > Etch? where can I get those packages? Thanks. twb has a script to build the debs [1]. I have some debs for i386 and amd6

Re: debian, package and other version info

On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:01:44PM -0800, Petra Kabayo wrote: > Thanks a lot Roberto. > > Now, does "4" in 4Sarge5 correspond to the Debian stable release number? > When you download the Debian installers, you see the versions: > > 3.1_r0 > 3.1_r1 > . > . > 3.1_r5 > > So

Re: debian, package and other version info

Thanks a lot Roberto. Now, does "4" in 4Sarge5 correspond to the Debian stable release number? When you download the Debian installers, you see the versions: 3.1_r0 3.1_r1 . . 3.1_r5 So this means Debian 3.1_r5 already includes mysql-server-4.1/4.1.11a-5? And then any ne

Re: debian, package and other version info

On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 17:14 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:22:45PM -0800, Petra Kabayo wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to discern the versioning info being used. Take this > mysql bug report: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369735 > >

Re: debian, package and other version info

On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:22:45PM -0800, Petra Kabayo wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to discern the versioning info being used. Take this mysql bug > report: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369735 > > Says fixed in version mysql-server-4.1/4.1.11a-4sarge4. I figure

Re: Debian package of the day

On Wednesday 28 June 2006 09:30 am, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > you could probably, IMHO, ignore just about any i18n package. > Likewise you could probably ignore any lib* package as well. Or even Yeah, I'm going to set it to ignore all i18n packages, as well as all -dbg, -dev, -doc, etc. I'm

Re: Debian package of the day

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:52:51AM -0700, Aaron Maxwell wrote: > On Tuesday 27 June 2006 04:17 pm, Lance Simmons wrote: > > * Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060623 16:49]: > > > Looks cool...how about an RSS feed? :) I could stand to learn > > I second the request for an RSS feed. That's p

Re: Debian package of the day

On Tuesday 27 June 2006 04:17 pm, Lance Simmons wrote: > * Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060623 16:49]: > > Looks cool...how about an RSS feed? :) I could stand to learn > I second the request for an RSS feed. That's pretty much the only > way I ever read websites any more. A feed is def

Re: Debian package of the day

* Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060623 16:49]: > Looks cool...how about an RSS feed? :) I could stand to learn about 24 new > Debian packages a day. That should get me through all of them in, oh, 750 to > 1000 years. :) I second the request for an RSS feed. That's pretty much the only

Re: Debian package of the day

On Monday 26 June 2006 02:25 am, Jon Dowland wrote: > Nice: There have been a few attempts at this in the past > which have died off, is > one of them. seems to still be > going. I didn't know about those, thanks. Actually, is http:

Re: Debian package of the day

At 1151072556 past the epoch, Aaron Maxwell wrote: > Something I did for fun, that you might find neat: > http://potd.redsymbol.net > > It's pretty skeletal right now; I'll add features to it > over time. (If anyone has a feature request, post on this > list or email me.) Nice: There have been a

Re: Debian package of the day

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 10:22:49PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Aaron Maxwell wrote: > >I read a > >post once in which someone bemoaned the passing of dselect, because it > >highlighted newly-minted packages. With apt*, he rarely knew of that > >new software, unless he just stumbled across i

Re: Debian package of the day

Steve Kemp wrote: On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:13:24PM -0700, Aaron Maxwell wrote: I read a post once in which someone bemoaned the passing of dselect, because it highlighted newly-minted packages. With apt*, he rarely knew of that new software, unless he just stumbled across it. I thought th

Re: Debian package of the day

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:13:24PM -0700, Aaron Maxwell wrote: > I read a post once in which someone bemoaned the passing of dselect, > because it highlighted newly-minted packages. With apt*, he rarely knew > of that new software, unless he just stumbled across it. I thought that > was a pre

Re: Debian package of the day

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:13:24PM -0700, Aaron Maxwell wrote: > On Friday 23 June 2006 04:44 pm, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:37:33PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > > > One question, though. Wouldn't "updated hourly!" imply that this > > > is really the Debian pack

Re: Debian package of the day

Aaron Maxwell wrote: Don't complain, or I'll make it update every ten minutes! Then we'll all be in trouble. :-) If anyone's curious, the reason I did this is that there's so much software for debian - about 17,000 packages in i386/main - that there are probably some you would find interes

Re: Debian package of the day

On Friday 23 June 2006 04:44 pm, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:37:33PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > > One question, though. Wouldn't "updated hourly!" imply that this > > is really the Debian package of the hour? No, it's still the package of the day... and an hour

Re: Debian package of the day

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:37:33PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Aaron Maxwell wrote: > >Something I did for fun, that you might find neat: > >http://potd.redsymbol.net > > > >It's pretty skeletal right now; I'll add features to it over time. (If > >anyone has a feature request, post on this li

Re: Debian package of the day

Aaron Maxwell wrote: Something I did for fun, that you might find neat: http://potd.redsymbol.net It's pretty skeletal right now; I'll add features to it over time. (If anyone has a feature request, post on this list or email me.) Hi, Seems pretty cool. One question, though. Wouldn't "u

Re: Debian package of the day

Looks cool...how about an RSS feed? :) I could stand to learn about 24 new Debian packages a day. That should get me through all of them in, oh, 750 to 1000 years. :) j On Friday 23 June 2006 13:22, Aaron Maxwell wrote: > Something I did for fun, that you might find neat: > http://potd.redsym

Re: debian package installation

On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 17:25 +0100, B.Hoffmann wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:41 +0530, Rajasekaran J. wrote: > > hi > > > > I want to install debian package by double clicking mouse or keyboard > > like rpm package .do the needful. > > > > Rajasekaran > > > > > > I've only seen this in th

Re: debian package installation

On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:41 +0530, Rajasekaran J. wrote: > hi > > I want to install debian package by double clicking mouse or keyboard > like rpm package .do the needful. > > Rajasekaran > > I've only seen this in the customized version of KDE in Vectorlinux SoHo 5.01 which I've been using

Re: debian package installation

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:41:03 +0530 (IST) "Rajasekaran J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi > > I want to install debian package by double clicking mouse or keyboard > like rpm package .do the needful. well, why you'd want to do that is beyond me, but, most wm let you define the appropriate a

Re: debian package installation

* Martin Michlmayr [Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:04:49 +0200]: > * Rajasekaran J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-29 10:43]: > > i am not looking for Graphical packet manager. when we double click > > rpm package > > it is installing same as i need for debian package. > I don't use GNOME or KDE myself, but

Re: debian package installation

* Rajasekaran J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-29 10:43]: > i am not looking for Graphical packet manager. when we double click > rpm package > > it is installing same as i need for debian package. I don't use GNOME or KDE myself, but I'm pretty sure they offer something like that. However, you'

Re: Debian package containing header files?

Ishwar Rattan wrote: > Which package (from ftp.debian.org) might contain > the /usr/C11R6/include/X11/*.h header files? On my system. dpkg -S /usr/X11R6/include/X11/*.h | awk -F: '{print$1}' | sort -u libx11-dev libxpm-dev libxt-dev x-dev xlibs-static-dev > It is needed to compile so

Re: Debian package containing header files?

On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 14:04 -0400, Ishwar Rattan wrote: > Which package (from ftp.debian.org) might contain > the /usr/C11R6/include/X11/*.h header files? http://packages.debian.org -matt zagrabelny -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Re: Debian package containing header files?

On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 02:04:35PM -0400, Ishwar Rattan wrote: > Which package (from ftp.debian.org) might contain > the /usr/C11R6/include/X11/*.h header files? > > It is needed to compile some code that needs those > header files.. Presumably you meant 'X11R6' rather than 'C11R6' ... Try apt-

Re: Debian package containing header files?

Ishwar Rattan wrote: Which package (from ftp.debian.org) might contain the /usr/C11R6/include/X11/*.h header files? It is needed to compile some code that needs those header files.. -ishwar To find out which package provides a file called stdio.h you can use wajig whichpkg stdio.h So, yo

Re: debian package to cut subtitles?

El 18/07/2005, a las 21:31, Vegard|drageV escribió: I need to cut some subtitles (they belong to a movie wich is too large for a CD-R). If you have a movie (MPEG4 or so) with *encoded* subtitles, there are no means of "removing" them, they are part of the image. If you rip a DVD, then you

Re: debian package to cut subtitles?

En/La Vegard|drageV ha escrit, a 18/07/05 21:31: > I need to cut some subtitles (they belong to a movie wich is too large > for a CD-R). I have cut the movie with avidemux. On aviudemux' pages > there are mentioned some programs wich can cut subtitles: > > GtkSubtitler, GsubEdit and KsubEditor You

Re: debian package list

Le mercredi 15 juin 2005 à 08:01 +0200, Mart Frauenlob a écrit : > Hello Simon, > > Simon wrote: > > > Is there an easy place to get a list of installed packages... To make > > sure that i dont miss any in the new install? > > dpkg --get-selections > > should bring up all you need. ... to be

Re: debian package list

Hello Simon, Simon wrote: Is there an easy place to get a list of installed packages... To make sure that i dont miss any in the new install? dpkg --get-selections should bring up all you need. Mart -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Re: debian package list (dont worry - got it)

Simon wrote: Hi There, Im installing a new server to replace one of our old ones. Its a LAMP(PHP) server, so i am installing a nice fresh version of sarge. The old server was running sarge as well... Is there an easy place to get a list of installed packages... To make sure that i dont mis

Re: Debian package containing perl Date/Parse.pm

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 19:18:02 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) wrote: > William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote: > > > Does anyone know in which Debian package the perl module > > > Date::Parse is hidden? > > > > apt-get instal

Re: Debian package containing perl Date/Parse.pm

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 07:18:02PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote: > Sorry I don't use apt and "dpkg -S Parse.pm", which probably is the same > as "apt-file search Parse.pm" doesn't find anything. dpkg -S only searches already installed packages. apt-file does the same thing but includes not-installed pac

Re: Debian package containing perl Date/Parse.pm

Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone know in which Debian package the perl module Date::Parse > > is hidden? > > According to packages.debian.org, it's in the package libtimedate-perl. > Thanks a lot. It didn't occurred to me to look at packages.debian.org, I only tried "dpkg -S Pa

Re: Debian package containing perl Date/Parse.pm

William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote: > > Does anyone know in which Debian package the perl module Date::Parse is > > hidden? > > apt-get install apt-file > apt-file update > apt-file search Parse.pm Sorry I don't use apt and "dpk

Re: Debian package containing perl Date/Parse.pm

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:18:34 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) wrote: > Does anyone know in which Debian package the perl module Date::Parse > is hidden? According to packages.debian.org, it's in the package libtimedate-perl. HTH, Jacob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Debian package containing perl Date/Parse.pm

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote: > Does anyone know in which Debian package the perl module Date::Parse is > hidden? apt-get install apt-file apt-file update apt-file search Parse.pm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

  1   2   3   >