On Sat, May 28, 2022, 11:08 AM Cindy Sue Causey
wrote:
> On 5/28/22, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Brian wrote:
> >> > Careful! If you go on like this you will end up installing bullseye
> :).
> >
> > Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> >> Bookworm?
> >> SID?
> >
> > In any case: Not Testing !
> >
On 5/28/22, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brian wrote:
>> > Careful! If you go on like this you will end up installing bullseye :).
>
> Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>> Bookworm?
>> SID?
>
> In any case: Not Testing !
>
> Currently a zillion of packages get marked for autoremovial from Testing
> becau
Hi,
Brian wrote:
> > Careful! If you go on like this you will end up installing bullseye :).
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> Bookworm?
> SID?
In any case: Not Testing !
Currently a zillion of packages get marked for autoremovial from Testing
because of
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
On 24/5/22 23:23, Brian wrote:
Hi,
After my surrender to Jessie I've thought of moving on with Stretch.
Careful! If you go on like this you will end up installing bullseye :).
Bookworm?
SID?
--
All the best
Keith Bainbridge
keithrbaugro...@gmail.com
Hellow Махно ,
Махно writes:
> Hello. Just use i3. It is a tiling window manager designed for X11,
> inspired by wmii and written in C.[5] It supports tiling, stacking,
> and tabbing layouts, which it handles dynamically. Configuration is
> achieved via plain text file and extending i3 is possib
Hello. Just use i3. It is a tiling window manager designed for X11,
inspired by wmii and written in C.[5] It supports tiling, stacking,
and tabbing layouts, which it handles dynamically. Configuration is
achieved via plain text file and extending i3 is possible using its
Unix domain socket and JSON
Hellow didier,
didier gaumet writes:
> (... thanks ...)
> In fact you did not install Debian on your Chromebook but you enabled
> Debian inside Chrome OS on your Chromebook(1), right? In this case
> Debian runs in a Chrome OS container not on the hardware? Your
> screenshot seems to show a Chro
Le mercredi 25 mai 2022 à 08:50:05 UTC+2, 황병희 a écrit :
> Antonino Saetta writes:
>
> > (... thanks ...)
> > I thought that Debian is GNOME by default...
> >
> > Also, what's the lightest desktop? Default, XFCE or LXDE...?
> Hellow, i am beginner with Debian. I install Debian 11 Bullseye on
>
Antonino Saetta writes:
> (... thanks ...)
> I thought that Debian is GNOME by default...
>
> Also, what's the lightest desktop? Default, XFCE or LXDE...?
Hellow, i am beginner with Debian. I install Debian 11 Bullseye on
Chromebook. But there is no Gnome desktop. I just launch each Linux app
su
On Tue, 24 May 2022 13:27:29 +0200
Antonino Saetta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After my surrender to Jessie I've thought of moving on with Stretch.
>
> Currently I've installed it through the net, no problems at all.
>
> So I was wondering, why am I asked to choose (or not) a GNOME desktop
> environment,
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 02:23:46PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> apt install task-xfce-desktop
> apt unstall take-gnome-desktop
> apt unstall xfce4
> etc
Freudian typos.
On Tue 24 May 2022 at 13:27:29 +0200, Antonino Saetta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After my surrender to Jessie I've thought of moving on with Stretch.
Careful! If you go on like this you will end up installing bullseye :).
> Currently I've installed it through the net, no problems at all.
>
> So I was w
On 5/24/22 05:20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 01:27:29PM +0200, Antonino Saetta wrote:
So I was wondering, why am I asked to choose (or not) a GNOME desktop
environment, other than *Debian desktop environment*?
uncheck that box, select any other Desktop you want, or None.
by
On 5/24/22 04:53, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 24/5/22 7:27 pm, Antonino Saetta wrote:
Also, what's the lightest desktop? Default, XFCE or LXDE...?
I use Mate. It's closest to the old gnome so no fancy crap
I am with you on that.
BTW: the mate-desktop-environment-extras is a Great enhance
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 01:27:29PM +0200, Antonino Saetta wrote:
> So I was wondering, why am I asked to choose (or not) a GNOME desktop
> environment, other than *Debian desktop environment*?
>
> I thought that Debian is GNOME by default...
*sigh* It's complicated.
See, there's more than one De
On 24/5/22 7:27 pm, Antonino Saetta wrote:
Also, what's the lightest desktop? Default, XFCE or LXDE...?
I use Mate. It's closest to the old gnome so no fancy crap
Jeremy
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 01:27:29PM +0200, Antonino Saetta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After my surrender to Jessie I've thought of moving on with Stretch.
>
> Currently I've installed it through the net, no problems at all.
>
> So I was wondering, why am I asked to choose (or not) a GNOME desktop
> environ
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 09:45:47AM -0700, pjw wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 06:01 AM, Mateusz Kozłowski wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Could You tell me which debian desktop environment is the most
> > security...
>
> Apropos:
>
> Debian Moves To Non-Root X.Org Server By Default[1]
I'm afraid only if st
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 06:01 AM, Mateusz Kozłowski wrote:
>
> Hi, Could You tell me which debian desktop environment is the most
> security...
Apropos:
Debian Moves To Non-Root X.Org Server By Default[1]
Links:
1.
http://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/linux-graphics-x-org-drivers/x-org-drm
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:01:09 +0100, Mateusz Kozłowski wrote:
> Could You tell me which debian desktop environment is the most security and
> the best privacy and which You recommned for debian users? (KDE, XFCE, GNOME
> etc.)?
They're all reasonably secure. Of course, if you want to narrow your
On 15-10-27 14:01:09, Mateusz Kozłowski wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Could You tell me which debian desktop environment is the most security and
> the best privacy and which You recommned for debian users? (KDE, XFCE, GNOME
> etc.)?
>
What is your threat model?
--
Jonas Hedman
XMPP:n...@jabber
On Tuesday 27 October 2015 13:01:09 Mateusz Kozłowski wrote:
> Hi,
> Could You tell me which debian desktop environment is the most security and
> the best privacy and which You recommned for debian users? (KDE, XFCE,
> GNOME etc.)?
Speaking personally, and we will all do that, and you will get a
I agree with several other comments with regards to security not being
necessarily related to a specific desktop environment. In my opinion I
think the best security comes from using both a Linux distribution and a
desktop environment that you (or the admin) is very familiar with and
understand
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:01 +0100, Mateusz Kozłowski wrote:
> Hi,
> Could You tell me which debian desktop environment is the most
> security and the best privacy and which You recommned for debian
> users? (KDE, XFCE, GNOME etc.)?
Hand picking components and evaluating them on their own is probab
Security and privacy are not products. No software provides them as a
finished product ready for consumption. Software is just a tool used in
achieving either. One must also ask and answer: security against
_what_?. The habits of the user are just as important, and very often
they are the weake
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Mateusz Kozłowski wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Could You tell me which debian desktop environment is the most
> security and the best privacy and which You recommned for debian
> users? (KDE, XFCE, GNOME etc.)?
My opinion is that no one desktop environment is any more secure than
the ne
I hope this discussion should continue, rather than conclude, as more views
means more purity in idea.
As far as security is concerned, it is the Debian OS which determines
policies more than the DE. Also, I would like to categorize them as under:
KDE : Heavy, high-end graphics, consumes resources
I prefer xfce but why just comes down to preference, it feels cleaner,
faster and simpler, but that's just me
Only way to find out is to give them all a go (at least on livecd)
Privacy is the same across all, although gnome3 has some extra gui for some
preferences for wiping temp files i think, (
28 matches
Mail list logo
