Re: Debian 2.0 unstable

1998-03-08 Thread Britton
On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, Carroll Kong wrote: > Fails to startup... says.. "cannot solved unresolved symbols > X_global_lock > XUnlockMutex_fn > XlockMutex_fn It looks like your X server is trying to use a new library, when it expects an old one. There are a couple possible causes: 1. You have n

Re: Debian 2.0 unstable

1998-03-08 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sun, 8 Mar 1998, Henry Hollenberg wrote: > I didn't see any mention of downloading the latest "hamm" version of libc5 > _BEFORE_ you run the script. All that was mentioned was doing a clean > install of 1.3.1 and then running the script. > > I haven't done this yet but have been reading up on

Re: Debian 2.0 unstable

1998-03-08 Thread Henry Hollenberg
I didn't see any mention of downloading the latest "hamm" version of libc5 _BEFORE_ you run the script. All that was mentioned was doing a clean install of 1.3.1 and then running the script. I haven't done this yet but have been reading up on it and following the discussion on the devel list

Re: Debian 2.0 unstable

1998-03-08 Thread Carey Evans
Carroll Kong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Wow... this thing really is unstable. I got about 6 or so packages that > said that dependency errors were floating around... sigh. Well, no big deal, > right? I did what you guys said, got it installed via ftp some packages > failed, no big deal.

Re: Debian 2.0 unstable

1998-03-08 Thread Carroll Kong
Fails to startup... says.. "cannot solved unresolved symbols X_global_lock XUnlockMutex_fn XlockMutex_fn I am seriously considering nuking the partition and starting over. Or... should I ... consider Red Hat instead? Carroll Kong On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, George Bonser wrote: > > > If some pack