Ahh, well if you get stuck then i recommend you check out
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/other-formats/html_single/DNS-HOWTO.html
--
Cheers,
rinmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Like I said, I'm new and working a new job. Named is running on Red Hat
(either pc1 w/7.3 or pc2 w/9.x, I'm not sure). Regardless, I think you
gave me enough to start with come monday, well at least I have a
direction to head, anyway.
thanks -mac
Ryan Mackay wrote:
Sometime near Sat, Jan 1
Sometime near Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 09:23:12AM -0600, Mac McCaskie wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> What do I need to do to get a new site to show up in DNS? This is the
> scenario: I've just connected a pc via satalite to the net, now I want
> it to show up as a sub-part (is that the right term?) on our
At 2004-01-17T15:23:12Z, Mac McCaskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What do I need to do to get a new site to show up in DNS? This is the
> scenario: I've just connected a pc via satalite to the net, now I want it
> to show up as a sub-part (is that the right term?) on our domain.
Do you want th
Angel wrote:
> Hello!!
>
> I need to make up a dominium, but with only a server. I will like to
> use some DNS server not on my site, ¿can somebody help me? Of course I
> have static IP. And if I have to put DNS server on my machine, what can
> I use to make it?
>
> Thank you for a
You can do what you suggest.
When you register a domain name (xyz.org), you
just tell the InterNic (or whomever) the primary
and secondary name servers (provided by your
ISP, usually) for names in that domain. The
name servers answer the specific host address
for each such host (you have to tell
Not so. What's frowned upon are CNAMEs that point to other CNAMEs.
Shaleh wrote:
> I was under the impression that the use of CNAME was not smiled on. Is
> this the case? If so, what is the preferred way to handle CNAMEs?
--
Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s uns
On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 05:20:27PM -0400, Shaleh wrote:
> I was under the impression that the use of CNAME was not smiled on. Is
> this the case? If so, what is the preferred way to handle CNAMEs?
I just talked to our sysadmin at work -- he says CNAMEs are ok 'cept
when you're talking about mail
Run bindconfig
On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, eugene mendoza wrote:
>
> Hello ,
> I have a problem getting dns to start on the linux
> server.
> When i try to run named it says '/etc/named.conf'
> cannot be opened.
> I could not find such a file anywhere in the system.
> Any help in this matter will be
Rick Jones wrote:
>I should have been more specific, sorry. I wanted to know if this
>secondary that is behind the firewall, IP masq'd, can be used as far as
>internic is concerned, or if they will reject it because of the IP
>masqing?
No, Internic will not allow two name servers with the same IP
A. M. Varon wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 May 1997, Rick Jones wrote:
>
> > I think I know the answer to this already, BUT is it possible to run a
> > secondary DNS through an IP masq firewall?
> >
> > Just wondering since I'm about to network my home systems via an IP masq
> > firewall and would rather u
I should have been more specific, sorry. I wanted to know if this
secondary that is behind the firewall, IP masq'd, can be used as far as
internic is concerned, or if they will reject it because of the IP
masqing?
Does any body know? I have solved my need for a secondary but am still
curious ab
I set up a DNS on my FreeBSD box which is behind my Debian box
and it worked fine. At the time I didn't think to ask the question I
just added the secondary line to my named.boot for my ISP and
restarted named.
> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: Debian User List
> >cc: "Jens B. Jorge
On Fri, 9 May 1997, Rick Jones wrote:
> I think I know the answer to this already, BUT is it possible to run a
> secondary DNS through an IP masq firewall?
>
> Just wondering since I'm about to network my home systems via an IP masq
> firewall and would rather use one of my other systems as second
Rick Jones wrote:
>
> I think I know the answer to this already, BUT is it possible to run a
> secondary DNS through an IP masq firewall?
>
> Just wondering since I'm about to network my home systems via an IP masq
> firewall and would rather use one of my other systems as secondary.
>
> I haven
15 matches
Mail list logo
