Roman,
I've never tried this myself, but I think that other option would be
to use iptables' OUTPUT chain with "-o your virtual interface". You
can also restrict this rule to filter only DNS ports and so on.
Another option is to use static routes, like Mihamina suggested.
Cheers,
On Fri, Aug 3,
On 08/03/2012 08:05 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I have configured 2 vlan interfaces on debian lenny box. The 2
interface ip's are 192.168.6.5 and 192..168.8.5. I would like making
dns queries from this ip 192.168.6.5. What can be done to ensure that
a dns query is made using specific response ip?
* Old Crankbuster [2009-05-17 10:22:21 +0700]:
> * Michael M. Moore [2009-05-16 16:20:28 -0700]:
>
(suggested disabling ipv6 entirely)
> I'm seeing almost exactly the same thing in Fedora 11, and we're working
> on that one in those lists. I think the local isp here has broken
> servers,
* Old Crankbuster [2009-05-17 10:29:04 +0700]:
> Ah. But this a standard install with no proxy, upgraded to Sid. The
> difference between this side and that side is that I run bind9 on this
> side as caching nameserver on this box... Waitaminnit
>
For grins, I just reinstalled Lenny on t
* Alex Samad [2009-05-17 10:53:31 +1000]:
> you realise when you use a proxy the proxy does the name resolution.
> also apt can be set to use a proxy as well in apt.conf and the
> environment.
Ah. But this a standard install with no proxy, upgraded to Sid. The
difference between this side a
* Michael M. Moore [2009-05-16 16:20:28 -0700]:
> Out of curiosity, if you ping the repositories first, then run apt-get
> update, does it resolve properly and proceed with the update?
Nope, no joy. The repos do resolve with ping, however. There seems to
be something else going on when I cal
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Michael M. Moore wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 13:16 +0700, Old Crankbuster wrote:
> > * Peter Crawford [2009-05-14 10:49:54 -0700]:
> >
[snip]
> > Interestingly, have been able to solve the surfing problem in iceweasel
> > by setting the network setti
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 13:16 +0700, Old Crankbuster wrote:
> * Peter Crawford [2009-05-14 10:49:54 -0700]:
>
> > Does /etc/hosts begin thus?
> >
> > 127.0.0.1localhost.localdomainlocalhost
> > 127.0.1.1mycomputer.invalidmycomputer
> >
> > If so, try commenting the 2nd line.
>
>
* Peter Crawford [2009-05-14 10:49:54 -0700]:
> Does /etc/hosts begin thus?
>
> 127.0.0.1localhost.localdomainlocalhost
> 127.0.1.1mycomputer.invalidmycomputer
>
> If so, try commenting the 2nd line.
Tried the above, to no avail, so have reverted to original /etc/hosts
thus:
> This doesn't look like a problem with DNS.
>
> But what could it be?
Does /etc/hosts begin thus?
127.0.0.1localhost.localdomainlocalhost
127.0.1.1mycomputer.invalidmycomputer
If so, try commenting the 2nd line.
Regards, ... p. crawford
___
* Old Crankbuster [2009-05-14 19:25:48 +0700]:
> * Old Crankbuster [2009-05-14 19:22:14 +0700]:
>
>
> > $ nslookup security.debian.org
> > Server: 127.0.0.1
> > Address:127.0.0.1#53
> >
> Oops wrong output, should read:
>
> Server: 192.168.1.1
> Address: 1
* Old Crankbuster [2009-05-14 19:22:14 +0700]:
> $ nslookup security.debian.org
> Server: 127.0.0.1
> Address: 127.0.0.1#53
>
Oops wrong output, should read:
Server: 192.168.1.1
Address:192.168.1.1#53
--
Cheers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatu
* Jörg-Volker Peetz [2009-05-14 12:17:01 +0200]:
> What is the outcome of the command
>
> dig +short
>
> or alternatively
>
> nslookup
>
> ?
# apt-get update:
(truncated, all repositories return the same)
Err http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release.gpg
Could not resolve 'sec
What is the outcome of the command
dig +short
or alternatively
nslookup
?
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
* Andrei Popescu [2009-05-14 08:59:58 +0300]:
> Maybe this NEWS entry?
>
> ,[ /usr/share/doc/libc6/NEWS.Debian ]
> | glibc (2.9-8) unstable; urgency=low
> |
> | Starting with version 2.9-8, unified IPv4/IPv6 lookup have been enabled
> | in the glibc's resolver. This is faster, fixes nume
On Thu,14.May.09, 10:30:44, Old Crankbuster wrote:
[DNS troubles in sid]
> What do I need to look at?
Maybe this NEWS entry?
,[ /usr/share/doc/libc6/NEWS.Debian ]
| glibc (2.9-8) unstable; urgency=low
|
| Starting with version 2.9-8, unified IPv4/IPv6 lookup have been enabled
| in the
please include a copy of your resolv.conf ..you may have something
mispselled or not right ..
nate
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Guyren G Howe wrote:
guyren >Sorry, that was not quite right. nslookup did eventually return, with:
guyren >
guyren >*** Can't find server name for address ...: No response fro
try manually setting a DNS:
run nslookup
enter: server some.server.name (feel free to use mine ns1.firetrail.com or
ns2.firetrail.com)
then enter a domain or ip or something to query the server
if it times out it is more likely a network problem then a resolver
problem. if it works, then try yo
Sorry, that was not quite right. nslookup did eventually return, with:
*** Can't find server name for address ...: No response from server
for all three servers I have in my /etc/resolv.conf file, which are working
fine.
I can ping these same servers just fine, so I don't think it's a routing
is
> "George" == George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
George> Microsoft will not "invent" DNS until NT5. Easy way is to
George> simply insert the IP adddesses into the /etc/hosts file OR
George> buy the book "DNS and BIND" from www.ora.com and learn how
George> to build your own DNS
The /etc/resolv.conf file contains both those servers?
From: "Rudy Broersma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian User List"
Subject: DNS Lookups
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 22:44:53 +0200
Hi,
My linux boxes can't perform DNS lookups. For example, if I want to mount
an
SMB Share, I have to do somethi
21 matches
Mail list logo
