Re: DHCP Broadcast address

2001-11-13 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 08:20:17PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.11 18:45:47-0800]: > > hanasaki said: > > > Should it be 192.168.1.0 or .255 and why? > > > > > > depends on your subnet mask > > .0 will never be a broadcast address, no matter what your subne

Re: DHCP Broadcast address

2001-11-13 Thread martin f krafft
* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.11 20:31:13-0800]: > broadcast would end in 255 then. i still suggest tracking > down a subnetting chart(they are everywhere) and saving > a copy. have a look at http://jodies.de/ipcalc -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ ech

Re: DHCP Broadcast address

2001-11-13 Thread martin f krafft
* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.11 18:45:47-0800]: > hanasaki said: > > Should it be 192.168.1.0 or .255 and why? > > > depends on your subnet mask .0 will never be a broadcast address, no matter what your subnet mask is... -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \

Re: DHCP Broadcast address

2001-11-11 Thread nate
hanasaki said: > The subnet mask is > > 255.255.255.0 broadcast would end in 255 then. i still suggest tracking down a subnetting chart(they are everywhere) and saving a copy. nate

Re: DHCP Broadcast address

2001-11-11 Thread hanasaki
The subnet mask is 255.255.255.0 nate wrote: hanasaki said: Should it be 192.168.1.0 or .255 and why? depends on your subnet mask if you have an IP address of 192.168.1.0 subnet 255.255.255.252 the broadcast will be different from an ip address of 192.168.1.0 subnet 255.255.255.224 or

Re: DHCP Broadcast address

2001-11-11 Thread nate
hanasaki said: > Should it be 192.168.1.0 or .255 and why? depends on your subnet mask if you have an IP address of 192.168.1.0 subnet 255.255.255.252 the broadcast will be different from an ip address of 192.168.1.0 subnet 255.255.255.224 or 192.168.1.0 subnet 255.255.255.0 run a search for 's