Re: Correction: CDROM device..

2001-03-04 Thread Mariusz Zielinski
Hall Stevenson wrote: > > > okay, this.. is stupid question.. being completely spoilt > > by Redhats simplicity.. i'm unaware of which device > > /dev/cdrom was linked to. ..can someone, give me a hint? > > Try > > ls -l /dev/cdrom > > How's that for simplicity ?? ;-) You can even do it in com

Re: SOLVED Re: Correction: CDROM device..

2001-02-19 Thread Daniel Jones
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 03:29:37 +0100, William Leese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Monday 19 February 2001 03:19, Hall Stevenson wrote: >> > okay, this.. is stupid question.. being completely spoilt >> > by Redhats simplicity.. i'm unaware of which device >> > /dev/cdrom was linked to. ..can someone

SOLVED Re: Correction: CDROM device..

2001-02-18 Thread William Leese
On Monday 19 February 2001 03:19, Hall Stevenson wrote: > > okay, this.. is stupid question.. being completely spoilt > > by Redhats simplicity.. i'm unaware of which device > > /dev/cdrom was linked to. ..can someone, give me a hint? > > Try > > ls -l /dev/cdrom > > How's that for simplicity ?? ;-

Re: Correction: CDROM device..

2001-02-18 Thread Hall Stevenson
> okay, this.. is stupid question.. being completely spoilt > by Redhats simplicity.. i'm unaware of which device > /dev/cdrom was linked to. ..can someone, give me a hint? Try ls -l /dev/cdrom How's that for simplicity ?? ;-) Regards Hall

Re: Correction: CDROM device..

2001-02-18 Thread Cam Ellison
William Leese wrote: > > >okay, this.. is stupid question.. being completely spoilt by Redhats > >simplicity.. i'm unaware of which device /dev/cdrom was linked to. ..can > >someone, give me a hint? > > though not quite certain i think its master on the secondary channel. (makes > sense when usin