Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

also sprach Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.17.2226 +0100]: > > okay, only one catch: that's perfect for every box except for sent. > > how do i (or where should i read to find out how) tell mutt's pager to > > display whom it's to, but only in the sent box? > > folder-hook =sentbox 'set

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said: > on Sat, 14 Dec 2002 04:13:00PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated: > > It _should_, but it didn't. To fix the crazy pager settings, use this > > > > folder-hook . 'set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b%d} %-15.15n(%4c) %s"' > > > > It makes the From: appea

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

also sprach Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.17.0151 +0100]: > okay, only one catch: that's perfect for every box except for sent. > how do i (or where should i read to find out how) tell mutt's pager to > display whom it's to, but only in the sent box? folder-hook ."set index_forma

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

on Mon, 16 Dec 2002 06:02:57PM -0800, Vineet Kumar insinuated: > * Nori Heikkinen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021216 16:59]: > > on Sat, 14 Dec 2002 04:13:00PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated: > > > It _should_, but it didn't. To fix the crazy pager settings, > > > use this > > > > > > folder-hook . 'set

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

* Nori Heikkinen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021216 16:59]: > on Sat, 14 Dec 2002 04:13:00PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated: > > It _should_, but it didn't. To fix the crazy pager settings, use this > > > > folder-hook . 'set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b%d} %-15.15n(%4c) %s"' > > > > It makes the From: ap

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

on Sat, 14 Dec 2002 04:13:00PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated: > It _should_, but it didn't. To fix the crazy pager settings, use this > > folder-hook . 'set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b%d} %-15.15n(%4c) %s"' > > It makes the From: appear normally for mailing lists in the pager. okay, only one cat

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

* Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021214 13:13]: > to the original, are you replying with 'L'? I think that's how mutt > knows that it should insert that header. Nope, mutt uses M-F-T even when composing a message addressed to a known mailing list (either via the "lists" ir "subscribe" .muttrc

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

on Sat, 14 Dec 2002 04:13:00PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated: > This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said: > > probably because i'm sending mail not from my computer, because > > (other post) i can't download mail there for now. so i just > > modified my muttrc on this machine, to say > >

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

also sprach Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.14.2114 +0100]: > To reply to a mailing list you have to type L and not r ;-) i have all my listmail filed by procmail underneath the =mass/ hierarchy, so i can do this: folder-hook ."bind index g group-reply ; bind pager g group

Re: Content Management System sought

On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:40:00PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.13.2227 +0100]: > > (a) how do i set up Mail-Followup-To, for a specific list, and > > http://larve.net/people/hugo/2000/07/ml-mutt Or for the terminally lazy (like me) add

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:19:18PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > on Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:40:00PM +0100, martin f krafft insinuated: > > also sprach Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.13.2227 +0100]: > > > (a) how do i set up Mail-Followup-To, for a specific list, and > > > > http://larv

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said: > probably because i'm sending mail not from my computer, because (other > post) i can't download mail there for now. so i just modified my > muttrc on this machine, to say > > subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > and doing that made everything in my

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 the mental interface of Nori Heikkinen told: > on Sat, 14 Dec 2002 02:56:23PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated: > > This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said: > > > oh, sweet. okay. so i've probably had it set already :) > > > > Hmmm . . . just now, looking at your head

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

on Sat, 14 Dec 2002 02:56:23PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated: > This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said: > > oh, sweet. okay. so i've probably had it set already :) > > Hmmm . . . just now, looking at your headers, you don't have it set. > Not sure why, though - perhaps either send me a

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said: > oh, sweet. okay. so i've probably had it set already :) > > thanks! > > Hmmm . . . just now, looking at your headers, you don't have it set. Not sure why, though - perhaps either send me a link to your .muttrc, or send it privately? --

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

on Sat, 14 Dec 2002 01:27:43PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated: > This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said: > > but if i do that, will messages sent to SLUG to which people reply-all > > be sent to debian-user? i'm confused on this point. > > > > thanks, > > > > > > You don't need the M

Re: mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said: > on Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:40:00PM +0100, martin f krafft insinuated: > > also sprach Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.13.2227 +0100]: > > > (a) how do i set up Mail-Followup-To, for a specific list, and > > > > http://larve.net/people/h

mailto followup headers (was: Re: Content Management System sought)

on Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:40:00PM +0100, martin f krafft insinuated: > also sprach Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.13.2227 +0100]: > > (a) how do i set up Mail-Followup-To, for a specific list, and > > http://larve.net/people/hugo/2000/07/ml-mutt okay, that's great -- thanks. so i put

Re: Content Management System sought

On 12/13/2002 8:42 PM, martin f krafft pounded the keyboard with stubby fingers to type: The point being - a proper mailer like mutt makes dealing with lists very easy. If you prefer Mozilla, then you might want to consider helping out to get that functionality into Mozilla... Yep I know I've

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.14.0107 +0100]: > Well, If you followed the principle laid out in that memorandum, you'd > accept replies to your inbox, as a reply-all does that. I don't agree with > the way the list is setup btw. It's too unweldy for the reasons I outlined > prev

Re: Content Management System sought

On 12/13/2002 1:55 PM, martin f krafft pounded the keyboard with stubby fingers to type: Perhaps the powers that be, should rethink this e-mail list policy. No, please don't. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Well, If you followed the principle laid out in that memorandum, you'd

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.13.2227 +0100]: > (a) how do i set up Mail-Followup-To, for a specific list, and http://larve.net/people/hugo/2000/07/ml-mutt > (b) how is that not in conflict with munging headers? huh? because you don't munge headers that way, you jus

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.13.1939 +0100]: > What about Back-End? (http://sourceforge.net/projects/back-end/) MySQL. Over my dead body ;^> Thanks though! -- Please do not CC me! Get a proper mailer instead: www.mutt.org .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Content Management System sought

on Fri, 13 Dec 2002 07:55:43PM +0100, martin f krafft insinuated: > also sprach Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.13.1849 +0100]: > > Perhaps the powers that be, should rethink this e-mail list policy. > > No, please don't. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html okay, i've read this -- w

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.13.1849 +0100]: > I really don't know, I don't use it with PostgresSQL. However I'm sure if > you contact Plainback software directly or ask on their user forums > , they'll be more > than hap

Re: Content Management System sought

What about Back-End? (http://sourceforge.net/projects/back-end/) Disclaimer: I know nothing about it, just happened to run across it yesterday. ap -- Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin Assistant Professor of Sociology

Re: Content Management System sought

On 12/13/2002 12:30 PM, martin f krafft pounded the keyboard with stubby fingers to type: also sprach Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.13.1825 +0100]: It needs MySQL and ImageMagick too. the latter is not a problem. The former is. I run postgres only and would never switch. Yeah Postgres is

Re: Content Management System sought

On 12/13/2002 12:30 PM, martin f krafft pounded the keyboard with stubby fingers to type: Why does it need DBD::mysql then? also, the ./docs/* files in the latest (release candidate) files only mention MySQL, postgres is never mentioned. oh wait, that's because the above URL compares version 5.0

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach Randy Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.13.1832 +0100]: >My advice would be to look into PostNuke with > various modules (e.g. phpWiki). I run it on > and I think you'll see all the features there that you're looking for.

Re: Content Management System sought

On 12/13/2002 11:13 AM, martin f krafft pounded the keyboard with stubby fingers to type: It needs MySQL and ImageMagick too. the latter is not a problem. The former is. I run postgres only and would never switch. Yeah Postgres is much better and WebGUI will work with it. Perhaps take a look a

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.13.1825 +0100]: > >It needs MySQL and ImageMagick too. the latter is not a problem. The > >former is. I run postgres only and would never switch. > > Yeah Postgres is much better and WebGUI will work with it. Perhaps take a > look at

RE: Content Management System sought

> -Original Message- > From: martin f krafft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 2:35 AM > To: debian users > Subject: Re: Content Management System sought > > > also sprach Charlie Reiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.12.1936 +01

Re: Content Management System sought

Do you know any other software pieces that feature the above and are preferably contained in Debian? My advice would be to look into PostNuke with various modules (e.g. phpWiki). I run it on and I think you'll see all the features there

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.12.2158 +0100]: > Check out WebGUI - I'm surprised no-one has suggested it, one of the best > Linux CMS. It needs MySQL and ImageMagick too. the latter is not a problem. The former is. I run postgres only and would never switch. -- Please do not CC

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.12.2101 +0100]: > note thats a source package :) last time I tried it, it wasn't really > worth it, the person who made it, didn't really complete it so its pretty > much like packaging a few .tar.gz files into a .deb with a README. right. i have sinc

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach Charlie Reiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.12.1936 +0100]: > True. And most Zopers think DTML is evil as well and folks should be > switching to ZPT. But I understand your need to keep the users happy. Can you point me to a ZPT reference? Sounds awesome... > So there's a bit of a hol

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.12.1927 +0100]: > If it's just xfree86-common, that shouldn't be too much of a problem ... > that package doesn't contain much. It's xlibs mainly. The 'client libraries' which I shouldn't need on a server, even if it does CMS. -- Please do no

Re: Content Management System sought

martin f krafft said: > there's one for woody: > > pool/main/e/ezpublish/ezpublish-src_2.2.6-0.woody.1_all.deb > > but my first negative argument: it depends on libmagic and thus pulls in > xfree86-common, which I don't want or need on a server. note thats a source package :) last time I tried

RE: Content Management System sought

> -Original Message- > From: martin f krafft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 8:59 AM > To: debian users > Subject: Re: Content Management System sought > > > also sprach Charlie Reiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.12.001

Re: Content Management System sought

On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 05:56:32PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.12.0011 +0100]: > > there is a source package for eZpublish but I reccomend going with > > the real distribution, probably more up to date(last I checked there > > was no binary distribu

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.12.0403 +0100]: > postnuke the debian package needs mysql. no way! postgres here. > phpnuke this is totally slashdot like, is it not? (and so is postnuke)? > tikiwiki it's a wiki. we don't want a wiki. we want a CMS.

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach Charlie Reiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.12.0017 +0100]: > Zope does do PHP: > > http://www.zope.org/Members/hewei/PHParser cool. > I haven't used it. I can't imagine why you'd want to support PHP in Zope if > you are starting from scratch. because i am only the admin and need to

Re: Content Management System sought

also sprach nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.12.0011 +0100]: > there is a source package for eZpublish but I reccomend going with > the real distribution, probably more up to date(last I checked there > was no binary distribution included with debian 3). there's one for woody: pool/main/e/ezpu

Re: Content Management System sought

-- martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Wednesday, 11 December 2002, 11:36 PM +0100): > My lab wants to institute a CMS to handle the entire website. I have > a little experience with Zope and it's pretty nice, but I would like > to get some alternatives before suggesting it. > > We basic

RE: Content Management System sought

> -Original Message- > From: martin f krafft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 2:37 PM > To: debian users > Subject: Content Management System sought > > > Folks, > > My lab wants to institute a CMS to handle the entire website. I have > a little experience w

Re: Content Management System sought

martin f krafft said: > Folks, > > My lab wants to institute a CMS to handle the entire website. I have a > little experience with Zope and it's pretty nice, but I would like to get > some alternatives before suggesting it. > > We basically need: how about eZpublish? http://developer.ez.no/ its