Thank You for Your time and answer, Hugo:
>> Also I can not use option "DRI" in Section "Device" - Xserver does not start
>> then.
>and the log? What does the log say?
For now I have downgraded all the xserver-xorg* packages - back to stable,
therefore, now X loads with the option, at least
Sthu Deus wrote:
Good day.
Could You please help me with my X server config.
I'm trying to use only external monitor connected to a laptop and all is fine
except that I have no 3D-support and also mplayer when playing movies shows it
only in full screen mode and refuses to show it in its win
>But as mentioned, I'm unclear on what you're seeing, so something odd
>may be happening. You should just be able to:
Very true. It just needed a apt-get -f install. Everything (except low quality graphics and unavailable sound), is working fine. I m lovin' it!!! Trying to update xfree86 to 4.3;
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> >Also, is 192.168.1.1 a real DNS server? I suspect that is pointing to
> >your router, and I suspect it should be pointing to your ISP's DNS
> >server(s). That might be configurable in your router's web interface, or
> >you can just change your resolv.conf file for a q
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 20 May 2005 Kent West wrote :
> >shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> >
> > > # The first network card - this entry was created during the Debian
> > > installationauto eth0
> > > iface eth0 inet dhcp
> > >
> >If the "auto eth0" really is not on its own line, i
On Fri, 20 May 2005 Kent West wrote :
>shatam bhattacharya wrote:
>
> > # The first network card - this entry was created during the Debian
> > installationauto eth0
> > iface eth0 inet dhcp
> >
>If the "auto eth0" really is not on its own line, it needs to be.
>Otherwise, that looks okay.
Pl
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> # The first network card - this entry was created during the Debian
> installationauto eth0
> iface eth0 inet dhcp
>
If the "auto eth0" really is not on its own line, it needs to be.
Otherwise, that looks okay.
What's in your "/etc/resolv.conf" file?
--
Kent West
T
On Fri, 20 May 2005 Kent West wrote :
>shatam bhattacharya wrote:
>
> > > > >deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free
> > > > 0% [Connecting to security.debian.org (1.0.0.0)]
> >
> > My DSL router has a web based configuration. The DNS tab has the
> > following opti
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> > > >deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free
> > > 0% [Connecting to security.debian.org (1.0.0.0)]
>
> My DSL router has a web based configuration. The DNS tab has the
> following options --
> 1) Use User Discovered DNS server Only
> 2) Use
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2005 Kent West wrote :
> >shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> > > 2) I still cant apt-get update (the same problem i.e. (1.0.0.0)
> > > hang persists.)
> > > the sources.list is
> > > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> > >
> >Notice mine does
On Thu, 19 May 2005 Kent West wrote :
>shatam bhattacharya wrote:
>
> > > > 2) I still cant apt-get update (the same problem i.e. (1.0.0.0)
> > hang persists.)
> > the sources.list is
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> >
>Notice mine does not have a slash after ".org".
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:24:04AM -, shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> > > 2) I still cant apt-get update (the same problem i.e. (1.0.0.0) hang
> > > persists.)
> >... if I remember rightly, you recently posted your dmesg output
> >which showed your single ethernet card being recognized twice - as
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> > > 2) I still cant apt-get update (the same problem i.e. (1.0.0.0)
> hang persists.)
> the sources.list is
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
>
Notice mine does not have a slash after ".org". Perhaps it'll make a
difference?
deb http://security.deb
Forgive me if[sic] this is irrelevant nonsense (I know precious
little about this stuff; I've only been scrutinizing the ouput
you have provided), but ...
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:20:29PM -, shatam bhattacharya wrote:
[...]
> 2) I still cant apt-get update (the same problem i.e. (1.0.0.0
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> >I assume the "1.0.0.0" is what your system believes the IP address to
> >be for debian.org. If so, then something's seriously hosed with your
> >DNS lookups.
>
> I am using a telephone line DSL (make Dlink 502T router) and ethernet
> card (Realtek 8139 PCI Fast Ethern
>I suspect you'll want that file. Here's what mine looks like:
>
> > enjae[westk]:/etc/apt/apt.conf.d> cat 70debconf
> > // Pre-configure all packages with debconf before they are installed.
> > // If you don't like it, comment it out.
> > DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs {"/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt
>I suspect you'll want that file. Here's what mine looks like:
>
> > enjae[westk]:/etc/apt/apt.conf.d> cat 70debconf
> > // Pre-configure all packages with debconf before they are installed.
> > // If you don't like it, comment it out.
> > DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs {"/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> One more thing there was a directory called apt.conf.d in /etc/apt.
> This had a file called 70debconf. when I removed the file, the
> apt-get update started working!!!.
>
I suspect you'll want that file. Here's what mine looks like:
> enjae[westk]:/etc/apt/apt.con
>I assume this is a type, and you meant "apt.conf". In which directory >do you find this file? (My installation does not seem to have such a > >sample file.)
the apt.conf is in /etc/apt/
>Is this still part of the "apt.conf" file listing above, or a separate >file?
The sources.list is in /etc/apt/
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> I think its just a problem with apt configuration. plz have a look.
>
Since you otherwise have net capability, I agree.
>
> >You can "surf on the net and ping sites from the console" in Debian
> or in XP?
> I can surf the net on Debian.
> >What's the result of "
Hi,
I think its just a problem with apt configuration. plz have a look.
>You can "surf on the net and ping sites from the console" in Debian >or in XP?
I can surf the net on Debian. Although its tough time using the quality of X I have got!!
>That information's not quite clear from your pa
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 15 May 2005 Kent West wrote :
> >shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 15 May 2005 Kent West wrote :
> > > >I highly recommend you upgrade to Testing or Sid
> > > As advised by you I am currently downloading sarge ISO images.
> > >
> >If you're
>If you're on a network, don't bother with downloading the ISO images.
>Just change your "/etc/apt/sources.list" file to change all occurences
>of "stable" to "sarge" (except the security line; leave it at "stable"),
>then run the two commands "apt-get update" and "apt-get dist-upgrade".
How do I
>If you're on a network, don't bother with downloading the ISO images.
>Just change your "/etc/apt/sources.list" file to change all occurences
>of "stable" to "sarge" (except the security line; leave it at "stable"),
>then run the two commands "apt-get update" and "apt-get dist-upgrade".
How do I
On Sun, 15 May 2005 Kent West wrote :
>shatam bhattacharya wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 15 May 2005 Kent West wrote :
> > >shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am having trouble in configuring X on my system.
> > >
> > >I highly recommend you upgrade to Testing or Sid
> > As advised
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 15 May 2005 Kent West wrote :
> >shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> >
> > > I am having trouble in configuring X on my system.
> >
> >I highly recommend you upgrade to Testing or Sid
> As advised by you I am currently downloading sarge ISO images.
>
If you're
Kent West wrote:
-Intel 82845 GL motherboard
uname -r says
2.2.20-idepci
I highly recommend you upgrade to Testing or Sid (unless you have some
reason to stay on Woody, assuming that's what you're running). You'll
get a newer version of X, and a 2.4 kernel is just an apt-get install
away
shatam bhattacharya wrote:
> I am having trouble in configuring X on my system. I am using the
> following configuration
> -Intel 82845 GL motherboard
>
> uname -r says
> 2.2.20-idepci
>
> XFree86 Version 4.1.0.1 / X Window System
> (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6510)
> Rel
--- Shawn McCuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi;
> I cannot remember what to type in my shell to bring
> up the xfree86
> configuration tool so I can set my resolution higher
> than the current
> 800x600 that is driving me insane. Ive tried
>
> xfree86 --config
> xfree86config
>
> And I beli
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:11:16PM -0500, Shawn McCuan wrote:
> Hi;
> I cannot remember what to type in my shell to bring up the xfree86
> configuration tool so I can set my resolution higher than the current
> 800x600 that is driving me insane. Ive tried
>
> xfree86 --config
> xfree86config
I
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 04:11, Shawn McCuan wrote:
> Hi;
> I cannot remember what to type in my shell to bring up the xfree86
> configuration tool so I can set my resolution higher than the current
> 800x600 that is driving me insane. Ive tried
>
> xfree86 --config
> xfree86config
>
> And I beliv
Hi
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:11:16PM -0500, Shawn McCuan wrote:
> Hi;
> I cannot remember what to type in my shell to bring up the xfree86
> configuration tool so I can set my resolution higher than the current
> 800x600 that is driving me insane. Ive tried
>
> xfree86 --config
> xfree86config
On 2004-11-15T23:11:16-0500, Shawn McCuan wrote:
> I cannot remember what to type in my shell to bring up the xfree86
> configuration tool so I can set my resolution higher than the current
> 800x600 that is driving me insane. Ive tried
>
> xfree86 --config
> xfree86config
xf86config, or you ca
maybe somebody already suggested this, but, you can make xdm write
a default config file if you feed it the right option - "xdm --help"
will list the options, I think (and it may not be in the docs...)
I had to do that to get the display to work at all; the default config
file that the Debian inst
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Paul Akkermans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just a simple question (I hope). I am trying to configure my Xfree86
> (version 4.1.0.1) but I don't know how to do this. Can anybody help me?
The easiest, fastest w
Hello
Paul Akkermans (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have just a simple question (I hope). I am trying to configure my
> Xfree86 (version 4.1.0.1) but I don't know how to do this. Can anybody
> help me?
apt-get install x-window-system-core
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
xf86config
xf86cfg
n
Janjs Jangori wrote:
Many thanks Kent.
The magic number PCI:1:0:0 worked!!!. For the first time I saw the
GENOME desktop on my own PC :-). However, the writings are blurred and
the mouse pointer is big, but at least I can click and something
happens. Oh! my God I have a lot of fiddling to do.
I
Many thanks Kent.
The magic number PCI:1:0:0 worked!!!. For the first time I saw the GENOME
desktop on my own PC :-). However, the writings are blurred and the mouse
pointer is big, but at least I can click and something happens. Oh! my God I
have a lot of fiddling to do.
I guess I can edit /etc
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 12:18:35AM +0300, Janjs Jangori wrote:
>
>
> Confession: Am a complete novice and just had my first Linux installed by
> following the
> 'Installing Debian Linux 3.0(Woody)'.
I would go with the new beta installer and install either testing (the
default with the regular
Janjs Jangori wrote:
Confession: Am a complete novice and just had my first Linux installed
by following the
'Installing Debian Linux 3.0(Woody)'.
However, when I login as root and type startx to get my GUI running I
get the err message
x connection to :0.0 broken (Explicit kill or Server Shutd
HectorScaramelli wrote:
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 23:03, Kent West wrote:
.
kdm actually changes fully
between the wm/dm. If you want to try kdm, just:
apt-get install kdm
and you'll be asked which session manager you want to use. Later if you
want to change which one you use:
dpkg-reconf
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 23:03, Kent West wrote:
.
>
> >kdm actually changes fully
> >
> >
> >>between the wm/dm. If you want to try kdm, just:
> >> apt-get install kdm
> >>and you'll be asked which session manager you want to use. Later if you
> >>want to change which one you use:
> >> dpkg-re
HectorScaramelli wrote:
Not at the login screen. Later during the gnome session I found a menu
where to set the default window manager.
I believe I'm vaguely familiar with this menu; if I'm right, this only
affects the default wm within Gnome, and doesn't have anything to do
with whether the
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 20:21, Kent West wrote:
> HectorScaramelli wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 17:48, Kent West wrote:
> >
> >
> >>HectorScaramelli wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I need help on learning how to install Debian so I can start X with any
> >>>desired window manage
HectorScaramelli wrote:
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 17:48, Kent West wrote:
HectorScaramelli wrote:
Hi,
I need help on learning how to install Debian so I can start X with any
desired window manager ie. icevwm, blackbox by default.
You can set this on a user-by-user basis by creating a
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 17:48, Kent West wrote:
> HectorScaramelli wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I need help on learning how to install Debian so I can start X with any
> >desired window manager ie. icevwm, blackbox by default.
> >
> Are you asking how to install Debian, or are you asking how to startx
>
HectorScaramelli wrote:
Hi,
I need help on learning how to install Debian so I can start X with any
desired window manager ie. icevwm, blackbox by default.
Are you asking how to install Debian, or are you asking how to startx
with your preferred wm? Assuming the latter.
Or any suggestion on whi
On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 01:48, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Hello
>
> (please don't top post)
I hope I didn't top post this time.
[snip]
> Kind of dificult to edit the file if you can't read the letters on the
> screen. It is somehow possible to make lilo ask you (I think some key
> combination was n
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Joseph:
How to configure X in Debian.
lists.debian.org is your friend. I _think_ the answer is
"dpkg-reconfigure xfree86", but check that.
I must have don't some configuration incorrectly as I can not read any
fonts on the screen.
Ctrl+Alt+1 is showing
Hello
(please don't top post)
Joseph (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>>> I must have don't some configuration incorrectly as I can not read
>>> any fonts on the screen.
>>> Ctrl+Alt+1 is showing the same unreadable fonts.
>>
>> F1 gets you from X Window to the console. F7
>> gets you back to X.
>
My problem is that F1 is showing the same "garbage" on the
screen as F7
I think I have to un-install X-server along with configuration files and
reinstall it again.
What is the command to un-install X-server along with config files.
--
Thanks,
Joseph
> > I must have don't some configuration inco
Joseph wrote:
How to configure X in Debian.
I must have don't some configuration incorrectly as I can not read any
fonts on the screen.
Ctrl+Alt+1 is showing the same unreadable fonts.
Perhaps you have some internationalization settings set incorrectly. I'm
afraid int'l'zation is beyond me.
Incoming from Joseph:
> How to configure X in Debian.
lists.debian.org is your friend. I _think_ the answer is
"dpkg-reconfigure xfree86", but check that.
> I must have don't some configuration incorrectly as I can not read any
> fonts on the screen.
> Ctrl+Alt+1 is showing the same unreadable
s far
as I can remeber, that was the only thing that I did.
As for twm, I'll get rid of it and see what happens. Thanks for the help.
bp
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bruce Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: configuring X
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 07:53:11PM -0500, Bruce Park wrote:
> I've got a few questions regarding X. I hope that someone can help me to
> solve these problems.
> 1. I need to configure X so that I can use xfont-75dpi. I currently have
> xfont-100dpi and I cannot get rid of this since it will get r
Bruce Park wrote:
Hello all,
I've got a few questions regarding X. I hope that someone can help me to
solve these problems.
1. I need to configure X so that I can use xfont-75dpi. I currently have
xfont-100dpi and I cannot get rid of this since it will get rid of the
x-window-system as well. S
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 07:53:11PM -0500, Bruce Park wrote:
| Hello all,
|
| I've got a few questions regarding X. I hope that someone can help me to
| solve these problems.
| 1. I need to configure X so that I can use xfont-75dpi. I currently have
| xfont-100dpi and I cannot get rid of this sin
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 07:53:11PM -0500, Bruce Park wrote:
> I've got a few questions regarding X. I hope that someone can help me to
> solve these problems.
> 1. I need to configure X so that I can use xfont-75dpi. I currently have
> xfont-100dpi and I cannot get rid of this since it will get r
On Wed, 2002-02-20 at 07:53, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> Otherwise, you'd need to modify your XF86Config-4 file or restart X with
> another color depth preference. Note that if this is for certain
> ill-behaved apps, Xnest might buy you what you're looking for.
>
Thanks Karsten. I have it work
on Tue, Feb 19, 2002, Patrick Kirk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is recommended as a grpahical package that allows you change
> resolutions, depth, fonts, etc. under X? Something along the lones of
> the Windows Display applet.
There isn't one per se.
You can't resize both the
Gary Turner wrote:
> The i810(e) is not supported in potato.
More specifically, it is not supported in XFree86 3.3, which is the
version in Potato -- although I understand that it should be possible to
obtain an i810 X server from Intel to plug into XFree86 3.3, at which
point it should work.
If
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 08:00:55 +0530, shyamk wrote:
>I am having problem in
>configuring X on Potato r3 for an on-board Mercury(810) Display.
>I get only 8bpp while Win98 is crystal clear.I am sulking because
>I want to shift completely to Debian , even the pictures.
>As you can guess , the list of
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 08:00:55AM +0530, shyamk wrote:
> I am having problem in
> configuring X on Potato r3 for an on-board Mercury(810) Display.
> I get only 8bpp while Win98 is crystal clear.I am sulking because
> I want to shift completely to Debian , even the pictures.
> As you can guess , th
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 08:00:55AM +0530, shyamk wrote:
| I am having problem in
| configuring X on Potato r3 for an on-board Mercury(810) Display.
| I get only 8bpp while Win98 is crystal clear.I am sulking because
| I want to shift completely to Debian , even the pictures.
| As you can guess , th
Eric Smith wrote:
| According to D. on Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 04:39:12AM -0800:
| > try dpkg-configure xserver-xfree86 That is assuming
| > that it downloaded when you upgraded. Check to make
| > sure that you have it installed.
| nope
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] $ dpkg --configure xserver-
Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> According to D. on Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 04:39:12AM -0800:
> > try dpkg-configure xserver-xfree86 That is assuming
> > that it downloaded when you upgraded. Check to make
> > sure that you have it installed.
> nope
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] $ dpkg --conf
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:46:15PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] $ dpkg --configure xserver-xfree86
> dpkg: error processing xserver-xfree86 (--configure):
> package xserver-xfree86 is already installed and configured
>
> I am looking for I think the debconf interface - like w
According to D. on Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 04:39:12AM -0800:
> try dpkg-configure xserver-xfree86 That is assuming
> that it downloaded when you upgraded. Check to make
> sure that you have it installed.
nope
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] $ dpkg --configure xserver-xfree86
dpkg: error processing xserver-x
try dpkg-configure xserver-xfree86 That is assuming
that it downloaded when you upgraded. Check to make
sure that you have it installed.
--- Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not like to hack Xf86Config and xf86config dont
> work in
> unstable, what should I use to optimise the display
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:29:32PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I have been trying to install Debian on my Toshiba 2180CDT laptop.
:But I just can't get X server to work.
I'm not familiar with your hardware but you might look up info on your
laptop at http://www.linux.org/hardware/laptop.html
Paragraphs are good, Rubbish.
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 08:45:51PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So my setup: I'm using Debian 2.2. I just did a full upgrade of
> whatever Debian's newest of everything is, so I'm not quite sure what
> version of X I've got, but I'm pretty much positive it's 3
As I recall, CTRL-ALT-F1, issued multiple times will break you out
of this. If you started from the first tty, you might have to use
CTL-ALT-F2. Then you can kill X from the console. Hope this helps.
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: X is a big meanie :-)
: Okay, well actually it's my own inab
I would make 2 XF86Config files (eg. one called XF86Config-int and one
called XF86Config-ext) and create to scripts (eg. startx-internal and
startx-monitor), in those scripts, a file /etc/X11/XF86Config is removed,
a symlink is made to the needed config file, with the name
/etc/X11/XF86Config, afte
> --
> What am I doing wrong ? I've tried selecting different mouse and
> keyboard
> options, but still get the same error.
>
i'm not sure, but i have the impression, that exactly the same question
came up some days ago on this list, so please look at the archives.
if you find noth
>
> Hi,
> Due to the advice of a few wise individuals, I continue to make
> slow, but steady progress in getting Debian 2.1 installed on my IBM
> 390E laptop. I am a newbie and am currently trying to get X Windows
> running. I have tried both xf86config and XF86Setup and still am having
>
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 10:24:09PM -0400, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> (A little background): My video card is a NeoMagic 256AV with
> 2.5meg of memory. My screen is capable of 1024 X 768 resolution at
> 60kHz.
^^^
kHz: WOW, that is one mean laptop; even my desktop monitor can't go
that fas
Looking at http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/linux-laptop/ I
found 4 links for that model. Of those 4, only one had any real
info. Take a look at
http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/computing/ThinkPad/ Looks like what you
need is there.
--
Mike Werner KA8YSD | "Where do you want to g
The first thing I think you should do is reconfigure your xserver using PS/2
as the protocal, just because it a microsoft mouse doesn't mean it's
microsoft protocal. With your window manager being twm all you should get is
a checkered screen on the inital start up. twm is VERY basic. After the
mous
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 03:27:59PM -0600, Brian Morgan wrote:
> Can someone help me find the xf86setup graphical setup for X? I'm having
> trouble getting the mouse just right, and would like to use the graphical
> setup to make this work.
If you're running hamm, it's in the xserver-vga16 package
Brian Morgan wrote:
>
> Can someone help me find the xf86setup graphical setup for X? I'm
> having trouble getting the mouse just right, and would like to use the
> graphical setup to make this work.
It is called "XF86Setup", and not "xf86setup".
You can use "locate XF86Setup" if its not in
ay, January 21, 1999 2:42 PM
> To: Brian Morgan
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: configuring X
>
>
> On 21 Jan 1999q, Brian Morgan wrote:
> > I'm trying to get X up and running on a laptop, but I don't
> know the specs
> > for the video.
On 21 Jan 1999q, Brian Morgan wrote:
> I'm trying to get X up and running on a laptop, but I don't know the specs
> for the video. I do know that it's capable of running 800x600 in 16bit
> color (not sure about refresh rate). Isn't there a simpler way than running
> the xf86config script to setup
At 02:00 PM 1/21/1999 -0600, Brian Morgan wrote:
>I'm trying to get X up and running on a laptop, but I don't know the specs
>for the video. I do know that it's capable of running 800x600 in 16bit
>color (not sure about refresh rate). Isn't there a simpler way than running
>the xf86config script
In a message dated 1/21/99 3:05:18 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm trying to get X up and running on a laptop, but I don't know the specs
> for the video. I do know that it's capable of running 800x600 in 16bit
> color (not sure about refresh rate). Isn't there a simp
At 09:15 AM 12/11/1998 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Ok, I'm very frustrated with X right now. Could someone who is going to
>be online for awhile email me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and lend a hand with
>setting things up. Thanks.
>
>Tom
I may not be much help, but what're the issues?
Well, can you change increase the screen resolution?
If not.well, then you might have to customize a little, or use options
when calling programs.
Andrew
Never include a comment that will help | Andrew Ivanov
someone else u
Alrighty. I got it to work thanks everyone for your support. Now
though,
All the programs are too big for the screen. I have to move the mouse
to the top of the screen to have it roll. Is there a way to change
this. I think the X program is the one that simulates Win 95.
Thanks.
Or, if you can not call the xf86config,
just change the modes in the setup file to 480x320 and see if it runs.
Never include a comment that will help | Andrew Ivanov
someone else understand your code. | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If
>
> Warning: The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" does not exist.
> Entry deleted from path.
> Warning: The directory "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" does not exist
> Entry deleted from path.
This is fine, just it can not find some of your fonts path to which is
specified
At 04:27 PM 12/2/1998 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Since I've been told this might help out others in the group...
>This is what I get when I type startx
>
>[bunch of stuff scrolls by and then the screen blanks out for a second
>and then the screen says]
>
>Warning: The directory "/usr/X11R6/li
On Wed, 2 Dec 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since I've been told this might help out others in the group...
> This is what I get when I type startx
We also need /etc/X11/XF86Config
Matthew
> [bunch of stuff scrolls by and then the screen blanks out for a second
> and then the screen says]
>
At 03:40 PM 12/2/1998 -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
>On Wed, 2 Dec 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I'm having problems configuring the X server. Instead of going into
>> detail and cluttering up the list could one of you Linux Gurus email me
>> to lend a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 2 Dec 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm having problems configuring the X server. Instead of going into
> detail and cluttering up the list could one of you Linux Gurus email me
> to lend a hand. Thanks a bunch.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is probably e
On Thu, May 21, 1998 at 04:40:59PM -0400, Gutraind wrote:
> Hi!
> I have K6 200MHZ, 32M ram and win95/debian 1.3
> that I 've installed only recently.
> Slowly I'm getting used to linux, and was trying to install X windows.
> I found both my Video Card and Monitor in the drivers available,
> but ha
94 matches
Mail list logo
