Kent West wrote:
2)
If you're really running a 386, that kernel is acceptable, but if
you've got a Pentium-class machine, you might want to upgrade to a
-586, or -686, or -K7, etc kernel, which is optimized for these other
CPUs. Just do an "apt-get search kernel-image | more" to see what
kernel
Adam Funk wrote:
I've done that sort of thing before so I'll stick with it instead of
using the GUI version [e.g. 'modconf' - Kent]. Which of these modules do I need to
load for
this?
/lib/modules/2.4.23-1-386/kernel/drivers/acpi/ac.o
/lib/modules/2.4.23-1-386/kernel/drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.o
/lib
Adam Funk wrote:
I've done that sort of thing before so I'll stick with it instead of
using the GUI version [e.g. 'modconf' - Kent]. Which of these modules do I need to
load for
this?
/lib/modules/2.4.23-1-386/kernel/drivers/acpi/ac.o
/lib/modules/2.4.23-1-386/kernel/drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.o
/lib
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Piers Kittel wrote:
Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but
now I find that they both don't power the computer off automatically, I
have to push the power button manually when the computers has shut down
- how to make it
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Piers Kittel wrote:
> Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but
> now I find that they both don't power the computer off automatically, I
> have to push the power button manually when the computers has shut down
> - how to make it turn itself off no
On Friday 27 August 2004 04:10, Kent West wrote:
> It's a point-and-click type application for loading/unloading modules.
> In addition, it'll add (and remove?) module entries from
> "/etc/modules".
>
> If you know the name of the module you wish to install (see
> /lib/modules/[kernel-version/ di
Adam Funk wrote:
On Thursday 26 August 2004 16:00, Kent West wrote:
I think what Adam might want to do is to run "modconf", go down to the
"kernel/drivers/acpi" section, and install any necessary features in
that manner. (I think different versions of modconf look different, so
if you're not run
On Thursday 26 August 2004 16:00, Kent West wrote:
> I think it's a good learning process to be able to roll your own, but
> just to get standard hardware features to work, it's a bit overkill
> for the majority of new users coming into the GNU/Linux camp. (Still,
> as Loki says, it's a good thing
Loki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Adam Funk wrote:
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 20:10, Adam Funk wrote:
How do you enable APM or ACPI in the kernel?
Let me rephrase that. How can I enable ACPI in a stock Debian kernel?
(I have no experienc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Adam Funk wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 August 2004 20:10, Adam Funk wrote:
>
> > How do you enable APM or ACPI in the kernel?
>
> Let me rephrase that. How can I enable ACPI in a stock Debian kernel?
> (I have no experience in compil
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 20:10, Adam Funk wrote:
> How do you enable APM or ACPI in the kernel?
Let me rephrase that. How can I enable ACPI in a stock Debian kernel?
(I have no experience in compiling my own kernel.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:21:52PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> It is by no means obsolete. I use it in place of ACPI where necessary, since
> ACPI support has been more flaky than pie pastry.
Oops. Must have misremebered...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
cd into your kernel source directory, and start the configuration
program ('make menuconfig' in most cases..)
you will need to have 'make' and other tools installed in order to do so
(ncurses and a bunch of other dependencies)
in your kernel config, go to the power management section and choose
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:16:57PM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> Last I heard APM is obsolete in favor of ACPI, but I use APM instead
> because my {2.2.20 kernel, motherboard} doesn't support ACPI.
It is by no means obsolete. I use it in place of ACPI where necessary, since
ACPI support has been
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 06:49:39PM +, Adam Funk wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 August 2004 22:20, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:09:02PM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote:
> >> Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but
> >> now I find that they both don't pow
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 22:20, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:09:02PM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote:
>> Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but
>> now I find that they both don't power the computer off automatically,
>> I have to push the power button
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:09:02PM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote:
> Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but
> now I find that they both don't power the computer off automatically, I
> have to push the power button manually when the computers has shut down
> - how to mak
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:09:02PM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote:
> Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but
> now I find that they both don't power the computer off automatically, I
> have to push the power button manually when the computers has shut down
> - how to mak
18 matches
Mail list logo
