Re: Complex IPv6 setup

2011-07-12 Thread William Hopkins
On 07/12/11 at 09:42am, Stephan Seitz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:05:16PM -0400, William Hopkins wrote: > >needed so default gateway is on the SLAAC NIC. The real question > >is why are you concerned with 'randomizing' your IP? The prefix is > >what people will know you by, and the prefix w

Re: Complex IPv6 setup

2011-07-12 Thread Stephan Seitz
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:23:59AM +0200, Erwan David wrote: Wins : does it still exist ? You’re right. WINS and IPv6 are not working together. My fault. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan Seitz E-Mail: s...@fsing.rootsland.net | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.r

Re: Complex IPv6 setup

2011-07-12 Thread Erwan David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/11 09:42, Stephan Seitz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:05:16PM -0400, William Hopkins wrote: >> needed so default gateway is on the SLAAC NIC. The real question >> is why are you concerned with 'randomizing' your IP? The prefix is >> what

Re: Complex IPv6 setup

2011-07-12 Thread Stephan Seitz
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:05:16PM -0400, William Hopkins wrote: needed so default gateway is on the SLAAC NIC. The real question is why are you concerned with 'randomizing' your IP? The prefix is what people will know you by, and the prefix will not change. All IP-based tracking will recognize

Re: Complex IPv6 setup (was: Does IPv6 preclude use of a NAT gateway?)

2011-07-11 Thread William Hopkins
On 07/10/11 at 01:42pm, Stephan Seitz wrote: > On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:47:59PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > >Liam writes: > >>The remote side will know your actual IP address... > >One of the 2^64 at your disposal. > [...] > With IPv6 all my internal hosts have for now fixed external IPv6 > addr