On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 16:03 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, I've tried recompiling 2.6.9 with the various options I think I want,
> setting some items as modules and so on. make-kpkg runs for ages, lots of
> screen output (lists of files or modules with CC next to them, etc) and then
> I g
OK, I've tried recompiling 2.6.9 with the various options I think I want,
setting some items as modules and so on. make-kpkg runs for ages, lots of
screen output (lists of files or modules with CC next to them, etc) and then
I get lots of "unrecognised symbol" errors (I think that's what it said
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> kernels, some even boot but none does what I want. One thing I need to
> know is how to get modules to compile... there doesn't seem to be any
Most modules come with the kernel source code, you just have to compile
them as modules (i.e. 'm' instead of 'y' or in menuconfi
Brian wrote:
> I want to be able to turn some options off and on in the kerenl so how
> do i compile the kernel in a debian system???
>
>
> Thanks
> Brian
Look at this site: http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/
It has a very comprehensive explanation on how to compile
your own kernel the Debian way.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 12:13:05AM -0600, Brian wrote:
> I want to be able to turn some options off and on in the kerenl so how
> do i compile the kernel in a debian system???
install "kernel-package" with apt-get and then use "make-kpkg"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
On Saturday 05 July 2003 5:09 am, Christophe Courtois wrote:
> Le Samedi 5 Juillet 2003 10:24, Marino Fernandez a déclamé :
> > Yes, that's what it seems. I had the same problem with 2.4.21... GCC
> > 2.95 and 3.2 work, but no 3.3.
>
From a practical standpoint (in other words... have I noticed any
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:49:05 +0200
Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tried to compile a 2.4.20 kernel with GCC 3.3 and failed.
> I searched through several list and the web to find more infos. I found
> some docs about GCC3.1 and its implemetation (wich isnt).
>
> Just to be
Le Samedi 5 Juillet 2003 10:24, Marino Fernandez a déclamé :
> Yes, that's what it seems. I had the same problem with 2.4.21... GCC
> 2.95 and 3.2 work, but no 3.3.
I compile with 2.95 ; is there a difference for a user with 3.2 ?
--
Christophe Courtois - Ostwald, Alsace, France
http://www.cou
On Saturday 05 July 2003 2:49 am, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tried to compile a 2.4.20 kernel with GCC 3.3 and failed.
> I searched through several list and the web to find more infos. I found
> some docs about GCC3.1 and its implemetation (wich isnt).
>
> Just to be sure: We still must us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Could those in the know of things , please outline how you would compile a
>kernel
>(the steps) on a RedHat 7.0 system ?
Recently checked the user's manual on RH7.0 - doesn't mention custom-
compiling the kernel. I believe it's the traditional style (make dep,
make {me
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
> I have a new kind of doubt ..
> Could those in the know of things , please outline how you would compile a
> kernel
> (the steps) on a RedHat 7.0 system ?
> Mr.Bish had done so for a Debian system as a footer on one of his mails .
>
> I am having a current requi
>> 3) In windows there is the idea of formating a partition
>> or a floppy. Debian installation seem to do something similar.
>> How does it work in Linux, and what is the utility that does it?
I believe mkfs formatts a partition for linux (it doesn't make the partition).
This is done mostly tr
Thomas Delany wrote:
>
> Re 3) I don't have a lot of experience with this as I've usually just let
> the Debian install procedure set up the hard disk for me. As far as
> partitioning the drive goes, Linux has an fdisk utility that is sort of the
> counterpart of the MS-DOS / Windows fdisk utili
y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alexander Gutfraind (Sasha)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: compiling the kernel
> Re: 1) The file System.map is created in the /usr/src/linux subdirectory.
>
> 2) Looks like you
Re: 1) The file System.map is created in the /usr/src/linux subdirectory.
2) Looks like you have a hard disk that has > 1024 cylinders. Go to the
/etc subdirectory.
Edit the file lilo.conf and add the line:
lba32
to the file somewhere. (You'll need to be logged in as root, or use the su
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:21:40PM +0200, Kai Weber wrote:
> At 14:21 19.06.00, you wrote:
>
> >Better yet:
> >
> >apt-get update; apt-get install kernel-package
> >make config (or menuconfig or xconfig)
> >make-kpkg clean
> >make-kpkg --revision=local. kernel_image
> >dpkg -i ../kernel-image-_loc
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 08:02:52AM -0400, dyer wrote:
> Marc Miron wrote:
>
> > Hi Everybody!!
> >
> > I'm trying to build a new kernel that has IP masqing/port forwarding
> > abilities and I've followed all the directions in the How-TOs and I just
> > can't seem to get it to work as after runing
Marc Miron wrote:
> Hi Everybody!!
>
> I'm trying to build a new kernel that has IP masqing/port forwarding
> abilities and I've followed all the directions in the How-TOs and I just
> can't seem to get it to work as after runing make config and setting it all
> up, I run make clean;make install;
Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> Well, not knowing any better, I fixed it by uninstalling my header and
> source packages (2.0.33), reinstalling the libc6-dev package, and then
> installing bin86 and the 2.0.34 source and header packages.
>
> This left the usr/include directories (asm, linux, scsi) NOT set
On Sun, 5 Jul 1998, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> Well, not knowing any better, I fixed it by uninstalling my header and
> source packages (2.0.33), reinstalling the libc6-dev package, and then
> installing bin86 and the 2.0.34 source and header packages.
If you install the kernel-source package, you don'
Well, not knowing any better, I fixed it by uninstalling my header and
source packages (2.0.33), reinstalling the libc6-dev package, and then
installing bin86 and the 2.0.34 source and header packages.
This left the usr/include directories (asm, linux, scsi) NOT set up as
links. This is contrary t
Well, the official Debian position is to link to the 2.0.32 headers,
however it should probably also work with 2.0.3{3|4}, as I doubt that
there are any significant changes (although I haven't checked).
See /usr/doc/libc6/FAQ.Debian.gz for the details (this is somewhat
controversial, particularly
Reinhold,
Yes I did the make modules and make modules_install, but I left that out
since I didn't get far enough for that to be an issue.
There was no image file in the arch/i386/boot directory (where I was
expecting it to be), only in /usr/src/linux, which was strange, but is
likely caused by my
Bob,
Thanks. Looks like I had more than one problem here.
I take it I should reinstall the 2.0.32 kernel headers package then
also? I was confused about that and it didn't look right so I removed
it. This whole setup isn't very clear, but I think you've got me headed
in the right direction.
Tom
On Sun, 5 Jul 1998, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a fairly new Linux user, and am really starting to enjoy Linux and
> the Debian distribution. I'm running Hamm which I have downloaded and
> installed in bits and pieces with the help of dftp and dpkg. I also have
> the KDE beta4 desktop, th
On Sun, 05 Jul 1998, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm a fairly new Linux user, and am really starting to enjoy Linux and
>the Debian distribution. I'm running Hamm which I have downloaded and
>installed in bits and pieces with the help of dftp and dpkg. I also have
>the KDE beta4 desktop, the glib
> The command "as86" is missing to compile the kernel. It's not on my
> disk. Where can I find this command ?
>
> Regards,
> Marc
Dear Marc,
you have to install "bin86" package to have as86 available.
Alex Y.
--
_
_( )_
( (o___ +---+
Hi!
What Manoj wants to give you a pointer to is his grandious kernel-package.
It does an excellent job at kernel-compile (reduces the possible mistakes
enormously), please give it a try and install it along with the other
packages needed.
Marcus
On Thu, Oct 16, 1997 at 11:19:29AM -0500, Manoj
Steve Koop wrote:
>I'm compiling the kernel for the first time a having some problems,
>
>Avery thing up to the " make zImage ", it works to the end and then has some
> error msg's:
>
>
>the last few lines are:
>
>
>as86 -0 -a -o bootsect.o bootsec.s
>
>Make[1]: as86: Co
Hi,
From the kernel-package README file:
--
INSTALLATION NOTES:
Before you go any further, please allow me to point out that you need to
have a few other packages installed before you can compile your own kernels
(it is di
> I'm compiling the kernel for the first time a having some problems,
>
> Avery thing up to the " make zImage ", it works to the end and then has
> some error msg's:
>
> the last few lines are:
>
> as86 -0 -a -o bootsect.o bootsec.s
> Make[1]: as86: Command not found
> Make[1]: *** [bootsec.o]
Hi,
Here follows the readme file for kernel-package, which should
help creating your own kernel image deb package.
manoj
$Id: README,v 1.3 1997/06/25 07:33:26 srivasta Exp $
This is the Debian Linux packaging scripts for the Linux kernel.
This package has been put togethe
Hi,
>>"Bob" == Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> Install libc5-dev, which includes these files.
Bob> Also, you want to (per the README which comes with the kernel
Bob> source):
Bob> make sure your /usr/include/asm, /usr/include/linux, and
Bob> /usr/include/scsi directories are just sy
On Tue, 22 Jul 1997, Bruno O. M. Simoes wrote:
> Hello,
> I had problems while compiled the kernel.
> First I didn't have anything in my "/usr/src" directory, so I got the
> "linux-2.0.29.tar.gz" file, that's my installed version, apply "tar -xzvf"
> and got a directory tree "/usr/src/
On Fri, 11 Jul 1997 01:03:24 EDT Paul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I know how to compile the kernel the regular way, but doesn't Debian
> have a special script for this? I install it and I don't know the name
> of it... what is it?
There is a kernel-package package to compile the kernel
You should have a look at 'Kernel HOWTO'. There is there all the
answers to your questions.
This is some of the information you could find in :
-> Just so I know and have my ducks in order.
->
-> Is this the correct method for re-compiling my Kernel??
->
-> cd /usr/src/
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
, writes:
>Just so I know and have my ducks in order.
>
>Is this the correct method for re-compiling my Kernel??
>
>cd /usr/src/Linux
or /usr/src/linux or whatever
This is where the kernel source is stored, of course.
>make config
If you're running X-w
> "b" == bigt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
b> cd /usr/src/Linux
With this you go to the directory where the kernel sources are. :-)
b> make config
Here you will be asked a lot of things. Responding these questions you
are saying what you want and what you don't want in your kernel,
acording
Just so I know and have my ducks in order.
Is this the correct method for re-compiling my Kernel??
cd /usr/src/Linux
make config
make dep
make zImage
make zdisk
make zlilo
Is this correct? Can someone explain briefly each step and why I have
to do this??? I just want to understand it more.
T
Hi,
Make bzImage would place a image file under
./arch/$(architecture)/boot/$(kimage). You need to care about
bzImage, ./System.map, and ./vmlinux, which is needed for generating
the psdatabase, needed for the commands ps and friends. You also need
to care asbout the modules produced
Hi,
>>"Craig" == Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
(Thanks, Craig, for answering this) I am merely clarifying a few minor
points in an excellent tutorial, To paraphrase what Craig said:
: simplest way is to download "kernel_source-x.x.x.deb", use dpkg to
: install it, and then:
: 1. cd
Craig Sanders writes:
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I tried the procedure you (and a couple of others) suggested. I currently
> > have debian 0.93R6 installed and am trying to compile the kernel from
> > devel/source-1.3.64-0.deb
>
> You've got the wrong kernel v
Craig Sanders writes:
>
>
> On Wed, 22 May 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > This appears to contain the standard kernel release source tree but
> > has a number of additional things (such as a nifty Tcl/Tk GUI for
> > kernel configurations).
>
> "make xconfig" and "make menuconfig" are a sta
On Thu, 23 May 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The hard part is doing the initial upgrade from 0.93r6 to 1.1 -
>
> Is doing a slow upgrade from 0.93R6 to 1.1 a better idea than trying a
> clean installation of 1.1?
that depends on whether or not you've got data and config files you want
to kee
On Thu, 23 May 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I tried the procedure you (and a couple of others) suggested. I currently
> have debian 0.93R6 installed and am trying to compile the kernel from
> devel/source-1.3.64-0.deb
You've got the wrong kernel version. These instructions only apply to
On Wed, 22 May 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This appears to contain the standard kernel release source tree but
> has a number of additional things (such as a nifty Tcl/Tk GUI for
> kernel configurations).
"make xconfig" and "make menuconfig" are a standard part of the linux
kernel now...has
46 matches
Mail list logo
