Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Sun, 29 May 2011 10:26:25 -0400, Dan wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Camaleón wrote: >> On Wed, 25 May 2011 20:41:05 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: >> >>> On Mi, 25 mai 11, 16:00:07, Camaleón wrote: And it's not me who thinks that way, but Mozilla who tagged it so. >>> >>> And why

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Camaleón wrote: > On Wed, 25 May 2011 20:41:05 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > >> On Mi, 25 mai 11, 16:00:07, Camaleón wrote: >>> And it's not me who thinks that way, but Mozilla who tagged it so. >> >> And why should we care (as long as we still get security suppor

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On 05/25/2011 06:28 AM, Perry Thompson wrote: [snip] I still think that this should be possible. I mean, Chrome 11 works from chrome.google.com, why shouldn't Chromium work? Deep, internal, slight library dependencies. End-user packages are built against certain specific versions of librarie

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:39:03PM -0400, Perry Thompson wrote: > I have been looking for an operating system that would allow me to have > the latest browser, but the stability of Debian Stable, and I realized > that I just want to keep using Debian. I have looked into apt-pinning to > install Chr

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Wed, 25 May 2011 20:41:05 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Mi, 25 mai 11, 16:00:07, Camaleón wrote: >> And it's not me who thinks that way, but Mozilla who tagged it so. > > And why should we care (as long as we still get security support, even > if it's only from Debian). Anyone who estimat

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Mi, 25 mai 11, 16:00:07, Camaleón wrote: > And it's not me who thinks that way, but Mozilla who tagged it so. And why should we care (as long as we still get security support, even if it's only from Debian). Some friends of mine (web developers) complain there are still a lot of users with I

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Wed, 25 May 2011 10:40:48 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In , Camaleón wrote: >>On Wed, 25 May 2011 09:21:24 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >>> In , Camaleón wrote: On Wed, 25 May 2011 08:50:56 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > "Obsolete" isn't the right term. >>

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

In , Camaleón wrote: >On Wed, 25 May 2011 09:21:24 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> In , Camaleón wrote: >>>On Wed, 25 May 2011 08:50:56 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: "Obsolete" isn't the right term. >>> >>>How would you call the Firefox 3.0.x branch? Legacy? >>> >> I'd call 3.0.

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

In , Camaleón wrote: >- Do web sites force me to use an updated version of the applications >(plugins, web browser capabilities...)? Yes, they do. And I can't avoid >that if I want to use those sites and have a "normal life" in the web. Odd, I have my "normal life" on the web without having to go

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Wed, 25 May 2011 09:21:24 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In , Camaleón wrote: >>On Wed, 25 May 2011 08:50:56 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >>> In , Camaleón wrote: Today's browsers upgrade to a new version in just two months (!) and you are left with an obsolete packa

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On 2011-05-25, Camaleón wrote: [snip] > browsers upgrade to a new version in just two months (!) and you are left > with an obsolete package for several years. I'm now seriously considering > using the upstream packages for the major browsers because of their new > agressive update policy t

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

In , Camaleón wrote: >On Wed, 25 May 2011 08:50:56 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> In , Camaleón wrote: >>>Today's >>>browsers upgrade to a new version in just two months (!) and you are >>>left with an obsolete package for several years. >>> >> "Obsolete" isn't the right term. > >How would

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Wed, 25 May 2011 08:50:56 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In , Camaleón wrote: >>Today's >>browsers upgrade to a new version in just two months (!) and you are >>left with an obsolete package for several years. > > "Obsolete" isn't the right term. How would you call the Firefox 3.0.x b

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

In , Camaleón wrote: >Today's >browsers upgrade to a new version in just two months (!) and you are left >with an obsolete package for several years. "Obsolete" isn't the right term. I continued to use Lenny's Iceweasel and Chromium until about a month be

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Qua, 25 Mai 2011, Perry Thompson wrote: I still think that this should be possible. I mean, Chrome 11 works from chrome.google.com, why shouldn't Chromium work? They're pretty much the same thing, no? Surely there must be some way of doing this. It might be statically linked, or it might be

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Tue, 24 May 2011 23:39:03 -0400, Perry Thompson wrote: > I have been looking for an operating system that would allow me to have > the latest browser, but the stability of Debian Stable, and I realized > that I just want to keep using Debian. I have looked into apt-pinning to > install Chromium

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Wed, 25 May 2011 07:28:09 -0400, Perry Thompson wrote: > On 05/25/2011 01:33 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: >> On Mi, 25 mai 11, 00:21:36, Perry Thompson wrote: (...) >>> "sudo aptitude -t sid install chromium" shows me... >>> http://pastebin.com/6rFGizCA >>> >>> "sudo aptitude install chromium/si

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On 05/25/2011 01:33 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Mi, 25 mai 11, 00:21:36, Perry Thompson wrote: >> On 05/24/2011 11:41 PM, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: >>> 2011/5/25 Perry Thompson >>> I have been looking for an operating system that would allow me to have the latest browser, but the stabil

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On Mi, 25 mai 11, 00:21:36, Perry Thompson wrote: > On 05/24/2011 11:41 PM, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > > 2011/5/25 Perry Thompson > > > >> I have been looking for an operating system that would allow me to have > >> the latest browser, but the stability of Debian Stable, and I realized > >> that I

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

On 05/24/2011 11:41 PM, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > 2011/5/25 Perry Thompson > >> I have been looking for an operating system that would allow me to have >> the latest browser, but the stability of Debian Stable, and I realized >> that I just want to keep using Debian. I have looked into apt-pinnin

Re: Chromium 11 on Debian 6.0.1 Stable

2011/5/25 Perry Thompson > I have been looking for an operating system that would allow me to have > the latest browser, but the stability of Debian Stable, and I realized > that I just want to keep using Debian. I have looked into apt-pinning to > install Chromium 11 from Sid, however it has not