On Jo, 23 aug 12, 09:14:18, Mike McClain wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:13:52AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > You can always subscribe to the relevant bug (too lazy to look up the
> > number for you).
>
> Educate me please, how do you subscribe to a bug?
http://www.de
Hi Andrei,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:13:52AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> You can always subscribe to the relevant bug (too lazy to look up the
> number for you).
Educate me please, how do you subscribe to a bug?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Satisfied user of Linux since 1997.
O< ascii ribbon campaign
On 08/22/2012 02:16 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Gary Roach wrote:
OK, OK
I'm convinced. I'll stay with the normal list.
:-)
I just needed to get used to the difference.
I am so very used to seeing threaded message discussions that not
having those would drive me crazy.
I
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:16:01PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> I have come to the conclusion that humans are intrinsically bad at
> communication. Apparently it isn't common sense. Apparently it does
> actually require the person to put some effort into learning how to
> interact with others.
On Mi, 22 aug 12, 15:16:01, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> For me it means that I need to verify that I got the message by the
> mailing list too (which always comes later so I usually ignore it for
> a while first) and that it wasn't a reply only to me. So I can't just
> ignore them. I have to spend eff
On Jo, 23 aug 12, 00:46:41, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> I would like to use digest too, if digest isn't broken anymore, please
> inform me. If I should reply using a digest and something is technical
> broken (not regarding to the content of my idiotic messages ;), then
> inform me too.
You can alway
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 15:16 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I hope that this is the correct way to reply. I don't want to
> > clutter up Ralf's normal in box with debian messages.
>
> It looks okay to me. I see no fault with it.
Absolutely ok for me! No fault for me either. Some list members take
c
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 15:04 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Mike McClain wrote:
> > Since the digest is broken and the maintainer wouldn't even answer my
> > messages I no longer subscribe but will go back to it when I hear it's
> > fixed.
>
> Even though I campaign against digests I think it is la
Gary Roach wrote:
> OK, OK
> I'm convinced. I'll stay with the normal list.
:-)
> I just needed to get used to the difference.
I am so very used to seeing threaded message discussions that not
having those would drive me crazy.
> I quit the digest because it broke for me.
> This form takes a li
Mike McClain wrote:
> Since the digest is broken and the maintainer wouldn't even answer my
> messages I no longer subscribe but will go back to it when I hear it's
> fixed.
Even though I campaign against digests I think it is lamentable that
it is broken. I know there have been attempts to r
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:59:58PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Mike McClain wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > People using digests usually don't know how to reply using them and
> > > cause a lot of problems. Please don't be the source of problems.
> > > Using a digested mailing list is hard! You
On 08/21/2012 11:26 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 13:51 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
Gary Roach wrote:
I'm presently using the standard form of this mailing list and wish to
change to the digest form.
If you want to post replies, I woul
People accustomed to a GUI can use Evolution. It's possible to reply to
the individual mails inside Debian's digest. Mailman's digest is another
issue, not relevant for this list.
Regards,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 13:51 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > Gary Roach wrote:
> > > I'm presently using the standard form of this mailing list and wish to
> > > change to the digest form.
> >
> > If you want to post replies, I wouldn't do it :-/
>
> Agreed strongly! Please do not
Mike McClain wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > People using digests usually don't know how to reply using them and
> > cause a lot of problems. Please don't be the source of problems.
> > Using a digested mailing list is hard! You need special tools in
> > order to burst the digest to read and reply
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:51:27PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> People using digests usually don't know how to reply using them and
> cause a lot of problems. Please don't be the source of problems.
> Using a digested mailing list is hard! You need special tools in
> order to burst the digest
Camaleón wrote:
> Gary Roach wrote:
> > I'm presently using the standard form of this mailing list and wish to
> > change to the digest form.
>
> If you want to post replies, I wouldn't do it :-/
Agreed strongly! Please do not post replies from a digest.
> > Can I just re-subscribe to the dige
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:39:04 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> I'm presently using the standard form of this mailing list and wish to
> change to the digest form.
If you want to post replies, I wouldn't do it :-/
> Can I just re-subscribe to the digest form or do I have to unsubscribe
> from the stand
18 matches
Mail list logo
