Re: Changing process priority

2003-02-27 Thread Ronald Castillo
I created a new KDE System Guard link that runs as root so I could change the priority to whatever I want it to. Works very well! Ronald On Thursday 27 February 2003 04:46, Seneca wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:30:26PM +, Rodrigo Sobrinho wrote: > > well, when I logged at non super-use

Re: Changing process priority

2003-02-26 Thread Seneca
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:30:26PM +, Rodrigo Sobrinho wrote: > well, when I logged at non super-user, I can not alter the priority of > my process to negative number. Deny permission for me > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ nice -n -1 kedit > nice: n?o consigo alterar prioridade: Permiss?o negada > >

Re: Changing process priority

2003-02-26 Thread Rodrigo Sobrinho
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 09:29:51 +0100 Ronald Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks a lot for all your help! Now that you mentioned that "nice" > works for that, I found a way to change the priority while the process > is running, in KDE system Guard. Just right click int he process name > an

Re: Changing process priority

2003-02-22 Thread Ronald Castillo
Thanks a lot for all your help! Now that you mentioned that "nice" works for that, I found a way to change the priority while the process is running, in KDE system Guard. Just right click int he process name and clic on "renice process". Regards, Ronald On Saturday 22 February 2003 05:07, N

Re: Changing process priority

2003-02-21 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:49:14PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote: > Nathan E Norman wrote: > > > Er, I think you'd want to use "nice --20" or "nice -n -20" or even ^^^ > > "nice --adjustment=-20"; "nice -20" implies a nice level ov positive >

Re: Changing process priority

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Heironimus
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:49:14PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote: > Nathan E Norman wrote: > > > Er, I think you'd want to use "nice --20" or "nice -n -20" or even > > "nice --adjustment=-20"; "nice -20" implies a nice level ov positive > > twenty whic is invalid; the highest numer (and lowest priori

Re: Changing process priority

2003-02-21 Thread Craig Dickson
Nathan E Norman wrote: > Er, I think you'd want to use "nice --20" or "nice -n -20" or even > "nice --adjustment=-20"; "nice -20" implies a nice level ov positive > twenty whic is invalid; the highest numer (and lowest priority) > accepted is 19. Ought to be "nice -n -20" actually; "nice --20" is

Re: Changing process priority

2003-02-21 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:59:31PM -0600, Michael Heironimus wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 08:23:41PM +0100, Ronald Castillo wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone could please tell me how to change the priority for > > a process. Actually what I want to do is give more (most) processor priority

Re: Changing process priority

2003-02-21 Thread Michael Heironimus
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 08:23:41PM +0100, Ronald Castillo wrote: > I was wondering if anyone could please tell me how to change the priority for > a process. Actually what I want to do is give more (most) processor priority > to ffmpeg when encoding videos. Read the man page on "nice". If you w