Incoming from Tim Connors:
> "Linux Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:27:14 -0400:
> >
> > Sorry top poster for life, not scrolling all the way to the bottom to =
> > get a
> > reply I know what the previous email said and don=92t need to read it =
> > again.
>
> I admire that
"Linux Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:27:14 -0400:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> --=_NextPart_000__01C4287E.4AEC3180
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Sorry top poster for
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:11:02 -0700:
> diego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > El jue, 22-04-2004 a las 08:52, Paul Johnson escribi=F3:
> >> DO NOT USE XHOST! xhost is considered harmful, use google for a few
> >> trillion reasons why. Just use ssh -C -X to get
"Linux Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry top poster for life, not scrolling all the way to the bottom to get a
> reply I know what the previous email said and donʼt need to read it again.
You're supposed to trim your quoting, not quote the entire email. Cut
for context. Don't just turn
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:27:14 -0400
"Linux Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry top poster for life, not scrolling all the way to the bottom to
get a reply I know what the previous email said and don_t need to read
it again.
Yes, but it completely discourages *anyone*
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 03:27:14PM -0400, Linux Nick wrote:
> Sorry top poster for life, not scrolling all the way to the bottom to get a
> reply I know what the previous email said and dont need to read it again.
>
I tend to agree with you. Sometimes, when the thread is long and
known, there i
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:27:14 -0400
"Linux Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry top poster for life, not scrolling all the way to the bottom to
> get a reply I know what the previous email said and don_t need to read
> it again.
Yes, but it completely discourages *anyone* from jumping in late
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 03:27:14PM -0400, Linux Nick wrote:
>
> [-- Autoview using /usr/bin/lynx -dump -force_html ''/tmp/mutt.html'' --]
>
>Sorry top poster for life, not scrolling all the way to the bottom to
>get a reply I know what the previous email said and don't need to read
>it
t;
To: diego
>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject: Re: Cannot launch remote apps on X
>
>
English is read from top down with the flow of context, not newest
>
information on top.
Please learn to quote accordingly.
>
http://learn.to/quote
>
http://ursine.ca/jargon/html/e
El jue, 22-04-2004 a las 20:11, Paul Johnson escribió:
> English is read from top down with the flow of context, not newest
> information on top. Please learn to quote accordingly.
> http://learn.to/quote
> http://ursine.ca/jargon/html/email-style.html
>
> You sent a private-mail reply to my atte
English is read from top down with the flow of context, not newest
information on top. Please learn to quote accordingly.
http://learn.to/quote
http://ursine.ca/jargon/html/email-style.html
You sent a private-mail reply to my attempt to help you on a mailing
list, and failed to mention having don
Yes there it is.
What is more strange is that even from the culprit machine it doesn't
work:
I do a ifconfig and it says 172.16.10.1 is one of its network interfaces
(no firewall active) so if I do:
export DISPLAY=:0 . ==> It shows up the window
export DISPLAY=172.16.10.1:0 ==> Complaints
Already changed. No luck this way...
Thanks for the hint anyway.
El jue, 22-04-2004 a las 07:45, George Cristian Birzan escribió:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:32:48PM +0200, diego wrote:
> > Hello, I have a knoppix just installed and network configured with a
> > fixed IP (lets say 172.16.10.1) a
diego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, I have a knoppix just installed and network configured with a
> fixed IP (lets say 172.16.10.1) and working right. The problem is that
> if I do:
>
> 1) export DISPLAY=:0; xclock ==> It works
>
> 2) export DISPLAY=172.16.10.1; xclock ==> It cannot conn
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:32:48PM +0200, diego wrote:
> Hello, I have a knoppix just installed and network configured with a
> fixed IP (lets say 172.16.10.1) and working right. The problem is that
> if I do:
>
> 1) export DISPLAY=:0; xclock ==> It works
>
> 2) export DISPLAY=172.16.10.1; xclo
Incoming from diego:
>
> El mié, 21-04-2004 a las 23:55, Monique Y. Mudama escribió:
> > On 2004-04-21, diego penned:
> > > Hello, I have a knoppix just installed and network configured with a
> > > fixed IP (lets say 172.16.10.1) and working right. The problem is that
> > > if I do:
> > >
> > > 1
Yes... sorry I made a typo, I meant:
...
export DISPLAY=172.16.10.1:0; xclock ==> It cannot connect to X
...
Anyway, thanks for pointing it out just in case...
El mié, 21-04-2004 a las 23:55, Monique Y. Mudama escribió:
> On 2004-04-21, diego penned:
> > Hello, I have a knoppix just installed
On 2004-04-21, diego penned:
> Hello, I have a knoppix just installed and network configured with a
> fixed IP (lets say 172.16.10.1) and working right. The problem is that
> if I do:
>
> 1) export DISPLAY=:0; xclock ==> It works
>
> 2) export DISPLAY=172.16.10.1; xclock ==> It cannot connect to
18 matches
Mail list logo
