Florian Kulzer writes:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:51:12 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
>> Florian Kulzer writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> > If you want to search for utilities with generic names then it helps to
>> > use apt-file like this:
>> >
>> > apt-file search "bin/ip" | grep '/ip$'
>>
>> I use dialup
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:51:12 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
> Florian Kulzer writes:
[...]
> > If you want to search for utilities with generic names then it helps to
> > use apt-file like this:
> >
> > apt-file search "bin/ip" | grep '/ip$'
>
> I use dialup so I've never been willing to downloa
Florian Kulzer writes:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:41:02 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
>> Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
>> in? I tried 'apt-cache search ip network', but it returns hundreds of
>> matching packages.
>
> The package is called "iproute".
Thank
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 08:42:26PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Lisi Reisz:
> > On Thursday 26 March 2009 16:41:02 Carl Johnson wrote:
> >> Alex Samad writes:
> >>
> >> Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
> >> in?
> >
> > I've got it in Bash. Are you sure tha
Lisi Reisz:
> On Thursday 26 March 2009 16:41:02 Carl Johnson wrote:
>> Alex Samad writes:
>>
>> Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
>> in?
>
> I've got it in Bash. Are you sure that you have not? Have you tried it?
It is not "in bash". Bash includes just
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:41:02 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
> Alex Samad writes:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:13:18PM +0530, Kousik Maiti wrote:
> > can you show us
> >
> > ip r
> > ifconfig
> > ip a
> > ip li
> > ip rule
>
> Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
On Thursday 26 March 2009 16:41:02 Carl Johnson wrote:
> Alex Samad writes:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:13:18PM +0530, Kousik Maiti wrote:
> > can you show us
> >
> > ip r
> > ifconfig
> > ip a
> > ip li
> > ip rule
>
> Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
> in?
In <873ad0i6e9@cjlinux.localnet>, Carl Johnson wrote:
>Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
>in?
iproute
Some other distributions call the same package "iproute2".
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net
Alex Samad writes:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:13:18PM +0530, Kousik Maiti wrote:
> can you show us
>
> ip r
> ifconfig
> ip a
> ip li
> ip rule
Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
in? I tried 'apt-cache search ip network', but it returns hundreds of
matching
On Thursday 26 March 2009 05:44:30 Kousik Maiti wrote:
>As eth0 is not working I down it and up the eth1.These are the output you
>want. Actually its a public IP address thats why it replaced it with XXX...
That's not going to help us. We need that output while your networking is in
the state yo
As eth0 is not working I down it and up the eth1.These are the output you
want. Actually its a public IP address thats why it replaced it with XXX...
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Alex Samad wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:13:18PM +0530, Kousik Maiti wrote:
> > Both are connected with Net
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Thorny wrote:
> Please don't top post. I have rewritten this to conform to suggested list
> standard and replied at bottom.
>
> Kousik Maiti:
> > In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine
> > via eth0 but eth1 is working fine. My ethe
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:13:18PM +0530, Kousik Maiti wrote:
> Both are connected with Net.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
>
> > Kousik Maiti wrote:
> >
> >> In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine
> >> via eth0 but eth1 is working fine.
Please don't top post. I have rewritten this to conform to suggested list
standard and replied at bottom.
Kousik Maiti:
> In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine
> via eth0 but eth1 is working fine. My ethernat controller is Ethernet
> controller: Broadcom Corporati
Both are connected with Net.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Kousik Maiti wrote:
>
>> In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine
>> via eth0 but eth1 is working fine. My ethernat controller is
>> Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtr
Kousik Maiti wrote:
In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine
via eth0 but eth1 is working fine. My ethernat controller is
Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit
Ethernet (rev 12) It is the output from lspci . Can anybody help???
Th
In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine via
eth0 but eth1 is working fine. My ethernat controller is
Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit
Ethernet (rev 12) It is the output from lspci . Can anybody help???
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 08:01:33AM +0100, Martin wrote:
> I'd try to:
>
> $ ip a ls
thats interesting I have used ls for a while and never come across ls
option - its not in ip a help either cool
> # make sure you have the expected values, if not fix /etc/network/interfaces
> $ ip route ls
> $ p
I'd try to:
$ ip a ls
# make sure you have the expected values, if not fix /etc/network/interfaces
$ ip route ls
$ ping $ip_of_default_gateway
If that works your problem is on your router.
/Martin
2009/3/23 Kousik Maiti :
> I can't ping to other ip address as it complains"destination host
> unr
Helge Stenström (KI/EAB) wrote:
From: W Paul Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 7 augusti 2006 16:22
Subject: Re: Can't ping
Helge Stenstrom wrote:
Response from `route -n` on my trouble machine (Debian Sid,
IP=147.214.195.137):
localhost:/mnt/hda9/helge# route -n
Kern
Helge Stenström (KI/EAB) wrote:
From: W Paul Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 7 augusti 2006 16:22
Subject: Re: Can't ping
Helge Stenstrom wrote:
Response from `route -n` on my trouble machine (Debian Sid,
IP=147.214.195.137):
localhost:/mnt/hda9/helge# route -n
Kern
> From: W Paul Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 7 augusti 2006 16:22
> Subject: Re: Can't ping
> Helge Stenstrom wrote:
> > Response from `route -n` on my trouble machine (Debian Sid,
>> IP=147.214.195.137):
> > localhost:/mnt/hda9/helge# rou
Helge Stenstrom wrote:
I can't ping nodes outside my subnet. I can reach the internet by hopping via
another machine on the subnet, which makes it possible to write this e-mail.
Is there a config file I should check carefully? Things broke when I upgraded my
Debian Sid in late July, with the p
I can't ping nodes outside my subnet. I can reach the internet by hopping via
another machine on the subnet, which makes it possible to write this e-mail.
Is there a config file I should check carefully? Things broke when I upgraded
my
Debian Sid in late July, with the previous successful upgra
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 14:38 +0200, Helge Stenström (KI/EAB) wrote:
> I can't ping either. I have Debian Sid, and made a system upgrade in late
> July. Is the cause the same?
>
> pinging other machines on the same subnet works.
>
> The route command takes very long time (40 seconds), but gives th
On fre, 2006-08-04 at 14:38 +0200, Helge Stenström (KI/EAB) wrote:
> I can't ping either. I have Debian Sid, and made a system upgrade in late
> July. Is the cause the same?
>
> pinging other machines on the same subnet works.
>
> The route command takes very long time (40 seconds), but gives th
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 16:40 +0200, Helge Stenström (KI/EAB) wrote:
> I can ping by IP machines on the same subnet (or at least
> attached to the same switch on my desk). I can't ping other
> machines, such as 66.249.93.99 (www.google.com)
> or 147.214.214.11 (one of my nameservers)
>
> [EMAIL PR
I can ping by IP machines on the same subnet (or at least
attached to the same switch on my desk). I can't ping other
machines, such as 66.249.93.99 (www.google.com)
or 147.214.214.11 (one of my nameservers)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] helped me understand that `route` is slow because
there is no response
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:38:33PM +0200, Helge Stenstr?m (KI/EAB) wrote:
> I can't ping either. I have Debian Sid, and made a system upgrade in late
> July. Is the cause the same?
>
> pinging other machines on the same subnet works.
>
> The route command takes very long time (40 seconds), but g
I can't ping either. I have Debian Sid, and made a system upgrade in late July.
Is the cause the same?
pinging other machines on the same subnet works.
The route command takes very long time (40 seconds), but gives the expected
result. (disclaimer: I don't understand this stuff, but I can compa
> > check the route tables too
>
> route -n:
> 84.60.0.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 ppp0
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 00 eth0
> 0.0.0.0
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:51:32PM +0200, Christian Christmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> after an update of my Etch system yesterday, I can't connect to the
>> internet
>> properly via my DSL connection.
>>
>> After running pppoeconf
"Pol Hallen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Any ideas what's wrong and how to solve this problem?
> try to ping a numeric ip (google.com has address 64.233.167.99)
No, pinging IP's does not work either.
>
> check the route tables too
route -n:
84.60.0.1
> Any ideas what's wrong and how to solve this problem?
try to ping a numeric ip (google.com has address 64.233.167.99)
check the route tables too
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:51:32PM +0200, Christian Christmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after an update of my Etch system yesterday, I can't connect to the internet
> properly via my DSL connection.
>
> After running pppoeconf and entering my user data and password and
> then connect to my provider with
>---
> "Antony Gelberg" wrote:
>
>>Can you post iptables -L just after a ping fails?
I'll post my iptables script here.
I've been debugging it and i think there might be some
problems:
1. I'm not sure about this rule in inet_in
$IPT -A inet_in -p tcp
---
"Antony Gelberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i have a Debian (testing) machine as a firewall (named arthur) with 2
>> nics, eth0 that is connected to the internet and gets an ip of the ISP
>> via DHCP and eth1
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have a Debian (testing) machine as a firewall (named arthur) with 2
> nics, eth0 that is connected to the internet and gets an ip of the ISP
> via DHCP and eth1 which serves ip's for the lan and has ip
> 192.168.0.1. Currently there is only 1 other pc (named la
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vikki Roemer) writes:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 05:21:37PM +0200, Nicos Gollan wrote:
>> On Sunday 06 July 2003 16:57, Vikki Roemer wrote:
>> > Hi
>> > I'm trying to set up IP masquerading. I had it set up under a previous
>> > install, but I can't get it going now. The proble
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 05:21:37PM +0200, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> On Sunday 06 July 2003 16:57, Vikki Roemer wrote:
> > Hi
> > I'm trying to set up IP masquerading. I had it set up under a previous
> > install, but I can't get it going now. The problem seems to be related to
> > the fact that I can
On Sunday 06 July 2003 16:57, Vikki Roemer wrote:
> Hi
> I'm trying to set up IP masquerading. I had it set up under a previous
> install, but I can't get it going now. The problem seems to be related to
> the fact that I can't ping the other computer on the LAN, the one that's
> going to be behi
on Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Martin Edward John Waller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have win95PC (yuck - sorry.) (192.168.201.2) and
> a woody debian box. (192.168.201.1). Trouble is,
> even though the ethernet cards are up OK I can't
> communicate between them (ping, anything, using
> nume
On Monday 25 February 2002 04:44 pm, dman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:04:30PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> | On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:54:26 -0800 (PST) John Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> | > i use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subsribe to this list but was told i
> | > need approval from modulator.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:04:30PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
| On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:54:26 -0800 (PST) John Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > i use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subsribe to this list but was told i
| > need approval from modulator.
|
| An amplitude modulator, or a frequency modulator?
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:54:26 -0800 (PST) John Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i can use mail from pop.citiz.net in Windows
> but can't use it in Debian 2.2 and can't ping it.
>
> i use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subsribe to this list but
> was told i need approval from modulator.
An amplitude modulat
The isp was making changes-- problem resolved.
Maybe your default gateway has not been set.
try
route add default gw my.router.host.name
J.
-Original Message-
From: p [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:49 PM
To: debs
Subject: can't ping isp
debs,
i can ping my lan and router, but i can't get
out (from the
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 08:19:38AM -0700, Kirk Schroeder wrote:
> I have a Debian box that I can not ping my SuSE box. Is there something in
> Debian that I am missing?
do you have the driver for your network-card loaded?
do you have configured the interface correctly? (man ifup, interfaces, ...
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 08:19:38AM -0700, Kirk Schroeder wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a Debian box that I can not ping my SuSE box. Is there something in
> Debian that I am
> missing? I have no problem setting up the SuSE boxes and networking them,
> but I really want
> to convert to Debian. I am a
49 matches
Mail list logo
