On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 11:26, "Bob Proulx" said:
> It might be fruitful to open a question about parted on their upstream
> mailing list.
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/
>
> Bob
Hi Bob,
I did as you suggested, and it was h
On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 11:26, "Bob Proulx" said:
> cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
>> I just find it frustrating that the partitioner would issue
>> a warning that has so little supporting documentation.
>
> It might be fruitful to open a question about parted on their upstream
> mailing list.
>
> h
cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
> I just find it frustrating that the partitioner would issue
> a warning that has so little supporting documentation.
It might be fruitful to open a question about parted on their upstream
mailing list.
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
http://www.gnu.o
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 19:50, "Bob Proulx" said:
> cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
>> cr...@gtek.biz said:
>> I found a thread that mentioned the values should be multiples of
>> 2048 for advanced format disks, which this ST31000524AS is, if I'm
>
> The ST31000524AS is not advanced format. It uses tra
cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
> cr...@gtek.biz said:
> I found a thread that mentioned the values should be multiples of
> 2048 for advanced format disks, which this ST31000524AS is, if I'm
The ST31000524AS is not advanced format. It uses traditional 512 byte
sectors. I have several of that particular m
On Monday, May 6, 2013 08:39, cr...@gtek.biz said:
> This 1TB disk reports both physical and logical sector sizes of 512 bytes
> each,
> and is currently partitioned with one extended partition that is made up of
> the
> entire disk. It has three existing logical partitions, and parted tells me
6 matches
Mail list logo
