On 10/21/2010 3:46 PM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 14:28 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/14/2010 01:52 PM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
Hi list!
I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if they are the r
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 14:28 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 01:52 PM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
> > Hi list!
> >
> > I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
> > their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if they are the right
> > tools to test modern CPU
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 02:25 +, T o n g wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:32:51 +0200, godo wrote:
>
> >> PS: I'll be a while with this, but once it's done, if someone is
> >> interested in getting the results, just let me know.
> >>
> > I'm interested! :-)
>
> Me 2.
I'll got them for the next
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:32:51 +0200, godo wrote:
>> PS: I'll be a while with this, but once it's done, if someone is
>> interested in getting the results, just let me know.
>>
> I'm interested! :-)
Me 2.
--
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/
http://xpt
On 10/15/2010 05:15 PM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 10:52 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if they are the right
tools to test modern CPU chips.
Any suggestio
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 10:52 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
> > their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if they are the right
> > tools to test modern CPU chips.
>
> > Any suggestions?
>
> Hard to tell without more
> I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
> their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if they are the right
> tools to test modern CPU chips.
> Any suggestions?
Hard to tell without more data: what kinds of test do you want? What do
you want to measure and
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 20:28 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > The only problem with old code is that it might not compile with modern
> > GCC.
>
> This is minor. The bigger problem with benchmark code from the mid 90s
> is that all the floating point code targets the 80 bit x87 FPU and IEEE
> 754
Ron Johnson put forth on 10/14/2010 2:28 PM:
> On 10/14/2010 01:52 PM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
>> Hi list!
>>
>> I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
>> their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if they are the right
>> tools to test modern CPU chips.
>>
>
On 10/14/2010 03:36 PM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 14:28 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/14/2010 01:52 PM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
Hi list!
I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if they are the
Martin Spinassi:
>
> How do you do your CPU benchmarks test?
Generally, I don't. :) But what I find interesting when comparing CPUs
is the speed of video encoding (h.264).
J.
--
Tony Blair is a hypnotised self-seeking scarecrow just like all the
rest.
[Agree] [Disagree]
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 14:28 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 01:52 PM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
> > Hi list!
> >
> > I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
> > their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if they are the right
> > tools to test modern CPU
On 10/14/2010 01:52 PM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
Hi list!
I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if they are the right
tools to test modern CPU chips.
The only problem with old code is that it might not compile wi
13 matches
Mail list logo