kuLa wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > It would be great if you would say why you would want different
> > versions in the same distribution track? I am sure it is useful but I
> > can't think of why at this moment. So I haven't ever thought of that
> > as a limitation but rather a feature.
>
> wel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/10/11 01:21, Bob Proulx wrote:
sic
> You can have multiple versions in reprepro just fine. I keep many
> versions there.
>
> It would be great if you would say why you would want different
> versions in the same distribution track? I am sure
kuLa wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Dave Higgins wrote:
> >> This should be a rather simple task, to build a repository for a
> >> specific installation requirement.
> >
> > I believe the currently in vogue tool is reprepro. Here is a somewhat
> > dated but still reasonable howto for using it.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/10/11 19:08, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Dave Higgins wrote:
>> apt-mirror will mirror mirror 60GBs for stable. I don't need 60GBs.
>> I only need the few packages to get a minimal install.
>>
>> ftparchive sort of works.
>>
>> This should be a rather s
Dave Higgins wrote:
> apt-mirror will mirror mirror 60GBs for stable. I don't need 60GBs.
> I only need the few packages to get a minimal install.
>
> ftparchive sort of works.
>
> This should be a rather simple task, to build a repository for a
> specific installation requirement.
I believe the
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:02:25 -0600
Dave Higgins wrote:
> I'm getting really annoyed with Google (or is that Debian for the lack
> of documentation?).
>
> I'm trying to build a repository to build a Debian based image, based
> off a minimal squeeze (or stable) installation, the net install with
6 matches
Mail list logo
