Re: Bug #961990

2020-07-20 Thread Michael Lange
Hi, On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 18:47:37 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: > Looking at it, I don't see anything which strikes me as qualifying as > buggy. Can you clarify what about it you see as being a misbehavior > problem? > (...) > It appears that the software previously provided in libgcc1 is now being

Re: Bug #961990

2020-07-19 Thread The Wanderer
On 2020-07-19 at 18:14, Default User wrote: > On 2020-07-19 at 16:27, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >>> This has been going on since the beginning of June, 2020, with >>> no end in sight. >>> Bug #961990 - IIUC, no activity since 2020-06-02. >>> >> You show a session where you reject all the proposed s

Re: Bug #961990

2020-07-19 Thread Default User
On 2020-07-19 at 16:27, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> This has been going on since the beginning of June, 2020, with no end in >> sight. >> Bug #961990 - IIUC, no activity since 2020-06-02. >> > You show a session where you reject all the proposed solutions, but > I don't see any justification why you

Re: Bug #961990

2020-07-19 Thread The Wanderer
On 2020-07-19 at 16:27, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> This has been going on since the beginning of June, 2020, with no end in >> sight. >> Bug #961990 - IIUC, no activity since 2020-06-02. > > You show a session where you reject all the proposed solutions, but > I don't see any justification why you

Re: Bug #961990

2020-07-19 Thread Stefan Monnier
> This has been going on since the beginning of June, 2020, with no end in > sight. > Bug #961990 - IIUC, no activity since 2020-06-02. You show a session where you reject all the proposed solutions, but I don't see any justification why you reject those choices, so I don't know what you consider