On 09/10/2014 05:23 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 07:36:15 Lisi Reisz wrote:
Sorry, Ethan. Repostingto list.
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 04:22:09 Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
FYI I tried to set the orientation from the printer setup.
It's not part of the printer set-up.
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 07:36:15 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Sorry, Ethan. Repostingto list.
>
> On Wednesday 10 September 2014 04:22:09 Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> > FYI I tried to set the orientation from the printer setup.
>
> It's not part of the printer set-up. The printer should be able to do
>
On Tue 09 Sep 2014 at 23:22:09 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> From the command line -
>
> lpr -o portrait -o cpi=17 -P POS58 /var/www/receipt.txt
Glad you now have printing to your satisfaction, but the "-o portrait"
option is bothering because neither the manual page for lp (which has
the sa
Sorry, Ethan. Repostingto list.
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 04:22:09 Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> FYI I tried to set the orientation from the printer setup.
It's not part of the printer set-up. The printer should be able to do both.
It is part of the application set-up.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCR
On 09/09/2014 06:38 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:23:02AM -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
On 09/09/2014 02:47 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:46:28PM -0400, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
The printing is along the length of the paper, as opposed to perp
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:23:02AM -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 02:47 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:46:28PM -0400, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
> >>The printing is along the length of the paper, as opposed to perpendicular.
> >
> >Known as landscape and po
On Tue 09 Sep 2014 at 18:54:37 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2014 18:28:33 Brian wrote:
> > But let us not lose sight of the fact that the OP's
> > problem has nothing to do with that and a solution has already been
> > indicated by Chris Bannister.
>
> Unfortunately, it is a
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 18:28:33 Brian wrote:
> But let us not lose sight of the fact that the OP's
> problem has nothing to do with that and a solution has already been
> indicated by Chris Bannister.
Unfortunately, it is a solution which the OP, for whatever reason, either does
not underst
On Tue 09 Sep 2014 at 19:16:57 +0200, B wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:12:12 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
> > For a blank sheet of paper Plus90 or Minus90 don't matter. For a blank
> > sheet of paper with a letterhead or hole-punches it is significant.
>
> Shall we assume that the regular rotatio
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:12:12 +0100
Brian wrote:
> For a blank sheet of paper Plus90 or Minus90 don't matter. For a blank
> sheet of paper with a letterhead or hole-punches it is significant.
Shall we assume that the regular rotation is used? (that is:
Plus = counterclockwise).
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Tue 09 Sep 2014 at 17:55:26 +0200, B wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:44:34 +0200
> Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>
> > In PPD there is:
> > *LandscapeOrientation: Plus90
> >
> > Could that be it?
>
> Nope, I've the same in the PPD of my HP2100.
It provides a hint about which way the page sh
On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:44:34 +0200
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> In PPD there is:
> *LandscapeOrientation: Plus90
>
> Could that be it?
Nope, I've the same in the PPD of my HP2100.
Your PB might be related to a former order that switched to
landscape (some printers save this in a non-volatile mem
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 16:03:06 Brian wrote:
> On Tue 09 Sep 2014 at 09:23:02 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> > On 09/09/2014 02:47 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > >On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:46:28PM -0400, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
> > >>The printing is along the length of the paper, as opp
On Tue 09 Sep 2014 at 09:23:02 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 02:47 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:46:28PM -0400, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
> >>The printing is along the length of the paper, as opposed to perpendicular.
> >
> >Known as landscape and portr
On 09/09/2014 02:47 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:46:28PM -0400, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
The printing is along the length of the paper, as opposed to perpendicular.
Known as landscape and portrait respectively.
How do I change it?
Depends on the application you
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:46:28PM -0400, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
> The printing is along the length of the paper, as opposed to perpendicular.
Known as landscape and portrait respectively.
> How do I change it?
Depends on the application you are printing from, but it's usually under
somethi
On 09/08/2014 04:30 AM, Brian wrote:
[I have rearranged one of your responses to be on a separate line to
the question]
On Mon 08 Sep 2014 at 00:08:15 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
On 09/07/2014 04:26 PM, Brian wrote:
Brian -
You didn't say how the printer is accessed by the computer.
US
On 09/08/2014 05:42 AM, Brian wrote:
On Mon 08 Sep 2014 at 11:25:41 +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:30:47 +0100
Brian wrote:
[I have rearranged one of your responses to be on a separate line to
the question]
On Mon 08 Sep 2014 at 00:08:15 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
On Mon 08 Sep 2014 at 11:25:41 +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:30:47 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
> > [I have rearranged one of your responses to be on a separate line to
> > the question]
> >
> >
> > On Mon 08 Sep 2014 at 00:08:15 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> >
> > > On
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:30:47 +0100
Brian wrote:
> [I have rearranged one of your responses to be on a separate line to
> the question]
>
>
> On Mon 08 Sep 2014 at 00:08:15 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
>
> > On 09/07/2014 04:26 PM, Brian wrote:
> >
> > Brian -
> >
> > > You didn't say how the
[I have rearranged one of your responses to be on a separate line to
the question]
On Mon 08 Sep 2014 at 00:08:15 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> On 09/07/2014 04:26 PM, Brian wrote:
>
> Brian -
>
> > You didn't say how the printer is accessed by the computer.
>
> USB
Your "lpstat -a" has
On 09/07/2014 05:26 PM, Brian wrote:
cat TEST | nc 192.168.7.100 9100
cat TEST | nc 112.168.7.100 9100 NO output
TIA
Ethan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://l
On 09/07/2014 04:26 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 07 Sep 2014 at 13:58:55 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
Here it is
You didn't say how the printer is accessed by the computer.
root@meow:/etc/cups/ppd# lpstat -t
device for POS58: socket://192.168.1.100:9100
The printer is networked. A JetDire
On Sun 07 Sep 2014 at 21:26:55 +0100, Brian wrote:
>cat TEST | nc 192.168.7.100 9100 ?
^
^
1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Sun 07 Sep 2014 at 13:58:55 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> Here it is
You didn't say how the printer is accessed by the computer.
> root@meow:/etc/cups/ppd# lpstat -t
> device for POS58: socket://192.168.1.100:9100
The printer is networked. A JetDirect or another type of device?
> POS5
On 09/07/2014 04:56 AM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 07 Sep 2014 at 00:05:33 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
I have a Brainydeal receipt printer made by Zijiang. I have
downloaded and setup their driver. No Luck.
The message I receive from CUPS is:
Processing - "The printer is not responding."
When I in
On Sun 07 Sep 2014 at 00:05:33 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
> I have a Brainydeal receipt printer made by Zijiang. I have
> downloaded and setup their driver. No Luck.
> The message I receive from CUPS is:
> Processing - "The printer is not responding."
>
> When I installed the driver, it clear
27 matches
Mail list logo
