Hi,
please reply to the list in order to keep all readers informed.
(It would be ok to Cc my mail address, but it is not necessary.)
- Forwarded message from Sakkra Billa -
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:32:37 +0530
From: Sakkra Billa
To: Thomas Schmitt
Subject: Re: Bootloader error grub
- Forwarded message from Sakkra Billa -
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 21:35:33 +0530
From: Sakkra Billa
To: "Andrew M.A. Cater"
Subject: Re: Bootloader error grub minimal bash "load the kernel first" after
installing my live image via calamares installer
Hi,
Sakkra Billa wrote:
> I followed the tutorial
> from: https://www.willhaley.com/blog/custom-debian-live-environment/
> [www.willhaley.com] to make a live custom debian 12 image.
(The xorriso run looks ok.)
> In order to
> install it on my VM I installed calamares, calamares-settings-debian
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 06:56:08PM +0530, Sakkra Billa wrote:
>when i reboot my VM into the installed environment, it boots into
>grub minimal On typing boot it says "load the kernel first".
What kind of VM is this? Which provider, if you are unsure.
Cheers,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ --
On 13 Aug 2023 18:56 +0530, from sakkrabi...@gmail.com (Sakkra Billa):
> but when i
> reboot my VM into the installed environment, it boots into grub minimal
> bash line editing mode. On typing boot it says "load the kernel first".
Sounds to me like GRUB can't find grub.cfg, or it is somehow corru
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 06:56:08PM +0530, Sakkra Billa wrote:
> I followed the tutorial from:
> https://www.willhaley.com/blog/custom-debian-live-environment/ to make a
> live custom debian 12 image. In order to install it on my VM I installed
> calamares, calamares-settings-debian and rsync . The
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:52:06 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> David Baron composed on 2015-10-25 14:53 (UTC+0200):
>
> > I started with wheezy 64 bit install and grub2. Did not have any clue how
> > it worked but it did. When upgraded to Sid, added a kernel and wanted to
> > keep the older on around
David Baron composed on 2015-10-25 14:53 (UTC+0200):
> I started with wheezy 64 bit install and grub2. Did not have any clue how it
> worked but it did.
> When upgraded to Sid, added a kernel and wanted to keep the older on around
> just-in-case, I
> had no idea how to do this with Grub2 so I
On Lu, 28 mar 11, 11:04:01, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Is it possible for syslinux to load another syslinux with it's own
> configuration file found in another directory? If so, where can I
> find sample?
If you don't get useful answers in a few days you might want to look for
some syslinux mailing
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Haines Brown wrote:
> It happened that I could no longer mount my ide cdrom or my scsi cdrom
> drives
that is a simple kernel option problem
- fix lilo/grub config files
- manually installt he modules manuall
> I can boot all three disks from a grub boot flo
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 07:42:53PM -0700, Matthew Jackson wrote:
> Ok. I posted earlier about not being able to boot GRUB or LILO on my second
> HD from the XP NTLDR. It gave me the error "Unable to load from hard drive.
> Please insert System disk and hit enter" I though that was bootpart giving
hi ya micha
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > > > - /boot should NOT be a separate partition
> > >
>
> That NOT true. The right line today is
> /boot no longer needs to be a separate partition.
okay ... i'll bite ...
> It used to be required due to bios limitations on the
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 03:29:59PM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Robert Epprecht wrote:
>
> > Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > - /boot should NOT be a separate partition
> >
That NOT true. The right line today is
/boot no longer needs to be a separate pa
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Robert Epprecht wrote:
> Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > - /boot should NOT be a separate partition
>
> Why? Please elaborate.
even if you can boot, you do NOT have a root fs ..
( /etc /bin /sbin /lib /dev ... )
you can always use a fd or cd or network to
Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - /boot should NOT be a separate partition
Why? Please elaborate.
Robert Epprecht
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Matthew Jackson wrote:
>
> I just downloaded the weekly build for Sarge and burnt the first iso.
> The install goes great but when asked to install GRUB, I decide not to
> install to the MBR so it asks me where to install it to. The reason is
> I have XP on one hard disk and Linux on the other h
>
> To: "Matthew Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 4:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Bootloader for Sarge
>
>
> >On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 01:39:23PM -0700, Matthew Jackson wrote:
> >>I just downloaded th
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, William Ballard wrote:
> I know what the reasons are for using seperate partitions,
> but I just can't bother. Linux isn't Unix, it's closer to
> being Windows than it is Unix. It's a crummy desktop O/S on
> commodity Intel whiteboxes.
>
> Just use one big giant / part an
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:32:53PM -0500, Patrick Albuquerque wrote:
> > Matthew Jackson wrote:
> On it I have partitioned it into these:
> >/boot 250mb
> >/tmp 750mb
> >/var 1gb
> >/ 10gb
> >/usr 20gb
> >swap 1gb
> >/home remainder ~40gb
>
>
> I think you might find that /boot is about 10 time
> Matthew Jackson wrote:
On it I have partitioned it into these:
>/boot 250mb
>/tmp 750mb
>/var 1gb
>/ 10gb
>/usr 20gb
>swap 1gb
>/home remainder ~40gb
I think you might find that /boot is about 10 times larger than
necessary, and / is about 50 to 100 times what you need for a
workstation.
hth
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:24:17PM -0500, hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
> Do you have 2 hard disks? The 1st must be hda and the second hdb. Why
> hdc? Also it ought to be possible by this release of the installer to
> use LILO. I always use LILO.
FYI, under Linux, for IDE drives,
hda = master
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 01:39:23PM -0700, Matthew Jackson wrote:
> I just downloaded the weekly build for Sarge and burnt the first iso.
> The install goes great but when asked to install GRUB, I decide not
> to install to the MBR so it asks me where to install it to. The
> reason is I have XP on o
Matthew Jackson wrote:
I just downloaded the weekly build for Sarge and burnt the first iso.
The install goes great but when asked to install GRUB, I decide not to
install to the MBR so it asks me where to install it to. The reason is I
have XP on one hard disk and Linux on the other hard disk.
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 08:46:33AM -0400, Jason Healy wrote:
| Here at work I paved my Dell optiplex and put both Windows (cause I have to)
| and Debian (cause I want to) on it.
|
| I need a bootloader that understands USB, so I can pick which OS to boot.
| Right now I can't because the computer d
24 matches
Mail list logo
