On 09 Nov 2002 02:39:33 -0500, Scott Henson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 14:18, Pigeon wrote:
>> It is true that Windoze doesn't like changes to the MBR. To hack the
>> Win98 MBR I had to include code to put the original MBR back after the
>> hack had done its work, then make W
On 09 Nov 2002 02:39:33 -0500, Scott Henson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 14:18, Pigeon wrote:
>> It is true that Windoze doesn't like changes to the MBR. To hack the
>> Win98 MBR I had to include code to put the original MBR back after the
>> hack had done its work, then make
an example of
the boot.ini entry you would need, let me know I might be able to dig one up
on one my systems.
vec
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan E Norman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian-user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 1:41
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 02:39:33AM -0500, Scott Henson wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 14:18, Pigeon wrote:
> > It is true that Windoze doesn't like changes to the MBR. To hack the
> > Win98 MBR I had to include code to put the original MBR back after the
> > hack had done its work, then make Windoz
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 14:18, Pigeon wrote:
> It is true that Windoze doesn't like changes to the MBR. To hack the
> Win98 MBR I had to include code to put the original MBR back after the
> hack had done its work, then make Windoze reinstall the hacked version
> after it had done its check. That rel
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:45:40 -0500, Gleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote:
>>
>> I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but I
>> do not know where to ask it anywhere else :-(
>>
>> I want to boot a bunch of dual-bo
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote:
>
> I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but I
> do not know where to ask it anywhere else :-(
>
> I want to boot a bunch of dual-boot stations which are running under
> Windows 2000 to Linux. I tried loadli
Levi Waldron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've heard that win2k won't stand for LILO replacing its own MBR.
My laptop dual-boots Win2K and Debian unstable with GRUB in the MBR,
and both sides work fine.
--
David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/
"Theoretical
Hi debian-user-digest-request!
On Thu, 07 Nov 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Levi Waldron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Booting Linux from windows 2000
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:02:56 -0500
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thursday 07 November 2002 10:02 am, Levi Waldron wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On November 7, 2002 11:49 am, Rob Weir wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote:
> > > I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On November 7, 2002 11:49 am, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote:
> > I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but I do
> > not know where to ask it anywhere else :-(
> >
> > I want to
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote:
>
> I know that this question is not specially relevant to debian, but I do not
> know where to ask it anywhere else :-(
>
> I want to boot a bunch of dual-boot stations which are running under Windows
> 2000 to Linux. I tried loadli
12 matches
Mail list logo
