On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:41:42 -0500
Felix Miata wrote:
> Dan Norton composed on 2018-02-22 16:05 (UTC-0500):
>
> > Installs of both stretch and buster modify the boot order such that
> > "debian" is first under "UEFI Boot Sources". After installation, the
> > bios menu has to be edited in order t
Dan Norton composed on 2018-02-22 16:05 (UTC-0500):
> Installs of both stretch and buster modify the boot order such that
> "debian" is first under "UEFI Boot Sources". After installation, the
> bios menu has to be edited in order to boot from DVD or CD or USB
> drive. Also "Hard Drive" has been r
Well, this is embarrassing.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> give me a break!
>
> 2014/06/16 0:46 "Chris Bannister" :
> [off-list comments that I responded to on-list]
:-/
(I'm pretty sure Chris didn't mind, but I think we could have had a
slightly more interesting discussion
give me a break!
2014/06/16 0:46 "Chris Bannister" :
>
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 08:46:18PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> > I'd rather reply to you off-list to keep the noise level down, but --
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Pol Hallen
> > wrote:
>
> Just for the record, some people conside
On 6/15/2014 6:20 AM, Pol Hallen wrote:
>> It's a pity that your reactions are defensive. You might learn a lot
>> from what people here are trying to make clear to you - if you are
>> receptive to it.
>
> Hi Siard, thanks for your reply. I don't want be unpleasant but I only
> wrote an email on t
I'd rather reply to you off-list to keep the noise level down, but --
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Pol Hallen
wrote:
-- replying to your e-mail address is going to screw up my filter heuristics.
I don't know how you got you domain name approved, but it's the kind
of domain name I see when I
It's a pity that your reactions are defensive. You might learn a lot
from what people here are trying to make clear to you - if you are
receptive to it.
Hi Siard, thanks for your reply. I don't want be unpleasant but I only
wrote an email on the ML. In the life always there's (and will there) t
Pol Hallen:
> Lisi:
> > No, but if all of us decide not to like it, and kill-file you as I
> > am now doing, it might become your problem if you wanted help.
>
> "all of us?" have your fear to manage alone the situation? so you ask
> help to "all of us"...
>
> I don't want waste my time, from no
No, but if all of us decide not to like it, and kill-file you as I am now
doing, it might become your problem if you wanted help.
"all of us?" have your fear to manage alone the situation? so you ask
help to "all of us"...
I don't want waste my time, from now I don't reply you again
P.
--
On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 09:56 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> My mega-apologize for the PPPS :S
>
> [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ RETVAL=foo_bar
> [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat .msmtp.mail/fraud.mail | msmtp -a default
> ralf.mard...@rocketmial.com; RETVAL=$?; echo $RETVAL
> 0
> [rocketmouse@archlinux ~
My mega-apologize for the PPPS :S
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ RETVAL=foo_bar
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat .msmtp.mail/fraud.mail | msmtp -a default
ralf.mard...@rocketmial.com; RETVAL=$?; echo $RETVAL
0
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ RETVAL=foo_bar
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat .msmtp.mail/fraud.ma
My apologize for the PPS, but without the && it also seems to work:
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat .msmtp.mail/fraud.mail | msmtp -a default
ralf.mard...@rocketmial.com; RETVAL=$?; echo $RETVAL
0
The "0" is displayed with delay, IOW RETVAL=$?; echo $RETVAL has to wait until
the sending of the m
On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 09:34 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 09:10 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 01:46 -0400, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote:
> >
> > > > echo "${SHUTDOWNBODY}" | mail -s "${SHUTDOWNSUBJECT}" ${EMAIL}
> > > > sleep 4
> > > > RETVAL=$?
On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 09:10 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 01:46 -0400, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote:
>
> > > echo "${SHUTDOWNBODY}" | mail -s "${SHUTDOWNSUBJECT}" ${EMAIL}
> > > sleep 4
> > > RETVAL=$?
> >
> > i can't comment on the rest of the script, but you probab
On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 01:46 -0400, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote:
> > echo "${SHUTDOWNBODY}" | mail -s "${SHUTDOWNSUBJECT}" ${EMAIL}
> > sleep 4
> > RETVAL=$?
>
> i can't comment on the rest of the script, but you probably want
> RETVAL to be the exit status of the pipeline that sends the
hi.
EMAIL="root"
RESTARTSUBJECT="["`hostname`" "`date`"] – System Startup"
SHUTDOWNSUBJECT="["`hostname`" "`date`"] – System Shutdown"
RESTARTBODY="This is an automated message to notify you that "`hostname`"
started successfully. Start up Date and Time: "`date`
SHUTDOWNBODY="This is an automat
On Saturday 14 June 2014 22:11:05 Pol Hallen wrote:
> domain (mine) of email (mine) is not your problem and if you don't like
> it's not my problem ;-)
No, but if all of us decide not to like it, and kill-file you as I am now
doing, it might become your problem if you wanted help.
Lisi
--
To
But you are are not going to show this script to us.
:-) See at the end of email
You might want to look at @reboot with cron for the startup.
thanks :-)
The domain for your email address is
[...]
domain (mine) of email (mine) is not your problem and if you don't like
it's not my problem
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:16:08 +0100
Brian wrote:
> You might want to look at @reboot with cron for
> the startup. Don't say I didn't help you.
Not to mention there are tons of howtos about this matter
on the web, as it is the most basic of monitoring…
--
<@rondoudou> hi, somebody want to cook f
On Sat 14 Jun 2014 at 20:09:41 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> on debian stable I added a script to /etc/init.d/, that script sends
> an email when the system boot and when the system shutdown
But you are are not going to show this script to us. It is a secret. so
we do not know whether it is a viable
> Where do I do that from the debian installer ? (I used option "LVM on
> entire disk").
If you use LVM then every logical volume already has a name
(independently from the label you may have set or not on each file
system).
So just use that insted of a UUID. I.e. use something like
/dev/mapper/-
Dne, 04. 06. 2010 17:54:31 je Mathieu Malaterre napisal(a):
Where do I do that from the debian installer ? (I used option "LVM on
entire disk").
Gosh, I've never used LVM in my life, so can't be of any help here.
However, I seem to remember at least one thing correctly: there *is* a
step f
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 04. 06. 2010 17:07:51 je Mathieu Malaterre napisal(a):
>>
>> However after installation it looks like grub switch its internal hd0
>> / hd1 (device map file) in between /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1.
>> I had to manually invert them, re-run grub-install
Dne, 04. 06. 2010 17:07:51 je Mathieu Malaterre napisal(a):
However after installation it looks like grub switch its internal hd0
/ hd1 (device map file) in between /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1.
I had to manually invert them, re-run grub-install.
This happen on a DELL Precision WorkStation T7500.
Does t
> "Ed" == Ed Falis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ed> I have a jaz drive attached to my machine via a SCSI card plugged
Ed> into a PCMCIA slot (kernel 2.4.3). Is there a way to get it to
Ed> automount during boot by getting the PCMCIA services started
Ed> before processing fstab? Or some other op
Hello Lindsay,
have you read my latest good news! :-] BTW thanks alot for all the help
on the NIC problem. I really appreciate it :-)
> I remove all reference to drive C in the bios - Linux finds it anyway.
Yep I did it and it worked! :)
> Set to Only or Master - it will not work as a slav
> > Well I just disabled the BIOS and it worked... Is this ok to do?
>
> yup, i do just the same on my setup - i pretend to the bios that i dont
> have any ide disk, so that i can boot on my scsi drive.
>
> of course, this does not work for people who use a so-called operating
> system that depen
On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, David M wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I have just added a master IDE drive (primary IDE) to my linux setup. Now
> it is trying to boot from it rather than my SCSI HDD (the one where Linux
> is). Can I change this? I had my drive setup as a slave b4 (without a
> master) and e
On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, David M wrote:
> Hi again
>
> Well I just disabled the BIOS and it worked... Is this ok to do?
I remove all reference to drive C in the bios - Linux finds it anyway.
> If I only have one IDE drive should I set it to slave or master (I know
> normally is master) in L
29 matches
Mail list logo
