On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:34:06PM -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
| Hendrik Sattler writes:
| >Guessing: your $PATH contains "." before the "/bin"
| >Bad thing!
| >When in doubt: run /bin/ls instead of ls.
|
| Wow! I've been doing UNIX for around 14 years and am flat
| ashamed of myself. I
Hendrik Sattler writes:
>Guessing: your $PATH contains "." before the "/bin"
>Bad thing!
>When in doubt: run /bin/ls instead of ls.
Wow! I've been doing UNIX for around 14 years and am flat
ashamed of myself. I have now put . at the end of the path and, of
course it all works. I have he
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 03:24 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Whaddaya mean "a while back"? It's still in Sid...
>
> Erm, based on me not being able to find it with "locate". I figured it
> had been subsumed into the shells like some other former external commands.
> :D
Si
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Whaddaya mean "a while back"? It's still in Sid...
Erm, based on me not being able to find it with "locate". I figured it
had been subsumed into the shells like some other former external commands. :D
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrin
Martin McCormick wrote:
> -r-xr-xr-x2 root root 301376 Jan 21 09:45 ls
> Thanks for any hints as to why this directory doesn't list if
> one is in it but does list if one is either root or doing ls from
> outside the bin directory.
Guessing: your $PATH contains "." before the "/bin"
On ven, 2005-07-22 at 18:11 +1000, Geoff Reidy wrote:
> $ dpkg -S '/usr/bin/\['
> coreutils: /usr/bin/[
>
> Must admit I never knew it was a separate binary.
it's also a shell builtin (at least in bash)
$ type [
[ is a shell builtin
--
strawks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: T
Ron Johnson wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't determine it's package using the usual tool:
$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/[
dpkg: /usr/bin/[ not found.
$ dpkg -S "/usr/bin/["
dpkg: /usr/bin/[ not found.
$ dpkg -S '/usr/bin/['
dpkg: /usr/bin/[ not found.
$ dpkg -S '/usr/bin/\['
coreutils
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 20:48 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Martin McCormick wrote:
> > Other directories seem normal. What could possibly be going
> > on here? Here is a listing of what is in bin. There is a file named
> > [ but that is the only strange thing in the listing and it is not
> > cau
Martin McCormick wrote:
> Other directories seem normal. What could possibly be going
> on here? Here is a listing of what is in bin. There is a file named
> [ but that is the only strange thing in the listing and it is not
> causing the behavior:
Well, I can't say why it is happening
9 matches
Mail list logo
