On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:27:38AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ont Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:27:37 +1100,
> Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> > [1 ]
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 05:06:07AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:13:15 +1100,
> > > Rob Weir wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [1 ]
>
Ont Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:27:37 +1100,
Rob Weir wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 05:06:07AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:13:15 +1100,
> > Rob Weir wrote:
> > >
> > > [1 ]
> > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:19:18PM +, p wrote:
> > > > ...and having the abil
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 05:06:07AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:13:15 +1100,
> Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> > [1 ]
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:19:18PM +, p wrote:
> > > ...and having the ability to turn off the pop-ups advertising
> > > is a great feature in 7.01.
> >
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:13:15 +1100,
Rob Weir wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:19:18PM +, p wrote:
> > ...and having the ability to turn off the pop-ups advertising
> > is a great feature in 7.01.
>
> Which has been in Mozilla for over a year, and was consiously
> hidden away by N
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:25:19PM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Hi, I'm using Debian 3.0r1 stable (woody) and am currently using Galon for
> >web-surfing. However, it seems to break on some sites - they seem to be
> >moaning about Frames support mostly.
> >
> >Anyway,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:19:18PM +, p wrote:
> ...and having the ability to turn
> off the pop-ups advertising is a
> great feature in 7.01.
Which has been in Mozilla for over a year, and was consiously hidden
away by Netscape to make it more difficult to disable popups.
--
Rob Weir <[EMA
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:00:32AM +1300, Haralambos Geortgilakis wrote:
>
>
> Hi Yall & Kevin,
>
> I am on Netscape 7.0.1 & like it very much.
>
> There is no .deb file, but the installer rocks.
>
>
>ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/netscape7/english/7.01/unix/linux22/sea/netscape-i686-pc-linux-gn
on Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:10:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi, I'm using Debian 3.0r1 stable (woody) and am currently using Galon for
> web-surfing. However, it seems to break on some sites - they seem to be
> moaning about Frames support mostly.
Shouldn't happen.
Ch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Anyway, which browser should I use under gnome to get the most pages
>viewed?
>
>I'd prefer a .deb package from stable
Phoenix has daily builds which are easy to use. You unpack the tar to any
directory (your home directory is just fine) and it's ready to run. To
unins
Hi Yall & Kevin,
I am on Netscape 7.0.1 & like it very much.
There is no .deb file, but the installer rocks.
ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/netscape7/english/7.01/unix/linux22/sea/netscape-i686-pc-linux-gnu-sea.tar.gz
Happy surfing,
Greek Geek :-)
"I don't know that you can measure public opin
Thus spake Tom:
> Phoenix indeed is a possibility. But did you (meaning the OP)
> mention the need of a light weight browser? If not, what's
> wrong with good old Mozilla itself?
Phoenix trims out a lot of extra cruft from Mozilla, and in my
experience is a lot snappier and faster to load.
Also,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi, I'm using Debian 3.0r1 stable (woody) and am currently using Galon for
>web-surfing. However, it seems to break on some sites - they seem to be
>moaning about Frames support mostly.
>
>Anyway, which browser should I use under gnome to get the most pages
>viewed?
>
>I'
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 03:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, I'm using Debian 3.0r1 stable (woody) and am currently using Galon for
> web-surfing. However, it seems to break on some sites - they seem to be
> moaning about Frames support mostly.
I have had this problem and have tested it out myself.
Matthew Weier O'Phinney:
> Wierd -- shouldn't happen, as it's based on Mozilla, which has
> always had decent frames support.
Exactly my thought.
>>> Anyway, which browser should I use under gnome to get the most
>>> pages viewed?
Phoenix indeed is a possibility. But did you (meaning the OP)
-- Dave Selby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Tuesday, 18 February 2003, 10:21 AM +):
> On Tuesday 18 February 2003 10:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi, I'm using Debian 3.0r1 stable (woody) and am currently using Galon for
> > web-surfing. However, it seems to break on some sites - they se
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:10:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, I'm using Debian 3.0r1 stable (woody) and am currently using Galon for
> web-surfing. However, it seems to break on some sites - they seem to be
> moaning about Frames support mostly.
>
> Anyway, which browser should I use un
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 10:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, I'm using Debian 3.0r1 stable (woody) and am currently using Galon for
> web-surfing. However, it seems to break on some sites - they seem to be
> moaning about Frames support mostly.
>
> Anyway, which browser should I use under g
17 matches
Mail list logo