On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 12:01 -0400, Manaen Schlabach wrote:
> On 4/21/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 03:37 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > > On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>
> It seems like everyone agrees that Video card manufacturers really
> don't
On 4/21/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 03:37 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Still, if they come out with reasonably priced cards that can do
> > > 3D like an NVIDIA FX 5200 using the nvidia binary driver, I'd
> >
> > How
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 03:37 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Still, if they come out with reasonably priced cards that can do
> > 3D like an NVIDIA FX 5200 using the nvidia binary driver, I'd
>
> How exactly is the performance of such a beast? I have never had
On Thursday 20 April 2006 23:37, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Still, if they come out with reasonably priced cards that can do
> > 3D like an NVIDIA FX 5200 using the nvidia binary driver, I'd
>
> How exactly is the performance of such a beast? I have never had the
On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Still, if they come out with reasonably priced cards that can do
> 3D like an NVIDIA FX 5200 using the nvidia binary driver, I'd
How exactly is the performance of such a beast? I have never had the
opportunity of using a binary driver for video, since I don't n
On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
> When Intel makes "stand-alone" video cards, they'll get more notice
> from those of us who don't want on-board video.
Actually, between the choices of being able to use the driver even if
the card is on-board or not using it (or it having poor support under
Fre
On 4/19/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 16:53 -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:
> > i have found a video driver on intel 82810 onboard video on they're
> > site at www.intel.com in the downloads and support section, i couldn't
> > get it to install since i am new to
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 19:34, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 17:27 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 April 2006 17:08, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 16:53 -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:
> > > > i have found a video driver on intel 82810 onboard video on
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 17:27 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 April 2006 17:08, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 16:53 -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:
> > > i have found a video driver on intel 82810 onboard video on they're
> > > site at www.intel.com in the downloads and sup
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 17:08, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 16:53 -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:
> > i have found a video driver on intel 82810 onboard video on they're
> > site at www.intel.com in the downloads and support section, i couldn't
> > get it to install since i am new t
right i see what you meanRon Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 16:53 -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:> i have found a video driver on intel 82810 onboard video on they're> site at www.intel.com in the downloads and support section, i couldn't> get it to install since i am new
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 16:53 -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:
> i have found a video driver on intel 82810 onboard video on they're
> site at www.intel.com in the downloads and support section, i couldn't
> get it to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.
When Intel makes "stand-alone" vi
i have found a video driver on intel 82810 onboard video on they're site at www.intel.com in the downloads and support section, i couldn't get it to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Manaen and others interested in Freedom.On Apr 18 200
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Manaen and others interested in Freedom.On Apr 18 2006, Manaen Schlabach wrote:> From a recent ZDNet article> > http://news.com.com/2102-7344_3-6061491.html?tag=st.util.printYes, I read this very same article with great interest (and what a goodtimi
Hi, Manaen and others interested in Freedom.
On Apr 18 2006, Manaen Schlabach wrote:
> From a recent ZDNet article
>
> http://news.com.com/2102-7344_3-6061491.html?tag=st.util.print
Yes, I read this very same article with great interest (and what a good
timing it had, considering our discuss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans, thank you for the information. I hadn't realized that the nv
driver was written by nVidia.
One point not in its favor, in addition to not doing 3D acceleration,
is that it doesn't support 24/32 bit colour either.
The "Debian blue swirl" that
On 4/17/06, Roy Pluschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 01:28 +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 15:01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I've seen reports that the free nv drivers are now as good as the
> > > proprietary nvidia drivers. At lest some poste
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 01:28 +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 15:01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've seen reports that the free nv drivers are now as good as the
> > proprietary nvidia drivers. At lest some posters on some of the linux
> > groups seem to think so. Now
On 4/16/06, Manaen Schlabach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/16/06, John Carline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Manaen Schlabach wrote:
> >
> > >Well I am finally thinking about upgrading my tired old radeon 7500.
> > >I know that ATI and Nvidia both have decent cards but their drivers
>
On 4/16/06, John Carline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Manaen Schlabach wrote:
>
> >Well I am finally thinking about upgrading my tired old radeon 7500.
> >I know that ATI and Nvidia both have decent cards but their drivers
> >are completely closed. I know and understand that companies must
> >
Manaen Schlabach wrote:
Well I am finally thinking about upgrading my tired old radeon 7500.
I know that ATI and Nvidia both have decent cards but their drivers
are completely closed. I know and understand that companies must
protect some of their trade secrets but I would like very much to
Manaen Schlabach wrote:
> Well I am finally thinking about upgrading my tired old radeon 7500.
> I know that ATI and Nvidia both have decent cards but their drivers
> are completely closed. I know and understand that companies must
> protect some of their trade secrets but I would like very much
From: "Manaen Schlabach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well I am finally thinking about upgrading my tired old radeon 7500.
I know that ATI and Nvidia both have decent cards but their drivers
are completely closed. I know and understand that companies must
protect some of their trade secrets but I would l
Hi, Manaen.
On Apr 15 2006, Manaen Schlabach wrote:
(...)
> I know that ATI and Nvidia both have decent cards but their drivers
> are completely closed. I know and understand that companies must
> protect some of their trade secrets but I would like very much to
> support a graphics manufacturer
> I've seen reports that the free nv drivers are now as good as the
> proprietary nvidia drivers.
If no hardware 3D acceleration is good enough for you, then they might
be as good. Otherwise you are stuck with their proprietary drivers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 15:01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've seen reports that the free nv drivers are now as good as the
> proprietary nvidia drivers. At lest some posters on some of the linux
> groups seem to think so. Now maybe that's true only for a specific
> model of nvidia card, a
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 01:28:09PM -0400, Manaen Schlabach wrote:
> Well I am finally thinking about upgrading my tired old radeon 7500.
> I know that ATI and Nvidia both have decent cards but their drivers
> are completely closed. I know and understand that companies must
> protect some of their
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 01:28:09PM -0400, Manaen Schlabach wrote:
> Well I am finally thinking about upgrading my tired old radeon 7500.
> I know that ATI and Nvidia both have decent cards but their drivers
> are completely closed.
Their official drivers are completely closed, there are open-sour
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:28:09 -0400
"Manaen Schlabach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I am finally thinking about upgrading my tired old radeon 7500.
Can I have that tired old radeon, to replace my very tired matrox
G100? :) But only if it has a working TV-out ;)
> I know that ATI and Nvidia
Steffen Evers said:
> In particular, Alan Cox has picked out the Nvidea kernel modules as
> a good example how a module "taints" the kernel and explained that
> such tainted kernels will be not debugged in the future.
>
> So, what do you know about graphic cards regarding driver's
> licenses?
th
On Fri, 2001-11-16 at 21:14, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Steffen Evers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have followed the recent discussion about vidoe cards on the list. I
> > have also been looking for a new video card and was thinking about a
> > Nvidea card. However, I have read a
Steffen Evers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have followed the recent discussion about vidoe cards on the list. I
> have also been looking for a new video card and was thinking about a
> Nvidea card. However, I have read about the license problems with
> "tainting" (non-GPL) kernel mo
32 matches
Mail list logo
