Re: Bastille-Linux and Debian / Debian Security

2000-11-02 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 02-Nov-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > how would the sources-lines for woody be? > i don't need source-code, so I suppose updates / non-us and non-free would > be sufficiently. Just writing woody instead of potato doesn't seem to > work... > >> ## security updates >> deb http://security

RE: Bastille-Linux and Debian

2000-11-02 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 02-Nov-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd like to know if Bastille-Linux (which was intended for Red Hat > 6.x-Systems) works fine on Debian, too, if anyone has experiences with it > already > and / or if there's an equivalent for Debian aswell. I have read the bastille perl scripts and I am

Re: Bastille-Linux and Debian / Debian Security

2000-11-02 Thread m_g_m
Hi, how would the sources-lines for woody be? i don't need source-code, so I suppose updates / non-us and non-free would be sufficiently. Just writing woody instead of potato doesn't seem to work... > ## security updates > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ potato/updates main > cont

Re: Bastille-Linux and Debian

2000-11-02 Thread Robert Varga
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 03:39:46PM +0100, Robert Varga wrote: > > > > It probably examines your current ports via something similar to netstat, > > to know what services on what ports are needed and creates a firewall > > script that creates the rules a

Re: Bastille-Linux and Debian

2000-11-02 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 03:39:46PM +0100, Robert Varga wrote: > > It probably examines your current ports via something similar to netstat, > to know what services on what ports are needed and creates a firewall > script that creates the rules according to actual ip, that is good for > that state

Re: Bastille-Linux and Debian

2000-11-02 Thread Robert Varga
It probably examines your current ports via something similar to netstat, to know what services on what ports are needed and creates a firewall script that creates the rules according to actual ip, that is good for that state of the system, as it was in upon running the build script. It probably k

Re: Bastille-Linux and Debian

2000-11-02 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 03:25:53PM +0100, Robert Varga wrote: > > Aside from this, Bastille also sets up a default ipchains firewall for > your system to prevent users to set up services on their own on your > machine, I think. i would be interested in seeing how this can be done without breaking

Re: Bastille-Linux and Debian

2000-11-02 Thread Robert Varga
Aside from this, Bastille also sets up a default ipchains firewall for your system to prevent users to set up services on their own on your machine, I think. Regards, Robert Varga On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 09:26:27AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I

Re: Bastille-Linux and Debian

2000-11-02 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 09:26:27AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd like to know if Bastille-Linux (which was intended for Red Hat > 6.x-Systems) works fine on Debian, too, if anyone has experiences with it > already > and / or if there's an equivalent for Debian aswell. > What do you think/k