Re: backups Was: SSD and HDD

2020-10-13 Thread Dan Ritter
mick crane wrote: > On 2020-10-13 00:46, Dan Ritter wrote: > > mick crane wrote: > > > > > This looks like good advice, thanks Dan and all. > One thing I wonder about if I reboot and change boot order to start windows > is if I might create some confusion on the network as pfsense PC does DHCP >

Re: backups Was: SSD and HDD

2020-10-13 Thread mick crane
On 2020-10-13 00:46, Dan Ritter wrote: mick crane wrote: might I ask a favour for information on accepted wisdom for this stuff ? I being a home user have pfsense on old lenovo between ISP router and switch to PCs another old buster lenovo doing email another Buster PC I do bits of programmi

Re: Backups - Was: clonezilla WORKS !

2014-01-10 Thread Jerry Stuckle
On 1/10/2014 4:18 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: PS: On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 15:29 -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote: anyway, I had JUST LAST WEEK created a clonezilla backup on another partition ! This is not a backup by definition! A backup has to be done on an independent device, even not to another HDD

Re: Backups - Was: clonezilla WORKS !

2014-01-10 Thread Paul Cartwright
On 01/10/2014 04:15 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Clonezilla, rsync etc. do work, but why spending that much brain power > for learning and/or trial and error? HDDs are inexpensive nowadays, so I > prefer to do a simple tar.gz from another Linux install, without any > kind of smart sync. I simply backu

Re: Backups - Was: clonezilla WORKS !

2014-01-10 Thread Ralf Mardorf
PS: On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 15:29 -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote: > anyway, I had JUST LAST WEEK created a clonezilla backup on another > partition ! This is not a backup by definition! A backup has to be done on an independent device, even not to another HDD that is mounted inside of the computer. U

Re: Backups - was Re: LVM

2010-06-16 Thread Alan Chandler
On 15/06/10 14:31, Tom Furie wrote: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:02:47PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: On 15/06/10 12:44, Alan Chandler wrote: The real magic command is "cp -alf" which essentially merges a shorter term store with a longer term one, making new entries where the shorter store has a

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-16 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/16/2010 05:45 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Ron Johnson put forth on 6/15/2010 10:59 AM: I wrote a script that only backs up our data directories (including much of /home) into a bunch of tarballs, excluding "junk" folders like caches, thumbnails, trash, etc, and compressing most but not stuff

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-16 Thread Lisi
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 14:14:22 Camaleón wrote: > Many people send the replies to me directly and I am not sure > whether if they are full aware of that (intentionally off-list) or this > is just the famous Gmail's webmail "non-reply-to-list-but-sender" > error :-) I forgot that Gmail does that

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-16 Thread Lisi
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 14:14:22 Camaleón wrote: > but I asked you why you were so reluctant to use > differential backups on her computer. I couldn't understand "why" because > today backup tasks are just "point-and-click", I mean, they are easier to > achieve than any image generation of the wh

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-16 Thread Camaleón
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:05:56 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Wednesday 16 June 2010 08:41:03 Camaleón wrote: >> El 2010-06-15 a las 22:58 +0100, Lisi escribió: >> >> (resending to the list) > > Sorry. I debated whether to send it to you or the list, and decided > that it was OT for the list since I was

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Ron Johnson put forth on 6/15/2010 10:59 AM: > I wrote a script that only backs up our data directories (including much > of /home) into a bunch of tarballs, excluding "junk" folders like > caches, thumbnails, trash, etc, and compressing most but not stuff like > image and OOo document directories

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-16 Thread Lisi
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 08:41:03 Camaleón wrote: > El 2010-06-15 a las 22:58 +0100, Lisi escribió: > > (resending to the list) Sorry. I debated whether to send it to you or the list, and decided that it was OT for the list since I was commenting on a specific sentence of your that wasn't stri

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-16 Thread Camaleón
El 2010-06-15 a las 22:58 +0100, Lisi escribió: (resending to the list) > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:44:33 Camaleón wrote: > > But it's "her" backup and "her" data. She should care about how to do > > things like these, whatever place she is (home, university, work...). > > I was forgetting that

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Rob Owens
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 06:49:25PM +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote: > > > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote: > > >> I would differentiate between "backup" data and "archived" data. > > > > (...) >

Re: an apology - was Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/15/2010 05:02 PM, Lisi wrote: Sorry for duplicate everybody. The list has been rejecting my emails with my usual SMTP set up. This means that I may think that something has gone when it hasn't or vice versa. Something like that happened to me a year or so ago when my ISP got much stri

an apology - was Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Lisi
Sorry for duplicate everybody. The list has been rejecting my emails with my usual SMTP set up. This means that I may think that something has gone when it hasn't or vice versa. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Lisi
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:09:28 Ron Johnson wrote: > *Teach* her. She's in Uni, correct? Thus, she should be > responsible enough to take care of her own data by sticking in a USB > drive and running a script. Two people divided by a common language No, she's at school, where school in thi

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Lisi
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:09:28 Ron Johnson wrote: > *Teach* her.  She's in Uni, correct?  Thus, she should be > responsible enough to take care of her own data by sticking in a USB > drive and running a script. Two people divided by a common language No, she's at school, where school in thi

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/15/2010 01:18 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: [snip] I think the OP said something like: I have 1.3 TB and it's too big to backup. This of course is patently ridiculous. meh. Right. You're a fool to buy a Lexus if you can't afford the (way more than bare legal minimum) auto insurance

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:49:25 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote: >> Why not practical? Just curious O:-) > > Because I shan't have hold of the computer for long enough or often > enough! But it's "her" backup and "her" data. She should care about how to do thi

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:27:47PM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Lisi wrote: > > Please excuse the thread breaking.  I have suddenly been being rejected by > > the > > list server and am sending for the third time.  I hope that the list server > > is now happy w

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:59:46AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 06/15/2010 09:48 AM, Lisi wrote: > > > >Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's saying: > > > >There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big > >enough to hold the data. > > > > > >I can thin

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/15/2010 12:49 PM, Lisi wrote: On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote: On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote: On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote: I would differentiate between "backup" data and "archived" data. (...) Thanks for this. I was originally re

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Lisi
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote: > >> I would differentiate between "backup" data and "archived" data. > > (...) > > > Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's say

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Ron Johnson wrote: On 06/15/2010 05:32 AM, Lisi wrote: On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big enough to hold the data. Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this problem for my

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote: >> I would differentiate between "backup" data and "archived" data. (...) > Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's saying: > > There are many many ways to make take backups bey

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/15/2010 09:48 AM, Lisi wrote: Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's saying: There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big enough to hold the data. I can think of very few - and was interested in what he was thinking of. Incremental/differenti

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/15/2010 05:32 AM, Lisi wrote: On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big enough to hold the data. Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this problem for my granddaughter's large

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Lisi
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:32:15 +0100, Lisi wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > >> There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big > >> enough to hold the data. > > > > Would you feel incli

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:32:15 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >> There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big >> enough to hold the data. > > Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this problem > for m

Re: Backups - was Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Tom Furie
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:02:47PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: > On 15/06/10 12:44, Alan Chandler wrote: > >> The real magic command is "cp -alf" which essentially merges a shorter >> term store with a longer term one, making new entries where the shorter >> store has a file that isn't in the longe

Re: Backups - was Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Alan Chandler
On 15/06/10 12:44, Alan Chandler wrote: The real magic command is "cp -alf" which essentially merges a shorter term store with a longer term one, making new entries where the shorter store has a file that isn't in the longer term store, and overwriting it where the shorter term store has a file

Re: Backups - was Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Alan Chandler
On 15/06/10 11:36, Lisi wrote: On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big enough to hold the data. Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this problem for my granddaughter's large HDD,

Re: Backups - was: Re: LVM

2010-06-15 Thread Alexander Samad
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Lisi wrote: > Please excuse the thread breaking.  I have suddenly been being rejected by the > list server and am sending for the third time.  I hope that the list server > is now happy with my SMTP settings. > > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-We

RE: backups RE: ATA 80GB disk recommendation

2005-11-06 Thread David Christensen
Alvin Oga wrote: > - i see you haven't been hit with a power surge that took out > everything connected to the power supply ... Thankfully, no. I've also heard that if a voltage regulator chip goes out in the power supply, then the results can be the same. It would be nice if my other box with

Re: Backups - what files can safely be omitted?

2004-12-29 Thread Roberto Sanchez
Robert S wrote: Thanks for the folks who advised me re backing up a running system. I'm just testing mondo at the moment. Looks ideal for my purposes. What files can safely be omitted from a debian system backup? Obvious ones are /var/cache/apt/archives (if you're like me an hold onto these file

Re: backups Re: Have I been sniffed? - wl

2004-08-27 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya bradley On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Bradley M Alexander wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:25:21PM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote: ... > > i equate the "wireless" between to wirelss-pc to be the equivalent > > of 2 wired=pcs.. > > - anybody ( in the world ) can sniff the copper wire > > - an

Re: backups Re: Have I been sniffed?

2004-08-27 Thread Bradley M Alexander
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:25:21PM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote: > > hi ya > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Bradley M Alexander wrote: > > > Depends. I have wireless, and three things I do, from least to most > > draconian: > > > > 1. Turn off SSID broadcasting. > > 2. Turn on WEP as high as possible (DLinks

Re: backups using tar - /dev/ht0

2001-08-11 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya bob ...beg/borrow/steal a (real) dds1, dds2, dds3 ide tape drive... - hp series, exabyte series, etc and try to read/write to that drive c ya alvin On 11 Aug 2001, Bob Koss wrote: > > "Alvin" == Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Alvin> if the device is made prop

Re: backups using tar - /dev/ht0

2001-08-11 Thread Bob Koss
> "Alvin" == Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alvin> if the device is made properly... it should be like Alvin> crw-rw 1 root disk 37, 0 May 5 1998 /dev/ht0 Alvin> until "ls -la /dev/ht0" looks liek the above line... there Alvin> is no point to doing any mt/tar comm

Re: backups using tar - /dev/ht0

2001-08-11 Thread Bob Koss
> "Alvin" == Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alvin> so you do NOT have /dev/ht0 as a device Alvin> manually creaate a device called /dev/ht0 with mknod... Alvin> and give it the type, and major and minor id Alvin> if the device is made properly... it should be like

Re: backups using tar - /dev/ht0

2001-08-10 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya bob... mt is complaining so you do NOT have /dev/ht0 as a device until mt worksand you can hear the tape rewind and/or eject... its NOT working yet... manually creaate a device called /dev/ht0 with mknod... and give it the type, and major and minor id if the device is made

Re: backups using tar - /dev/ht0

2001-08-10 Thread Bob Koss
> "Alvin" == Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alvin> did you try: cd /dev ./MAKEDEV ht0 That's exactly what I did. Alvin> = should work, if not... Alvin> more info Alvin> http://www-wsg.cso.uiuc.edu/resources/unixguide/devices.html Alvin> you do it the

Re: backups using tar

2001-08-10 Thread Bob Koss
> "Alvin" == Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alvin> hi ya bob Alvin> you created a file called /dev/ht0 that filled up the Alvin> available space in / causes device full to tar /dev/ht0 was supposed to go to my tape drive. Why didn't it??? -- Robert Koss, Ph.D.

Re: backups using tar - /dev/ht0

2001-08-10 Thread Alvin Oga
> Alvin> you need to create a tape decice called /dev/ht0 and/or ln > Alvin> -s /dev/hdc /dev/ht0 ( donno if it would work ) > > Alvin>"MAKEDEV /dev/ht0" should work > > MAKDEV: don't know hot to make device "/dev/ht0" > > Now I seem to be screwed. did you try: cd /dev

Re: backups using tar

2001-08-10 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya bob you created a file called /dev/ht0 that filled up the available space in / causes device full to tar c ya alvin On 10 Aug 2001, Bob Koss wrote: > > > "Alvin" == Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Alvin> if the device is full... you have too much data > >

Re: backups using tar

2001-08-10 Thread Bob Koss
> "Alvin" == Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alvin> you need to remove the file called /dev/ht0 that was Alvin> created by the tar command when trying to write to tape Alvin> that did not work... Alvin> you need to create a tape decice called /dev/ht0 and/or ln Alvin

Re: backups using tar

2001-08-10 Thread Bob Koss
> "Alvin" == Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alvin> if the device is full... you have too much data The device isn't full. When I issued the tar command, it worked for a few seconds and then gave me the error message. Nothing went to tape. -- Robert Koss, Ph.D. | Train

Re: backups using tar

2001-08-10 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya bob you need to remove the file called /dev/ht0 that was created by the tar command when trying to write to tape that did not work... you need to create a tape decice called /dev/ht0 and/or ln -s /dev/hdc /dev/ht0 ( donno if it would work ) "MAKEDEV /dev/ht0" should work now do

Re: backups using tar

2001-08-10 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya bob if the device is full... you have too much data - remove all the junk files... - core, /tmp, /var/log/ files you dont want - use 2 tapes instead for the various "stuff" - compress it instead tar zcvbf 64 /dev/ht0 /stuff /moreStuff - note the "z"

Re: backups using tar

2001-08-10 Thread Bob Koss
> "Michael" == Michael Heldebrant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> You may need to install the ide-tape module if it's not Michael> in the kernel you are running already. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log$ grep OnStream dmesg hdc: OnStream DI-30, ATAPI TAPE drive [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var

Re: backups using tar

2001-08-10 Thread Michael Heldebrant
On 10 Aug 2001 16:39:29 -0400, Bob Koss wrote: > > When this box was running RH, I would backup using my Onstream tape > drive thusly: > > tar cvbf 64 /dev/ht0 /stuff /moreStuff > > > With my recent Debian install, this no longer works, giving me a > "device full" error. > > But, with the 2.2

Re: Backups and the distribution

2001-04-21 Thread Jens Gecius
Rob Mahurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:59:08PM -0700, Alex Swavely wrote: > > What file(s) would I need to backup to get a complete snapshot of all > > installed packages from the distribution I'm using in order to be able to > > recover a system to it's previous stat

Re: Backups and the distribution

2001-04-21 Thread Rob Mahurin
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:59:08PM -0700, Alex Swavely wrote: > What file(s) would I need to backup to get a complete snapshot of all > installed packages from the distribution I'm using in order to be able to > recover a system to it's previous state? My nightly backup includes /home /root /etc

Re: Backups and the distribution

2001-04-21 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:42:53PM -0700, Osamu Aoki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Willi Dyck had interesting trick. I knew --get-selections but did not > use it with apt-get. I would do slightly different but this concept is > interesting. > > # dpkg --get-selections | grep -v deinstall | cut -s

Re: Backups and the distribution

2001-04-21 Thread Osamu Aoki
Willi Dyck had interesting trick. I knew --get-selections but did not use it with apt-get. I would do slightly different but this concept is interesting. # dpkg --get-selections | grep -v deinstall | cut -s -f1 >installed.deb # cat installed.db | xargs -n 10 apt-get install -d Oh your Willi's v

Re: Backups and the distribution

2001-04-20 Thread Willi Dyck
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:59:08PM -0700, Alex Swavely wrote: > What file(s) would I need to backup to get a complete snapshot of all > installed packages from the distribution I'm using in order to be able to > recover a system to it's previous state? What about this: (as root of course) ~# dpkg

Re: Backups and the distribution

2001-04-20 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:59:08PM -0700, Alex Swavely ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > What file(s) would I need to backup to get a complete snapshot of all > installed packages from the distribution I'm using in order to be able to > recover a system to it's previous state? To see what packages you

Re: backups

2000-12-21 Thread kmself
on Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:11:32PM -0500, Ken Weingold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I am going to be setting up Linux server at work for something and > want to do backups, weekly I guess. Any suggestions on software to do > this? I am not familiar with unix backups. http://kmself.home.netc

Re: backups

2000-12-21 Thread Joachim Trinkwitz
Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am going to be setting up Linux server at work for something and > want to do backups, weekly I guess. Any suggestions on software to do > this? I am not familiar with unix backups. Maybe not as sophisticated as the other suggested solutions, but I w

Re: backups

2000-12-20 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya ken... if you only want to save "weekly incremental backups" to a second disk find and tar is easy/simple otherwise there is tons of other apps that does it - there are many issues to backups... - backup disk is 100% full - is $50-$xx,000 worth spending or backup sw o

Re: backups

2000-12-20 Thread Dwight Johnson
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Ken Weingold wrote: > I am going to be setting up Linux server at work for something and > want to do backups, weekly I guess. Any suggestions on software to do > this? I am not familiar with unix backups. I can recommend the Ecrix SCSI DLT tape drive -- 66 Gb (or smaller)

Re: backups

2000-12-20 Thread Mark A. Bialik
BRU. It works. Well. http://www.estinc.com Mark > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:11:32PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote: > I am going to be setting up Linux server at work for something and > want to do backups, weekly I guess. Any suggestions on software to do > this? I am not familiar with unix b

Re: backups

2000-12-20 Thread brian moore
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:06:01PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:11:32PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote: > > I am going to be setting up Linux server at work for something and > > want to do backups, weekly I guess. Any suggestions on software to do > > this? I am not familia

Re: backups

2000-12-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:11:32PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote: > I am going to be setting up Linux server at work for something and > want to do backups, weekly I guess. Any suggestions on software to do > this? I am not familiar with unix backups. "There is more than one way to do it" Out there a

Re: Backups & Sharing

1999-05-13 Thread Carl Mummert
One solution: As root: # cd / # find . -xdev | afio -o -Z filename.afio xdev tells find not to go across a mount boundry, so you may have to list several root s for find, i.e. # find . /root /other/dir /somewhere/else -xdev | afio -o -Z filename.afio Of course, there a many ways to do this, s

Re: Backups

1999-03-06 Thread Brandon Mitchell
I'd also add the result of dpkg --get-selections to a backup (redir the output to a file). Brandon +--- ---+ | Brandon Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bmitch.dhis.org/ ICQ 30631197 | | Throughout history, UNIX systems have

Re: Backups

1999-03-06 Thread Christian van Enckevort
Hi Andrew, When I make backups, I do not backup /dev (I do not use any devices that have not been created automatically). I also backup /usr/local (including all subdirs), because I keep some manually installed programmes there and /boot, where I have a customized kernel (the modules are under /li

Re: Backups seem to take too long(scsi tape)

1998-11-05 Thread Torsten Hilbrich
On: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 12:29:57 -0500 (EST) servis writes: > > Hi all, > I have a Seagate Tapestore 8G on a scsi-2 controller. When I back > up my drives(ext2, vfat) and some smbfs mounted drives(over a 10-T) > it seems to take too long. I am just using tar whith compression. > Here are the stats

Re: Backups

1998-09-21 Thread Joey Hess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I love tar it works great... > > > I think that last phrase should be qualified. > I've had two instances where a physical error on the disk was not caught > by tar. On both of those scenarios tar kept witting even though it was > not possible to restore past that poi

Re: Backups

1998-09-21 Thread Stephen J. Carpenter
On Mon, Sep 21, 1998 at 03:26:10PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Stephen J. Carpenter said > > On Tue, Aug 04, 1998 at 11:22:29AM +0100, C.J.LAWSON wrote: > > > Hi, > > >This is a bit off topic (and sorry I cannae answer any of your > > > questions) ... Is tar ever used for backing up and i

Re: Backups

1998-09-21 Thread stick
Stephen J. Carpenter said > On Tue, Aug 04, 1998 at 11:22:29AM +0100, C.J.LAWSON wrote: > > Hi, > >This is a bit off topic (and sorry I cannae answer any of your > > questions) ... Is tar ever used for backing up and if not why not .. if it > > is why is it not the defacto standard > > > > --

Re: Backups

1998-09-21 Thread Stephen J. Carpenter
On Tue, Aug 04, 1998 at 11:22:29AM +0100, C.J.LAWSON wrote: > Hi, >This is a bit off topic (and sorry I cannae answer any of your > questions) ... Is tar ever used for backing up and if not why not .. if it > is why is it not the defacto standard > > --Jonathan Well...I use tar... In fact I

Re: Backups

1998-08-04 Thread C.J.LAWSON
Hi, This is a bit off topic (and sorry I cannae answer any of your questions) ... Is tar ever used for backing up and if not why not .. if it is why is it not the defacto standard --Jonathan On Sat, 1 Aug 1998, Johann Spies wrote: > Hallo, > > I have come to the conclusion that I cannot ge

Re: Backups

1998-08-01 Thread Johann Spies
Thanks Hamish. On Sat, 1 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Most use ftape; I assume they all do. BRU2000 for example. > I recommend subscribing to the linux-tape list to discuss this; > write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text "subscribe linux-tape". > Claus, ftape's maintainer, is very helpful a

Re: Backups

1998-08-01 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Aug 01, 1998 at 05:02:59AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote: > I have come to the conclusion that I cannot get reliable backups using > ftape and my Iomega Ditto 2Gb tape drive. While trying out the latest > beta version of ftape, two of my tapes (one - 3.7 gig - was bought the day > before) wer

Re: Backups on Iomega-ditto 2Gb tape drive

1998-05-20 Thread joost
On Wed, 20 May 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 1998 at 01:08:18PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > How did you get this to work at all? Last time I looked around on the web > > (1.5 weeks ago) all I could find was a page that said that Ditto units > > were not supported and that

Re: Backups on Iomega-ditto 2Gb tape drive

1998-05-20 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, May 20, 1998 at 01:08:18PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How did you get this to work at all? Last time I looked around on the web > (1.5 weeks ago) all I could find was a page that said that Ditto units > were not supported and that driver development was in foetal stage. > > I'm real

Re: Backups on Iomega-ditto 2Gb tape drive

1998-05-20 Thread joost
On Wed, 20 May 1998, Johann Spies wrote: > Hallo, > > I would like to hear whether there is somebody using the Iomega-ditto 2Gb > tape drive for reliable backups. > > I have tried out tbackup, but the documentation says it is not supposed to > handle a lot of files - 30 000 if I remember corre