Re: BIND problem

2016-02-23 Thread Glenn English
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Reco wrote: > > Why, it's worth a shot. But doing it by hand would be > counter-productive. They have invented 'debsums' for cases like this, > after all. OK. Sounds reasonable. I'll try it in the morning. -- Glenn English

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-23 Thread Reco
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:04:52 -0700 Glenn English wrote: > > > On Feb 23, 2016, at 8:56 AM, Reco wrote: > > > > First things first, unless someone deliberately customized > > it, /etc/rc.local should contain exactly one meaningful line - 'exit > > 0'. > > It does. See below. > > > Your result

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-23 Thread Glenn English
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 8:56 AM, Reco wrote: > > First things first, unless someone deliberately customized > it, /etc/rc.local should contain exactly one meaningful line - 'exit > 0'. It does. See below. > Your result shows entirely different thing though. Well, I just asked egrep to look for

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-23 Thread Reco
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:42:59 -0700 Glenn English wrote: > > > On Feb 23, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Reco wrote: > > > I'd start with rkhunter check first. Just to be sure. > > Checking for enabled inetd services [ Warning ] > > That's AmandaClient, the backup software. Harml

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-23 Thread Glenn English
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Reco wrote: > I'd start with rkhunter check first. Just to be sure. Checking for enabled inetd services [ Warning ] That's AmandaClient, the backup software. Checking if SSH root access is allowed [ Warning ] It is

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-23 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:44:23 -0700 Glenn English wrote: > > > On Feb 22, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Reco wrote: > > > > First one is 'ls -ald /var/cache'. > > root@log:~# ls -ald /var/cache > drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 Oct 12 2013 /var/cache > > > Second one is 'sudo -u touch /var/cac

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-22 Thread Glenn English
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Reco wrote: > > First one is 'ls -ald /var/cache'. root@log:~# ls -ald /var/cache drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 Oct 12 2013 /var/cache > Second one is 'sudo -u touch /var/cache/bind/slaves/1'. sudo: unknown user: touch sudo: unable to initialize policy plugin (

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-22 Thread Reco
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:33:54 -0700 Glenn English wrote: > > > On Feb 22, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Reco wrote: > > > > So, what permissions does /var/cache and /var/cache/bind have? > > root@log:~# ls -lh /var/cache/bind > total 48K > -rw-rw-r-- 1 bind bind 221 Oct 12 2013 managed-keys.bind > -rw-r

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-22 Thread Glenn English
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Reco wrote: > > So, what permissions does /var/cache and /var/cache/bind have? root@log:~# ls -lh /var/cache/bind total 48K -rw-rw-r-- 1 bind bind 221 Oct 12 2013 managed-keys.bind -rw-rw-r-- 1 bind bind 512 Oct 12 2013 managed-keys.bind.jnl drwxrwxr-x 2 bind

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-22 Thread Reco
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:33:03 -0700 Glenn English wrote: > > > On Feb 22, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Reco wrote: > > > > No, that's not how you check it. Every Debian system has those records. > > I meant something like 'ls -alZ /'. > > drwxr-xr-x 25 root root? 4096 Jun 6 2014 . > drwxr-xr-x

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-22 Thread Glenn English
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Reco wrote: > > No, that's not how you check it. Every Debian system has those records. > I meant something like 'ls -alZ /'. drwxr-xr-x 25 root root? 4096 Jun 6 2014 . drwxr-xr-x 25 root root? 4096 Jun 6 2014 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 root root?

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-22 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:07:44 -0700 Glenn English wrote: > > > On Feb 22, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Reco wrote: > > > > Please post the output of: > > > > ls -ald /var/cache/bind/slaves > > drwxrwxr-x 2 bind bind 4096 Feb 5 07:52 /var/cache/bind/slaves > > > lsattr /var/cache/bind/slav

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-22 Thread Glenn English
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Reco wrote: > > Please post the output of: > > ls -ald /var/cache/bind/slaves drwxrwxr-x 2 bind bind 4096 Feb 5 07:52 /var/cache/bind/slaves > lsattr /var/cache/bind/slaves -e-- /var/cache/bind/slaves/db.172.16.0 -e-- /var/cache/bind/sl

Re: BIND problem

2016-02-22 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 02:35:52 -0700 Glenn English wrote: > I'm seeing lots of: > > > Feb 21 23:32:24 log named[20061]: dumping master file: > > /var/cache/bind/slaves/tmp-I5cJjYH7fV: open: permission denied > > Feb 21 23:36:54 log named[20117]: dumping master file: > > /var/cache/b

Re: bind problem

2001-05-10 Thread Stefan Srdic
Angel Parra wrote: > Hello! > > I have a mini-router (linux) with ipmasq, and an internal server. My > small server has the bind server, and on normal botting the bind server > only servers the names filed on my own database ... but if I stop the > bind server and start it again, it works

Re: Bind Problem : Another kind of idea !

1999-09-18 Thread Seth R Arnold
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 09:44:54PM +0200, Sami Dalouche wrote: > Hi all, > I've seen that bind will become a problem in its future releases, > so, I'm now thinking that the non-US division is really stupid ! > Why not syncing non-US and main ?? Only because this > policy forbit it ? > So, let's