Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 29/12/2017 à 18:27, Andrew W a écrit :
>>
>> On 27/12/2017 13:18, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>>> Current BIND9 defaults to doing DNSSEC verification. DNSSEC needs large
>>> packets. You might have an issue with UDP fragments being dropped at
>>> your firewall/NAT Gateway?
Le 29/12/2017 à 18:27, Andrew W a écrit :
On 27/12/2017 13:18, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Current BIND9 defaults to doing DNSSEC verification. DNSSEC needs large
packets. You might have an issue with UDP fragments being dropped at
your firewall/NAT Gateway?
Thanks for this tip. Looking into it I
On 27/12/2017 13:18, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Current BIND9 defaults to doing DNSSEC verification. DNSSEC needs large
packets. You might have an issue with UDP fragments being dropped at
your firewall/NAT Gateway?
Thanks for this tip. Looking into it I discovered TCP seems to be
recommened fo
Andrew Wood wrote:
Hi,
> I have a server which acts as a DNS server for our LAN. All our internal
> servers have A records on it using a .local domain and it forwards all
> other requests out to the root servers using the in built list provided
> with BIND. All clients on the LAN have this ma
Andrew W wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone have any ideas please?
>
I had the same experience - I think (after trying this and that) the
solution was ntp (time was behind on the server), but I am not really 100%.
I was thinking first it has something to do with ipv6 or firewall, but after
updating the
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:54:39 -0800
"Brian C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a single machine running BIND and Apache. I've never used
> either before. I've just upgraded this box from stable to testing. I
> have never been able to get the web site to show up using its domain
> name. I can typ
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Brian C wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a single machine running BIND and Apache. I've never used either
> before. I've just upgraded this box from stable to testing. I have never
> been able to get the web site to show up using its domain name. I can type
> my static IP address
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:22:54PM -0500, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote:
> Does anyone have a down and dirty, current and quick HOWTO on setting up
> BIND for a few domain names?
Check out the DNS-HOWTO. It goes into a lot if theory up front, and
you really should read that part, but you'd probably
Feb 13, 2002 @09:22:54PM -0500, Matthew Daubenspeck posts :
> Does anyone have a down and dirty, current and quick HOWTO on setting
> up BIND for a few domain names ?
Not dirty anyway, bind9 specific
http://cvs.linuxfromscratch.org/index.cgi/~checkout~/hints/bind.txt?rev=1.3&content-type=te
9 matches
Mail list logo
