On Saturday 23 July 2016 14:02:55 Hans wrote:
> Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2016, 08:38:02 schrieb S. P. Molnar:
> > I am running v-8.4 and get the following error:
> >
> > E: The package virtualbox-5.1 needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find
> > an archive for it.
> >
> > This resulted from my bumbling
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2016, 08:38:02 schrieb S. P. Molnar:
> I am running v-8.4 and get the following error:
>
> E: The package virtualbox-5.1 needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find
> an archive for it.
>
> This resulted from my bumbling effort to remove virtualbox.
>
> What is the solution to
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Daniel Burrows
> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:46:13AM -0400, Tom H was
> heard to say:
> >> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Mike Viau
> wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H
> was
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:46:13AM -0400, Tom H was
> heard to say:
>> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Mike Viau wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H was
>> >> heard to say:
>> >> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:23:12PM +0200, James Stuckey
was heard to say:
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > That's the problem -- you have no (active) "deb" lines for unstable,
> > so apt doesn't know which packages are from it.
>
> The aptitude search ~Aunstable ap
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:09:32PM +0200, James Stuckey <
> jhstuc...@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Daniel Burrows
> wrote:
> > > Did you mean to drop debian-user?
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 06:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:09:32PM +0200, James Stuckey
was heard to say:
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Did you mean to drop debian-user?
> >
> > On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 06:29:55PM +0200, James Stuckey <
> > jhstuc...@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> > > I have the n
All of these searches return nothing:
stuc...@debian:~/tmp$ apt-show-versions | grep unstable
stuc...@debian:~/tmp$ aptitude search ~Aunstable
stuc...@debian:~/tmp$ aptitude search ~Aunstable~i
stuc...@debian:~/tmp$ aptitude search '?narrow(?archive(unstable),
?installed)'
I know something must b
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:46:13AM -0400, Tom H was heard
to say:
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Mike Viau wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H was
> >> heard to say:
> >> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > You could find
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:37:24AM -0400, Mike Viau was
heard to say:
> > Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:10:56 -0700 wrote:
> > $ aptitude search '?narrow('?archive(unstable), ?installed)'
>
> debian01:~# aptitude search '?narrow('?archive(unstable), ?installed)'
>
> -bash: syntax error near unexpected
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Mike Viau wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H was
>> heard to say:
>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system
>> > > by
>> > > apt-show
> Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:10:56 -0700 wrote:
> On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:04:07AM -0400, Mike Viau
> was heard to say:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H was
> > > heard to say:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > You
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:04:07AM -0400, Mike Viau was
heard to say:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H was
> > heard to say:
> > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 08:58:19PM -0700, Daniel Burrows
was heard to say:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:54:57PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
> was heard to say:
> > My instinct is that '-t $something' effectively increases the priority of
> > all
> > packages from the $something repository
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H was
> heard to say:
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram wrote:
> > >
> > > You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system by
> > > apt-show-versions | grep unstable
> >
> > Or "aptitude search ~Aunstable"
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:54:57PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> My instinct is that '-t $something' effectively increases the priority of all
> packages from the $something repository, which may make the dependency
> resolver pull more from that repository than is absolut
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H was heard
to say:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram wrote:
> >
> > You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system by
> > apt-show-versions | grep unstable
>
> Or "aptitude search ~Aunstable"
or "aptitude
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 00:08, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> wrote:
>> On Friday 30 April 2010 12:10:45 James Stuckey wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
>>>
>>> b...@iguanasuicide.net> wrote:
>>> > On Friday 30 April 2010
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
> On Friday 30 April 2010 12:10:45 James Stuckey wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
>>
>> b...@iguanasuicide.net> wrote:
>> > On Friday 30 April 2010 06:16:22 James Stuckey wrote:
>> > > The unstable/si
On Friday 30 April 2010 12:10:45 James Stuckey wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
>
> b...@iguanasuicide.net> wrote:
> > On Friday 30 April 2010 06:16:22 James Stuckey wrote:
> > > The unstable/sid doesn't have to be comment out. Setting the default
> > > release w
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram wrote:
>
> You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system by
> apt-show-versions | grep unstable
Or "aptitude search ~Aunstable"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 21:14, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
> On Friday 30 April 2010 06:16:22 James Stuckey wrote:
>> The unstable/sid doesn't have to be comment out. Setting the default
>> release will keep the system tracked to, in this case, testing.
>
> Er, mostly.
>
> If there is a version
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
b...@iguanasuicide.net> wrote:
> On Friday 30 April 2010 06:16:22 James Stuckey wrote:
> > The unstable/sid doesn't have to be comment out. Setting the default
> > release will keep the system tracked to, in this case, testing.
>
> Er, mos
On Friday 30 April 2010 06:16:22 James Stuckey wrote:
> The unstable/sid doesn't have to be comment out. Setting the default
> release will keep the system tracked to, in this case, testing.
Er, mostly.
If there is a versioned dependency that can be satisfied from sid but not
testing, you will
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Anand Sivaram wrote:
> That looks like a problem. You have unstable version of gcc-4.4-base
> (4.4.3-9) installed, but now your unstable/sid is commented out. So
> when you try to install g++ which has dependency on gcc-4.4-base, it
> is trying to revert the gcc
That looks like a problem. You have unstable version of gcc-4.4-base
(4.4.3-9) installed, but now your unstable/sid is commented out. So
when you try to install g++ which has dependency on gcc-4.4-base, it
is trying to revert the gcc-4.4-base to that of squeeze (4.4.2-9).
Install the package "apt
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Kousik Maiti wrote:
> Try
>
> apt-get install fakeroot devscripts build-essential
>
> If it gives error then post your /etc/apt/sources.list
>
>
>
>> I selected "n" and it prompted me to "downgrade the packages to testing".
>> This means that the versions it had
Try
apt-get install fakeroot devscripts build-essential
If it gives error then post your /etc/apt/sources.list
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:07 PM, James Stuckey wrote:
>
> Have you tried "apt-get update" or "aptitude update" before trying to
>> install these packages?
>>
>>
> Yes, I did "aptit
> Have you tried "apt-get update" or "aptitude update" before trying to
> install these packages?
>
>
Yes, I did "aptitude safe-upgrade" after "aptitude update" and then
"aptitude full-upgrade".
I selected "n" and it prompted me to "downgrade the packages to testing".
This means that the versions
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 15:58, James Stuckey wrote:
> Why am I getting this and how can I fix it?
>
> r...@debian:/home/stuckey# aptitude install fakeroot devscripts
> build-essential
> Reading package lists... Done
>
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Reading extende
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 09:13, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> For quite some time now I've been seeing the following lines when I
> upgrade packages:
>
> database /var/lib/apt/listchanges.db failed to load.
> Exception bsddb.db.DBRunRecoveryError: DBRunRecoveryError(-30975,
> 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error,
[Please don't hijack threads]
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:17:14PM +0800, Fan Liu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I encountered such an error when I try to upgrade my debian lenny.
> Writing extended state information... Error!
> E: The package index files are corrupted. No Filename: field for package
> lib
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:17:14PM +0800, Fan Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard
to say:
> Hi all,
>
> I encountered such an error when I try to upgrade my debian lenny.
>
> Writing extended state information... Error!
> E: The package index files are corrupted. No Filename: field for package
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
