On 2007-12-29 19:35 +0100, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Why not have aptitude: 1) retreive the deb(s) required; 2) deinstall the
> package and verify that it is nolonger installed; 3) immediatly
> reinstall the package and verify that that it is now installed.
Sounds rather dangerous to me. You w
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 08:30:15AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 04:04:02PM -0500, "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> Just to clarify, the problem isn't just that aptitude doesn't have a
> state for "reinstall". It actually did at one point (
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 04:04:02PM -0500, "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 04:35:36PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> > I'm not sure what does it mean with "will not be saved when you...". Is
> > it that there will be no way to know that the packa
El vie, 28-12-2007 a las 16:04 -0500, Douglas A. Tutty escribió:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 04:35:36PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> >
> > Aptitude users's manual explains the reinstall men?? command as follows:
> >
> > > Reinstalls the package.
> > >
> > > Note that the reinstallation will no
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 04:35:36PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
>
> Aptitude users's manual explains the reinstall men?? command as follows:
>
> > Reinstalls the package.
> >
> > Note that the reinstallation will not be saved when you quit aptitude or
> > perform an install run for technical
5 matches
Mail list logo
