Re: Apt-get UPgrade today

2000-11-17 Thread dude
i removed xmh, because i say it was conflicintg, duting the install' also remved xlibs which took out a whole bunch of packages Do you know where at-getkeeps a log of all its errors or messages? brw, thanks for your help. On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, John Galt wrote: > > xlibs conflicts with the ve

Re: Apt-get UPgrade today

2000-11-17 Thread John Galt
xlibs conflicts with the version you have ATM (at least it did for me last week when I apparently dealt with the problem). dist-upgrade should've solved it (that WAS the whole point of dist-upgrade at one time). If you know the culprit, just plain install it. My usual process for unstable upgra

Re: Apt-get UPgrade today

2000-11-17 Thread dude
still Didnt help install xlibs which seems to be the root of the problem g On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, John Galt wrote: > > do a dist-upgrade and that should bring down the number of "not > installed"... > > On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, dude wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all. > > > > I've Just > > Upgraded to

Re: Apt-get UPgrade today

2000-11-17 Thread dude
thanks ill give it a try g On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, John Galt wrote: > > do a dist-upgrade and that should bring down the number of "not > installed"... > > On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, dude wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all. > > > > I've Just > > Upgraded today and have noted that exactly 41 packages have not

Re: Apt-get UPgrade today

2000-11-17 Thread John Galt
do a dist-upgrade and that should bring down the number of "not installed"... On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, dude wrote: > > > Hello all. > > I've Just > Upgraded today and have noted that exactly 41 packages have not been fully > installed or removed > > The only error is get is: > > /var/cache/apt/