Bryan Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may be relatred to the problem I ran into. Unfortunately for me
> the perl 5.6.0 directory was already nuked by the upgrade process and
> the upgrade failed due to missing files. I restored from backups as
remove/purge libapache-mod-perl pac
Tommy Wu wrote:
>
> scheme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm using woody on PIII. I found since June 26 or so when I dist-upgrade
> > the system, my apache server reported "Apache.pm failed to load" and
> > refused to work.
> > Does anybody know how to solve the problem?
>
> I found that mo
scheme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using woody on PIII. I found since June 26 or so when I dist-upgrade
> the system, my apache server reported "Apache.pm failed to load" and
> refused to work.
> Does anybody know how to solve the problem?
I found that mod_perl use perl 5.6.0. but in woo
scheme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That seems to be partially related to perl package. As I downgraded to
> the packages apache-common and apache-perl found in potato 2.2r3, it
> refused to work as well, though the message was not that Apache.pm
> cannot be loaded but "httpd could not be start
4 matches
Mail list logo