Bob Proulx:
> Jochen Schulz wrote:
>
>> Modern browsers appear to support that TLS extension:
>> https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Browser\
> s
>
> I will implement this in a test installation and get some experience
> with this feature. The future looks bright
Jochen Schulz wrote:
> The problem is/was that the TLS handshake was initiated before the
> HTTP request was sent. Since only the request included the
> Host-Header, the web server couldn't show a certificate for the
> requested domain name. A better explanation can be found here:
>
> http://httpd
In <201101241443.22084@iguanasuicide.net>, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/NameBasedSSLVHostsWithSNI
>
>I believe Lenny does actually have a recent enough version of both apache2
>and libssl0.9.8, but I've not tried using SNI with Lenny's version of
>Apache.
(Correc
Bob Proulx:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
>> ... Apache (from upstream) has supported it for a while and I've had
>> it in production (system based on Ubuntu Maverick) for a number of
>> months.
>
> Re: NameVirtualHost *:443
>
> This is good to hear but if so then how do they pull that off?
In <20110124202335.ga5...@hysteria.proulx.com>, Bob Proulx wrote:
>In another thread:
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> ... Apache (from upstream) has supported it for a while and I've had
>> it in production (system based on Ubuntu Maverick) for a number of
>> months.
>
>Re: NameVirtualHost *:443
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 01:23:35PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> In another thread:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Is there a way to have all of the browsers use starttls
> for https
...
> and to be able to share virtual hosts with SSL on a single
> IP address? That would be awesome! Where can I
6 matches
Mail list logo
