Curt wrote:
> On 2020-01-08, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >>
> >> I consider natively to denote a device (in this case) that works without
> >> the requirement of any software emulation to lead it to believe it is
> >> functioning on a OS different from the host OS.
> >
> > That's a pretty odd interpreta
On 2020-01-08, Dan Ritter wrote:
>>
>> I consider natively to denote a device (in this case) that works without
>> the requirement of any software emulation to lead it to believe it is
>> functioning on a OS different from the host OS.
>
> That's a pretty odd interpretation: very few physical dev
Curt wrote:
> On 2020-01-06, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > I think of "natively" as meaning "supported in the standard
> > kernel". Some devices will still require a firmware blob, and
> > of those, some will require an unfree firmware blob.
>
> I consider natively to denote a device (in this case)
On 2020-01-06, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> I think of "natively" as meaning "supported in the standard
> kernel". Some devices will still require a firmware blob, and
> of those, some will require an unfree firmware blob.
I consider natively to denote a device (in this case) that works without
the req
On 1/7/20 1:19 PM, deloptes wrote:
Bob McGowan wrote:
It looks like the majority of the pure Bluetooth devices are only 4.0.
There is one combination WIFI/Bluetooth I saw that is 5.0.
The version here does not mean anything relevant to the support by the OS.
BT4.0 in terms of hardware is comp
Bob McGowan wrote:
> It looks like the majority of the pure Bluetooth devices are only 4.0.
> There is one combination WIFI/Bluetooth I saw that is 5.0.
The version here does not mean anything relevant to the support by the OS.
BT4.0 in terms of hardware is compatible with bluez5 in terms of soft
On 1/5/20 3:24 AM, deloptes wrote:
André Rodier wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a USB / Bluetooth 5 adapter, natively compatible with
Debian.
Thanks,
André
most of them are
I use ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode)
Double check if adapter (newer once) are
Curt wrote:
> On 2020-01-05, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> >
> > Most bluetooth adapters work when adding nonfree blobs to the mix.
> >
>
> Not to belabor a trivial point, but I wondered whether "natively" (about
> whose definition I didn't really reflect when first reading the OP) is
> actually
André Rodier wrote:
> For a while, I thought your instructions would work, but no:
>
> --
> root@lovelace:~# hciconfig
> hci1: Type: Primary Bus: USB
> BD Address: 00:1A:7D:DA:71:11 ACL MTU: 679:9 SCO MTU: 48:16
> DOWN
> RX
André Rodier wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. I have this one, but I could not manage to have
> it working. The usual hciconfig command fails, with an error message
> "not supported". The interface is marked as down.
>
> The device appears on Windows, but neither works.
>
> I don't mind (too muc
Quoting André Rodier (2020-01-05 13:38:03)
> On Sun, 2020-01-05 at 12:24 +0100, deloptes wrote:
> > André Rodier wrote:
> > > I am looking for a USB / Bluetooth 5 adapter, natively compatible
> > > with Debian.
> > most of them are
> >
> > I use ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetoot
On 2020-01-05, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Most bluetooth adapters work when adding nonfree blobs to the mix.
>
Not to belabor a trivial point, but I wondered whether "natively" (about
whose definition I didn't really reflect when first reading the OP) is
actually synonymous with free as opposed
Quoting deloptes (2020-01-05 12:24:55)
> André Rodier wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am looking for a USB / Bluetooth 5 adapter, natively compatible with
> > Debian.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > André
>
> most of them are
>
> I use ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode)
>
André Rodier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for a USB / Bluetooth 5 adapter, natively compatible with
> Debian.
>
> Thanks,
> André
most of them are
I use ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode)
Double check if adapter (newer once) are LE - there were issues wi
14 matches
Mail list logo
