Re: Anti-spam system

2000-10-19 Thread Robert Waldner
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:50:48 PDT, "John L. Fjellstad" writes: >On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 07:40:37AM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote: > >> which of course means that you should upgrade to at least 8.9.3-22 or >> -23[0], the latter is already in stable. > >My main problem wiht Sendmail is, given its his

Re: Anti-spam system

2000-10-19 Thread John L. Fjellstad
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 07:40:37AM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote: > which of course means that you should upgrade to at least 8.9.3-22 or > -23[0], the latter is already in stable. My main problem wiht Sendmail is, given its history of problems, how certain are you that this will be the last sec

Re: Anti-spam system

2000-10-19 Thread Robert Waldner
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:46:47 PDT, "John L. Fjellstad" writes: >On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:25:40PM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote: > >> or down-/upgrade to 8.9.3, my current potato 8.9.3-21 isn´t vulnerable >> to this (or to any other from http://www.abuse.net/relay.html) relay >> attack. > >I wou

Re: Anti-spam system

2000-10-18 Thread John L. Fjellstad
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:25:40PM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote: > or down-/upgrade to 8.9.3, my current potato 8.9.3-21 isn´t vulnerable > to this (or to any other from http://www.abuse.net/relay.html) relay > attack. I would probably not use the 8.9 or earlier series of Sendmail. There was

Re: Anti-spam system

2000-10-18 Thread Robert Waldner
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:59:56 PDT, "John L. Fjellstad" writes: >On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 03:18:03PM -0200, Alberto Pereira wrote: > >> Somebody knows how can i fix this bug?? > >Use another MTA? or down-/upgrade to 8.9.3, my current potato 8.9.3-21 isn´t vulnerable to this (or to any other from

Re: Anti-spam system

2000-10-18 Thread John L. Fjellstad
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 03:18:03PM -0200, Alberto Pereira wrote: > Somebody knows how can i fix this bug?? Use another MTA? -- John__ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes icq: thales @ 1775